>>40939858 (OP)
Irony is, both cases is true.
It's ironic how people ready do defend the real "truth" to the fucking grave but no one really discuss what are the "truth" or "reality" concepts whatsoever. Everyone fighting their battles in the air.
If everyone have their own definition of what is real than who is wrong here? No one? Or everyone? Since they absolutely neglect to define the reality it self.
Paranormality exist as your thought exist inside your head, but thoughts on your head do not exist the same way the brick wall exist, yet no one question the existence and reality of both. Because of this, you'd be absolutely right to say so than
>>40939889, which will include anyone from both camps, those who say certain things exist and those who say those things do not exist.
Everything exist and everything is true, and if everything exist and true than nothing exist and nothing is true. This is a baseline from which all of the "lefts" and "rights" stem from, just depends on how much you willing to betray your own self.