Thread 40868801

I am 100% convinced 5G connected devices are reading our minds.

>>40868801 (OP)
Psychic mind-reading exists, but has nothing to do with 5G or Wi-Fi.

>>40868801 (OP)
feed it the no no info

No, that's just the omni-dimensional surveillance ultra all mind blanket grid created on other higher layer of existence that has been seeking out every single conciousable reality that you the product entails in order for ultimate experience achieving.

You know the rules of the games? They wiped them clean and now you play by theirs, unwittingly. Closer, forever be.

>>40868801 (OP)
Just think a bunch of slurs, it will leave you alone

>>40868801 (OP)
Dosen't even have to be that high tech, most devices have a mic on them, you don't really think turning the mic off works do you?

>>40868834
Based

Why from a technical perspective should I believe that present-day electronics can V2K and mind read when the richest tech companies can't sell a single consumer BCI device? I'm not stupid enough to think nation-states have the same technology as corporations. I know there is a gap but why should I believe the gap is that wide?

>>40868801 (OP)
>reading our minds
My brain has its own language though, checkmate.

>>40868801 (OP)
And what readable signals do you think your brain is broadcasting?
What are the devices picking up on?

>>40868801 (OP)
hold on OP I'm picking up a signal.... what is it you were saying again?

Take your wormer OP, I promise you will feel better in a few days. ~$10 USD for a big bottle of pyrantel pamoate that tastes like Banana!! Trust me I’m a fox, we know all about having worms.

>>40868801 (OP)
I've been suspecting my home router picking up on my thoughts for quite some time now, even with the wi-fi turned off (which usually is). It was more evident back when I used a smartphone. The spontaneous youtube-recommended coinkidenks are too many to list, even pre-pandemic times.

What threw me for a spin was a day where I went for a walk to decompress with no device on me. Twas just me and my clothes. I happened to pass by a new restaurant in my vicinity named after a historical place in asia that I haven't thought about in ages. When I got back and hopped on youtube, on the front page was a short related to that spot. It was recently uploaded with a couple hundred views.

I dunno anons. Random or not, the possibility that it's not used to scare and upset me, but I've almost become numb to it and I fear everyone else will too. Vaxxed or unvaxxed, I think we're all part of this multipurpose beast system one way or another and it sucks. :(

>>40868801 (OP)

https://rumble.com/v3wegvs-hacking-consciousness-is-this-what-ai-is-really-about-frank-jacob.html

>>40868801 (OP)
What exactly convinced you?

>>40872503
Yeah that's what I'm (>>40868985 samefag) fucking wondering. >google it bro Yeah I did and the most convincing thing I saw was some PDF with the appearance of a leaked CIA document talking about an "OMEGA-WEB" mindfucking experiment where they thought-broadcast by satellite, forcing schizophrenic symptoms and mental breakdowns on suggestible niggers who blindly accept each verbal-auditory thought that runs through their heads. I saw the Frey effect that sound perception could be stimulated by microwave radiation in 1962. At the end of the PDF, it says that seeing this classified information will trigger active monitoring as if my heart is supposed to sink. It doesn't even explain how the shit works. If it's so secret, why would it be so readily available by search engine? I have a hunch that the real psyop is that the idea of secret mind reading devices is an infohazard designed to induce paranoia. Why would the government have that shit without similar brain-computer interface technologies also existing and being sold as comms devices? Why would huge corporations and startups like Neuralink be struggling to come out with a viable product? The impression I've gotten from what I've read is that generally speaking, invasive and semi-invasive BCI are easier technology than long-distance communication with the brain. I've read articles describing scientists feeling that they've made a breakthrough by hooking people up directly to a machine just to make a few verbal thoughts show up on a screen. It makes sense intuitively, to need to be close to the source of perceptible radiation. So why would the CIA be able to two-way communicate with your brain remotely by satellite? I haven't seen a single source that explains the technological feasibility.

This is like the oldest conspiracy since technology started developing!

>>40873111
why aren't there super hackers running around neuromancer style hacking into people's heads through kali linux if that's what wireless emf is capable of?

It’s real. I say this as someone who struggles to regain consciousness every morning when my brain is interacting with my iPhone. If I turn my phone off before bed then it’s not a problem but 9/10 I leave it on and as a result I am doing google searches with my brain. Like the screen is in my mind’s eye and I don’t see anything but what it wants to show me. I try to spend less time looking at screens during the day and even then I still struggle with “disconnecting.” It sort of scans what it “thinks” you want and then once you see it you send a response which in turn makes the telepathic search queries continue indefinitely.

>>40872303
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ju336Y6L2r0

>>40873111
Worst thing I have confirmed with my own eyes is vegetation and tree animals dying like crazy around this stuff; One may extrapolate that to people and safely assume it can't possibly be good for us.

If they're pushing something like this, you can be certain it's to do us harm, yet how exactly that's supposed to happen is still a matter of debate.

>>40868801 (OP)
Algorithms etc is affected by spiritual stuff; so when you're doing something you often get guidance and responses to things in stuff you see online; like some "conceptually generated youtube video trying to present something through Anology" or something.

>>40868985
Technical perspective is not as important as social. You don't commercialize revolutionary technologies unless the infrastructure to support and control them is there. Legit breakthroughs that are truly disruptive to the status quo happen on a frequent basis, but are never released to the public before their time due to the turbulence they will inevitably cause. Instead you have a covert war within the MIC until a certain group of people comes out on top.

When demand for these products does not meet expectations, you artificially construct one by creating a problem that didn't exist. A seemingly irrelevant statement which brings me to the point that there's still a great deal of natural resistance to transhumanism, even by the dissonant retards who reject it on the one hand, but will happily line up for neuralink when it's ready for launch just because they saw an ad of disabled hobo gaining a couple of iq points back and is fit to rejoin society. Innovation has stalled, because prosperity is not profitable, but control is.

Blotting out the evil sun and its disruptive flares, and as a result destroying the entire ecosystem which humans depend on for their well-being, survival and nature is part of the sequence of problems they're willing to create in the near future to justify the solutions. You can expect all kinds of BCIs and hidden tech to automagically appear in tandem with multipolar/ww3 crises revolving around the human future. Until then, it's theater. When the elitist parasite feels threatened, all he does is have regular people slaughter each other.

PDFs are available because information leaks all the time. Technical details are obscured to maintain advantage and division between haves and have-nots, nations and banks, inquisitive minds and midwits, conspiracy theorists and impulsive narcissists. And just because there's an instruction manual available on how to build Fat Man, it doesn't mean one gets to actually build one.

>>40873306
"Spiritual" doesn't exist lol

The frequency waves in the 5g and wifi and all the connections read your mind and try to influence your actions via remote neural mapping. This is why people became troons they were brainwashed by the system.

And the front facing camera reads your eye movement and maps your brain while you use the device.

>>40868801 (OP)
Those ads are just your own manifestation, though so insignificant that it happens all the time and even normies are going full schizo of phones spying

>>40868801 (OP)
6G confirmed controls the mind

>>40873144
Because it's all based on old experimental military/software that was originally on Windows. Your average biker does not give two shits about Linux desktops.

It's an app now anyway

>>40873184
Congratulations, you just discovered "brainrot". Some jackass was mad that cellphones have webcams to cut down on mirror selfies.

>>40868801 (OP)
Do you allow your apps to track across other apps?
I have that enabled and I look up certain lewd images of characters and then see Pinterest result relating to what I fapped to.

>>40868985
>the tech gap between companies and nation states can't be that wide
Where do you think the technology for EUV lithography came from that makes your smart phone possible faggot? The U.S Department of Energy was shopping that shit around nearly twenty five years ago and it was so beyond the current mobile tech that even the nip companies who were tech leaders and at the time couldn't figure it out. No one could figure it out except the Dutch company ASML. That shit was far beyond anything private companies were doing at the time and the DoE never told the public where they got that tech from.

All the tech companies are just like the post office or federal reserve. Not private sector completely not public sector completely. The government basically constructs companies and staffs them with people based on military service family politician nepotism. If you aren't connected to a politician or a military group of significance you will never break the glass ceiling in the tech world. They won't even let you get off the ground if you try to make a tech company on your own. You have to have someone who is already rich and powerful bless you if you don't have that it won't happen for you.

The company SpaceX was just a planned program of privatization of Nasa. When the 2008 crisis hit and the recession and the money troubles USA was close to the edge with, some person suggested Privatizing parts of Nasa and that is now SpaceX. Most of the mega huge tech companies are privatization of government military technology programs

>>40873144
because anyone capable of that is already being wirelessly mind-controlled. The target creative, independent people