Thread 40921184

Some say she was a larp but that her books on the occult were good, is this book worth?

>>40921184 (OP)
no

>larp
some say she was a plagiarist

>>40921184 (OP)
Idk but something tells me Lucifer will show up shortly to recommend it

>>40921234
hello fellow human, I recommend this book

Try reading it and make your own opinion.

For me, she's a LARPer that can't really write any books because the book is just unreadable ramblings .

Instead.
Read book of RA, The Law of One.

https://www.lawofone.info/

>>40921184 (OP)
It’s not “secret” or “doctrine” and she had a smelly fanny. 1/10.

>>40921219
Plagiarist, larper and grifter

>>40921517
prove your claims with a peer review please?

>>40921184 (OP)
Ya but read the abridged versions. Blavatsky was right on the big picture but got lost in the noise, and her fetishization of oriental culture as some society where everyone walks around doing Kundalini yoga and telepathically talking to birds and bears was laughable in retrospect. Apparently inspired by her works, Himmler sent a team to Tibet expecting to find a bunch of enlightened supermen and instead they found a bunch of alcoholic monks with rapant VD. Steiner was more grounded and factually correct, but he was a bit of a metropolitan egghead and packed the teeth needed to tear through millennia of dogma. We're long overdue for a new doctrine that speaks to the Faustian Aryan European spirit and they manufactured two brother wars and generations of psychological warfare to suppress that spark.

>>40921184 (OP)
you should get into alice bailey too

>>40921802
not ever knowing god and they beyond people toiled for 1000s of years playing video games on earth's surface while it cyclically rotated into a pole flip that yeets everything on the surface. Tribalistic monkey games w/ no ascension. A doomed fate.

>>40921184 (OP)

This is ground zero for New Age only difference is esoteric racism. So yeah if you want to be a Victorian New Ager then its a great book.

has anyone read her book on pistis sophia?

Mark Frost basically ripped the lore to Twin Peaks right from Isis Unveiled, down to the concept of "lodges" and a lower astral economy that trades in human misery as currency.

>>40921184 (OP)
It’s a good book but it’s not easy for dummies to understand. The writing can be a little too poetic but it’s message is worth it if you’re smart enough
>>40921198
Stop larping like you can read

>>40921184 (OP)
this is one of the highest level occult books there is. It filters 99.9999999% of the human population. You cant jump right into this book, you already need to pretty much be an initiate to understand it, which is why plebs deride it and her

>>40921820
This

>>40923690
go back to kitchen bitch

>>40921184 (OP)
>>40921234
>>40923717
Isis Unveiled is a better introduction to Blavatsky... The Secret Doctrine is somewhat dangerous, if not incomprehensible. There are few true Initiates in the world.

>The Secret Doctrine, abridged and annotated

... no, how dare you!

>>40921184 (OP)
It's made up nonsense but it is at times entertaining made up nonsense.

...

>>40923850
I wouldnt call it dangerous as, as I said, most people will never even really understand most of it and to the people that do, they already understand most of it already. It just adds some really rare gems to the mix imo. The root races stuff is where it really hits its stride imo. I believe she is right that evolutionists have it backwards. We started out as ethereal beings in a much less dense time and as the yugas change and things get more dense we shrank and became more dense as a consequence and if you understand the science of it all it seems pretty likely to be true.

>>40921234
>Lucifer
was the Roman deity for her, btw, not your literally fictional devil with the reappropriated name. Explained in great detail in the first essay of the first issue of her magazine of that title:
>https://iapsop.com/archive/materials/lucifer/lucifer_v1_n1_september_1887.pdf
All issues here:
>https://iapsop.com/archive/materials/lucifer/

brap: the book

>>40923931
>it seems pretty likely to be true.

that's the dangerous part: there's things that blavatsky says that are definitely not true, but only Initiates will be able to discern the blinds

>>40924113
>[Lucifer] was the Roman deity for her, btw, not your literally fictional devil with the reappropriated name

... trust me, you understood nothing Blavatsky wrote

>>40924177
shut the fuck up tripfag nobody cares whether you live or die, nobody is happy to see you, kill yourself

>>40923731
>reading makes you a girl
Fuck off illiterate trash

>>40924308
>29. Thus you may understand, that the Fire in the Light is a Fire of Love, a Desire of Meekness and Delightfulness; but the Fire in the Darkness is a Fire of Anguish, and is painful, irksome, inimicitious {hostile, unfriendly} and full of Contrariety in its Essence. The Fire of the Light hath a good Relish or Taste, but the Taste in the Essence of Darkness is unpleasant, loathsome and irksome. For all the Forms or Properties in the Eternal Nature, till they reach to Fire, are in great Anguish.

https://youtu.be/hV2-zFh3tAU

>>40924177
for a bit of clarity: Lucifer was much more than than the Roman deity for Blavatsky, and indeed, I am much more than a "literally fictional devil"

>>40926078
>As Venus has no satellites, it is stated allegorically, that Âsphujit (this “Planet”) adopted the Earth, the progeny of the Moon, “who overgrew its parent and gave much trouble”—a reference to the Occult connection between the two. The Regent (of the Planet) Shukra 55 loved his adopted child so well that he incarnated as Ushanas and gave it perfect laws, which were disregarded and rejected in later ages. Another allegory, in the Harivansha, is that Shukra went to Shiva and asked him to protect his pupils, the Daityas and Asuras, from the fighting Gods; and that to further his object he performed a Yoga rite “imbibing the smoke of chaff with his head downwards for 1,000 years.” This refers to the great inclination of the axis of Venus—amounting to fifty degrees—and to its being enveloped in eternal clouds.

https://youtu.be/Avi2zsaNSwk

>>40926078
>As Venus has no satellites, it is stated allegorically, that Âsphujit (this “Planet”) adopted the Earth, the progeny of the Moon, “who overgrew its parent and gave much trouble”—a reference to the Occult connection between the two. The Regent (of the Planet) Shukra loved his adopted child so well that he incarnated as Ushanas and gave it perfect laws, which were disregarded and rejected in later ages. Another allegory, in the Harivansha, is that Shukra went to Shiva and asked him to protect his pupils, the Daityas and Asuras, from the fighting Gods; and that to further his object he performed a Yoga rite “imbibing the smoke of chaff with his head downwards for 1,000 years.” This refers to the great inclination of the axis of Venus—amounting to fifty degrees—and to its being enveloped in eternal clouds.

https://youtu.be/Avi2zsaNSwk

Restricting Lucifer, or the Morning Star, to only the Roman deity misses the point entirely.