Thread 40903159

Have you notice every religion and/or form of spirituality have no place for us celibates? They were all made for Chad and Stacy.
Both christianity and satanism requires you to fuck women. If you dont fuck, then you are not worthy of God or Satan. Same for paganism and Islam. Some pagans (of the /pol/ kind) are even worse than christians in preaching procreation as a moral obligation.
Maybe only buddhism tolerates incels, because they preach detachment from carnal pleasures, as desire brings suffering. The Buddha also said women can't reach nirvana and need to reincarnate several times in order to become men and then try it. Mind you, the Buddha was no incel, he had access to plenty of women, and women at that time had curves, so the temptation was even higher.
However, modern buddhism is no different than any of the others. They need to appeal to the masses of npcs, hence the requirement to fuck in order to have communion with them.
We need to devise a spirituality specific to us, that excludes hylic women, and their retainers, from everything, from meditation to psychonautics, from ordered communion to metaphysical doctrine. And that, once the seeker lays down with a Stacy, he is no longer part of it, and it is forever bound to the hylic endless cycles.
The first thing I propose is to pervert and corrupt Jung's teachings. The anima (female) and animus (male) spirits can only manifest if the seeker have the Y cromossome, else they dont. Those who receive the anima are straight males, and the animus are gay males. Without the anima manifested everything you do regarding sexual spirits (such as tulpas and succubi) is a larp. Also we need to remind many of these thinkers were married, so their opinion over ancient concepts was biased by the presence of a hylic women.

>>40903159 (OP)
>Both christianity and satanism requires you to fuck women.

Not in the bible.

Celibacy, renunciation, and self control are probably the most concrete and obvious overlap between Christianity, Buddhism, and Hinduism. Where does your message come from?

Bump.

>>40903159 (OP)
>Both christianity
Kindom of god is not of this world
Actual christianity is unfriendly to normalfags

>>40903159 (OP)

Matthew 19:10-12
10. The disciples said to Him, “If the relationship of the man with his wife is like this, it is better not to marry.” 11. But He said to them, “Not all men can accept this statement, but only those to whom it has been given. 12. For there are eunuchs who were born that way from their mother’s womb; and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men; and there are also eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to accept this, let him accept it.”

You must not be familiar with ascetic esotericism...

Any form of sex for pleasure is absolutely discouraged. As is eating for pleasure.

Exoteric religions, especially the politically dominant monotheisms, eschew all self-discipline in order to reach the most people. They have either forgotten the esoteric truth, or deliberately conceal it.

The Masters don't fuck around with lust or carnal pleasure.

>>40903159 (OP)
stopped after
> christianity and satanism requires you to fuck women
you obviously have no clue

straight from the bible:
37 However, if a man stands firm in his resolve and feels no necessity but has made up his mind to keep her a virgin, he will be acting appropriately.
38 So then the man who marries the virgin acts appropriately, but the man who refrains from marriage does even better.

you far from the truth, which is Jesus Christ

The question is: should we worship the same god Chad and Stacy worship? Should we go to the same temples they do? Should we follow the same precepts they (say they) do?
I believe we must build a new doctrine focused on sexual resentment above everything else. Instead of an all-compassionate god of humanity, we could have a goddess of inceldom, who would embrace only celibates, and despise all the others. A new ascetic doctrine, focused on the future, as half of the young males dont have sex for more than a year, which means plenty of potential to grow. These incels will never want the same god Chad and Stacy worship, they need something different, that excludes Chad and Stacy and reduce them to animals unworthy of attention. You can't have this with the current religions, as even buddhism wants to embrace the entirety of humanity.
As a political front we could support forced jabs for the children of Chads and Stacies, so that we could have a increase on autistic population.

>>40903159 (OP)
>Both christianity and satanism requires you to fuck women.
Why are you lying?

Matthew 19:11-12
11 Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”

1 Corinthians 7:1-2
7 Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband.

>>40903797
>>40903709
Amen.

>>40903159 (OP)
>Have you notice every religion and/or form of spirituality have no place for us celibates?
Not really. I've mostly seen the opposite. Normies are largely kept in the dark and used by the spiritual institutions.

>>40903165
>be fruitful and multiply
>being gay is wrong because you can't multiply
>not having kids is as wrong as being gay
Most of what Christians believe is in fact not in the bible.

>>40903159 (OP)
I am literally RIGHT HERE

>>40904097
Being fruitful can also mean creating disciples. Paul probably never had children

>>40904292
I agree, and >>40904076 already brought the relevant passages for the issue.