Thread 40950435

Morality is a base of which measurements are made of the self, or a group, with the living standards in a particular locale(for example, Earth or society). Good is the correct measurement, and evil is the incorrect measurement. A greater good is a surplus and a greater evil is a deliberate moral failure.

Great Evil can be considered misguided action on purpose. Such as by taking a break mid sentence with no good reason, to add an insult, for all readers and who you're talking to, to decipher. It’s a bailing (like from a skateboard) with all your intention being channeled into a maleficent activity. This example is an example of life-less-ness and is an anti-life-force; and in society there's a lot of this going on.

Evil is something against the living standards of a particular locale, and it's specifically evil (maleficent) to that locale.

If there is a greater locale encompassing a lesser locale, and what's good and evil conflicts because they are not the same and their rules interject--- it's evil when it's against the greater locale's living standards.

Such as by cutting down all trees on the living planet, that would be an act of evil to the planet(though it may be good for society, they'd have a lot of wood).

The reason it is immoral in that case is because it would destroy both society and Earth, and consciousness couldn't progress.

There's not some mystical reason for that resolution.

Basically, evil is anti-life or in some cases anti-progress--- but there is a situational hierarchy. This means the most high morality over-rules the lower moralities(such as Earth being higher, in the situational hierarchy, than society; if something is immoral to Earth living standards in society living standards, then good and evil in society living standards is negated until the conflict is resolved).

>>40950435 (OP)
Good and evil are subjective. Cannot be correct or incorrect only a matter of emotions and not quantity of measurement, hence good measure is a weight of a sum, and not a specific amount.

>>40950462
Wtf am I reading?

>>40950469
I think the doggone will of Wayne Jackson

>>40950435 (OP)
shave that pussy!
>>40950462
evil is the imposition of will good is will willingly shared. you have to not know yourself to not know this

>>40950484
Alot of people thought bloodletting was a good thing....and also slavery...and also imprisoning your own family, also making people pay to release their dead friends from purgatory, also bringing your turd after laying one tonthe dinner table was a good time....arranged child marriage is considered great...wait, you mean YOUR version of good? How could I get confused?

>>40950492
dawwww the terms good and evil trigger your christian straw man, i actually loled
>wait, you mean YOUR version of good?
you think will is not objective? bet you cant define it ^
>How could I get confused?
you ignored the stated definitions cause you came here to strawman against your religioustisims

>>40950500
Good

>>40950500
Will is solely subjective. Ask the plants.
Don't put me in a box if you don't even know my label.

>>40950506
Subjective is another one of those maleficent words as exposed in my conspiracy thread. It's an excuse for an ego pitch. You got to feel strong there for no reason.

>>40950506
Who the fuck knows what this guy just said? Apart from those that look left and follow dictionary definitions and somehow click with sexual energy.

>>40950511
>subjective is another one of those maleficent words
>literally the antonym of objective
I'm sorry, with that argument, who's doing the ego pitch?

>ego pitch
I'm sorry, who is doing the ego pitch here?

>>40950514
Most good words make sense because they have inner-meaning. Volcano

Vol- vole, vo lug, voila
Cano - Kano, cane oh?!, can,

Semantics is a word that supposedly suppresses this truth, makes people seek dictionary definitions.

O - homer Simpson. Doh. It's all good lettering. It all creates a field.

>>40950516
Retard alert. GET OUT

>follows dictionary definitions
Bro thinks he's better than the dictionary.
You probably make up words too.

>>40950522
You're too old to be talking like a brat from 2007.

>>40950523
Better than the dictionary?

Are you not?

You literally submit to dictionaries.

>>40950506
will = intent actualized, your stuck on will = intent, but to actualize is to make real in the world. your philosophy on morality is poor.

>>40950527
Poor? Merely a matter of difference and thats the beauty of the subjectivity. You can CHOOSE to feel that way.

>>40950514
looking left can be fun butt have you tried moving left?
wolf

>>40950436
>>40950435 (OP)
If you want to entertain yourself, fuck shit up for the normies, it's one of the best forms of entertainment which 99% of the people can not partake in since they are shackled to the social norms. Destroy property, throw trash around, fuck shit up, be a nuisance every which way, but be armed though as the cattle will try to attack you so you have to be ready to defend yourself. There's a lot of other things you can do if you don't subscribe to social norms, you are literally free to do a lot of things, just don't get caught and over many years it will add up and you will see the fruits of your labor/pranks/mischievousness.

>>40950530
you defined will as something you cant define ie subjective, how coinvent for someone with nothing to say...
but theres nothing subjective in my terms, good will = the sharing of actualized intent, evil will = the hindering of actualized intent. only objects.

>>40950537
Not undefined, but multiple definitions. The clearest example is eastern philosophy vs western philosophy. How will or energy from within or chi, is extremely polarized in how it is one: manifested, and two: our purpose with it.

It all creates a field. Volcano. Voila can oh?!... Oh, Homer Simpson, DOH. Semantics, semi and ticks. Semi and tics. Say my antics.

>>40950537
Dammit, do you believe in a balance? Or do you hold a superman mantra that only good remains and that all evil can be objectively measured and some how, eliminated?

>>40950540
You get mad easily.

>>40950538
will = how a thing is polarized in how it is manifested with purpose.... ?
could you say that statement another way just to show your arnt parroting something you dont understand because.... again youve said nothing definitive. perhapz theres a reason just You think everything is subjective....
also, what do you mean the best example of a definition is found in... the comparison of 2 philosophies? like can you define will now in the juxtaposition of terms of eastern and western philosophy and define which parts of the comparison serve the best example of will? subtext - nothing youve said is definitve

>>40950542
>Dammit, do you believe in a balance?
when you ask this do you mean a balance of good and evil? if yes do you mean the terms in the subjective way youve failed to define them or the way ive defined them? if the latter then you can fuck your balance right off? i do not believe the world in any way requires an abundance of the imposition of will in like amounts to will willingly shared and thats fucking retarded to suggest, do you believe you body would function better if it had a 50 / 50 raition of cancer cells to healthy cells?

>>40950547
Fundamental is a life crime. I think it ties in with the holocaust though you'll likely be programmed to tell me otherwise here cause it's such a sensitive topic. The Holocaust was a framing of Hitler for the western crime and it targeted good thinkers. Think. Fundamental foo oooooooh under our one end all. Rhyming also with gas and free thinkers.

>>40950538
or even one little detail, how would you lable the polarity you mention, like would would you name the ends of the pole? north south, good evil, nice bad? + / -?

God is a much lesser maleficent word than fundamental, but God is, unfortunately, a maleficent word. Go die.
Go I done it. Guh oh d.
Gut the fish
Juh on duh

>>40950548
West: will is manifest by the individual
East: the way...

Holy airball

>>40950573
bark-on have you recently upgraded software? also im bored of the other guy plox accept 1 dog (fren not bride) for the first half of her life she lived in some chilly mountains and for the latter half a desert, only the tip of her tail has her original wool length, she was sheep ><

>>40950576
>West: will is manifest by the individual
im gonna ignore your "definition of east" and your lack of any examples that exist between them (seriously chat gpt why did you even say this garbage>>40950538?)

well now your getting closer to the thing i said 20 mins ago, outside your subjective terms (polarized internal energy) in your west will definition can you define what is being manifested by the individual?
mines easy, intent - what one wants (this Is subjective - its only in actualization that will gains objectivity)

dat loops nice

>>40950597
Evil mystic detected.

Ignored.

>>40950602
>Evil mystic detected
level 1 shaman /contemplated - you wont say how, nice flight response bro^

>>40950597
Ok. Ignore it. It doesn't change anything. Also, get mad. At me, and at chat gpt (for whatever schizo side rant that is).

>im gonna ignore your "definition of east"
Bro said it like it was going to hurt my feelings.

>>40950614
the best you can do is poorly authorize my emotive state as you flee with a statement of ignorance? (seriously dude you cared enough to stick your dick out there on this for the last hour and your just gonna pretend you cant ask hey what do you mean? ive been doing it this whole fucking time because you said something that dosent make sense to me, trying to figure out what other people mean with words is the basis of conversation - your ego is the poverty of your philosophy its why you cant say - i dont understand what do you mean?)

>>40950619
..... its da wae ;P

>>40950623
Ok, I'm going to pretend for a moment you're being genuine.

So if you wanted an elaboration, you should ask without the extra "this shit sound stupid gang" attitude because you get what you give. Also, you got to drop the ego. You're already speaking down to someone and you don't even know what I know, only what you know.

>>40950628
XD

>>40950639
Bingo and his evil mystic dance of ego

>>40950639
He's back everyone, and this time he's clean

>>40950639
>Ok, I'm going to pretend for a moment you're being genuine.
you didnt ask for any clarification on my statement here >>40950597, you gave me instructions i have no will to obey. your pretense is as poor as the definitions of your philosophy
>"this shit sound stupid gang" attitude because you get what you give
im going to take 2 of your statements and paraphrase them into a question, again as a test to see if your just a parrot
what polarity or chi or energy from within is manifested when a yee oldee doctor trepanned the skull of a sick man for the purposes of blood letting?

>>40950646
all bull shit aside that moment wrote itself mang^
....its the way :D

>>40950663
i fucked it!
>what polarity or chi or energy from within is manifested when a yee oldee doctor trepanned the skull of a sick man for the purposes of blood letting?
what polarity of* chi or energy from within is manifested when a yee oldee doctor trepanned the skull of a sick man for the purposes of blood letting?

>>40950676
Joy is a nice clean word in itself. Short, so good as a base when deciphering evil words. Juh oy yuh. God. Guh or yad.

>>40950693
illiterate is a nice clean word in itself.

>>40950699
Illiterate is an evil word. Ill luh hit or ate.

>>40950663
Just what is your goal? You're not making any sense and I'm being honest. Seriously:
>you didn't ask for any clarification on my statement..
Why are you upset about that?
>you gave me instructions I have no will to obey
Bro what are you actually talking about?
>your pretense is as poor as....
Bro leave the similes in sixth grade.
>test to see if your just a parrot
what polarity or chi or energy from within is manifested when a yee oldee doctor trepanned the skull of a sick man for the purposes of blood letting?
Bro acted on free will, and judging by your usage of this you must've not approved and this will line you with western philosophy: you probably think free will is a problem since will is, in your opinion, a manifested mindset based on intent, right? That is your belief. And my take, he was subjectively good natured. Just not smart. Bro you are a tart.

>>40950733
Oh, look, another hot steamy pile of shit to sift through.

>>40950796
But you enjoy it turdsniffer

>>40950733
>Just what is your goal?
to understand what you said here >>40950538
and youve finally defined one of the poles of your aforementioned polarity (perhaps youll define energy from within next - as more then chi?) in this most recent post
> And my take, he was subjectively good natured.
i agree! although the men in the images clearly suffer they almost certainly sought the servicers of the bloodletter (>>40950492 you compared too slaves imprisoning family bribery shittingonthetable and pedophilia.)
in good faith as the highest standard of medical care in their time... ie both parties willingly agreed. ie no imposition! a sharing of will willingly if you will
>Why are you upset about that?
why are you wrongly telling me what i feel again when you can barly understand what im saying?
>Bro what are you actually talking about?
>>40950639
what you said in this post, a genuine reply would have been you clarifying what part of my post you interpreted as a skizo rant, you didnt, just like your pretending to authorize my emotional state to have moral high ground in our conversation (in leiu of an argument)
>Bro leave the similes in sixth grade.
why?
as to the last bit, youve now described a good polarity chi, describe a bad/evil/- polarity chi, and lets see if it involve one imposing their will on another :D

>>40950703
honestly bro theres alot i could say but just take a long hard look at that dudes face again >>40950699