Thread 40945723

What if there is massive difference reletively in time when you are dreaming? The consciousness could simply be ripped out from the body at light speed in order for a massive amount of time to pass in a instant. Like simulation theory only the machine running it is the same as the one being ran, just at a different speed

There is no such thing as "light speed".

>>40945736
Yes, speed is something observed undergoing a change. It doesn't necessitate time being there but the effects can be recorded on someone who is dreaming by comparing the length of the dream to the length of the sleep

This is a great question. I like it.
We're in a different interpretative and sensory state while dreaming.

* Recall (past memories surfacing from old triggers or just because)
* Analysis (current events requiring some subsumption and timing effect to deliver a different impact)
* Pseudorandom regurgitation of waking sensory overload
* Actual spirit travel or NHI (non-human intelligence) contact

In all of these, certain energetic predispositions to categorizing and identifying unknown, known, or analogous experiences tends to open opportunities for temperospatial divisions and concatenations unique to each session (each dream). This temperospatial timing (longer concatenations, shorter divisions) is among a small set of sensory accumulations we predict, in and to ourselves, while experiencing any of the aforementioned four types of dreams.

Those sensory accumulations, being in a relaxed and analytical or interpretive posture, are necessarily remembered and experienced as of longer or shorter duration than what we think of as a typical day or month, for the same reason that , when recalling SECTIONS of our lives or when recalling INTENSE scenes in our lives that we do not also remember every single newspaper clipping and video news channel and our boss's clothes that day or how we sewing our arms and how many swings per memory.

We allocate the energy of attention to our focu at the time of placement. Temperospatial details are of secondary concern until we specifically access works in which we know beforehand that they (time, space) are, there, in THOSE worlds, of primary concern.

>>40946129
What if time isn't analogue to any single body, there can be multiple exits out of the same hole that leads to the same place more then once all culminating into setting in stone the laws of nature you are witnessing