Thread 40950347

Conspiracy

Words like Semantics and Fundamental were input into our language system to confuse and suppress, for maleficent reasons.

Fundamental looks like someone just put fund-a-mental, you can even hum an 'under' and 'arm' out of that word. Different to words like core or volcano, which are cleaner.

Fundamental confuses philosophy of emergence, that we must for some reason worship something that's core because of it's principle. Also affirming base 10 maths and current society. Confusing the way we look at matter and fields. Don't pretend you understand what philosophy means via 'study of fundamental nature'--- we're all equally confused.

Core or basic is a better term, minus what equates to God or one corner worship.

What you want to believe that bad the playing field is leveled?

Nothing against you, but what exactly is core? Do you even know where 'you' are?

Everything around that is orbitals and subconstructs.

Study of core.

The things that are stand alone, that can exist without conscious minds.

The very base of our universe.

(That's not to say I couldn't come up with a new word and make a cleaner definition, but for now 'core' works).

It's only core when 'perceived' consciousness is considered in a given situation absent. But such a case is only theory, as consciousness is not limited to things that are born and die alone. As it has been debated that even some things that are (born) have no concept of actualization at all. Yet, a feeling that we stand in a reflection still lingers like a sixth sense.

>>40950401
Mmm grayon

>>40950428
You drew this for me? Im so proud. I'll put it on the fridge.

>>40950347 (OP)
semantics would happen without having a word for it

>>40950367
>orbitals and subconstructs
I have recently learned of the existence of orbifolds, and I think they are extremely neat.