>>40980587 (OP)
information cannot be passed over and processed systems which process information in a different way.
assume afterlife of any kind exists.
it doesn't exist in any shape or form in our existence, otherwise death wouldn't appear the way it does nor manipulation of the mind wouldn't be possible via physical means. but that's not the point, "no it doesn't exist", because where's the fun in that? lets assume it does. so it has to be a separate system. system here is a very abstract term to describe a setting where things take place and the rules by it's able to take place. no information can be passed through these. it's like, taking a fish out of water and assuming it's able to breath because it does so in water. different systems have different rules, and information can be assumed to be subject to these rules.
the point of saying this is that you cannot send a machine to explore death. if you ask machine to record it's death, and you kill it by turning it off, you don't end up having this incredible information about life after it was shutdown. you end up with information how it died, and how it was suddenly brought back to life.
and that's the lesson of today. the only kind of life after death which is able to exist in our system as-is, is a bit mental belief that all consciousness is a effect. as an effect it cannot be destroyed any more than gravity or electricity. hence upon death you will instantly respawn but have no memories of past existence. your consciousness is same as ours.
people who speak of AIs don't really understand what they're talking about. they're talking about language models, which really just answer how they've been trained to answer. it's just a set of questions and answers. you can literally come up with an imaginary religion and teach your AI to believe it. It will answer, as if it believed every word. even if you yourself know it to be complete bullshit. so no, AI would not have the answer to your question.
