>>41045291 (OP)
Watched the first ~7 minutes of the first video "origin of secret societies", the chronology of European belief structures from Mother Goddess, to Polytheism, to Monotheism.
What does not make sense to me is how, only Agricultural Societies had a tendency towards feminine worship, due to its relation to fertility. In the greek pantheon, there's Athena. Why have war goddesses if feminine associations are only with fertility? What this guy needs to do is look at messaging these same societies put into media. Warhammer 40k, for example, has a chaos deity called Slaanesh:
>Wherever mortals are ruled by their own unquenchable desires, the Dark Prince of Chaos is there in the shadows, whispering, tempting, and feasting on a banquet of souls. But this is true in all things, not just carnal pleasures. Those who desire to indulge in the finest culinary delights, the most beautiful artworks, even the most sensual clothing, could all be amongst Slaanesh's disciples. Just as importantly, Slaanesh is also the god of perfection. The singer striving for the most beautiful song or the warrior who seeks the perfect fighting techniques, both could be devotees of Slaanesh.
"He" also has a feminine association to him, as he's also knows as "She Who Thirsts." And is associated with the number 6 (think to how the catholic church portrays the number 666, or 616). What I'm saying to you is that feminine energy is not this "soft", motherly thing in opposition to metal worker/warlike societies who revere the masculine. It's a much more complicated dynamic, and plays a massive role in things like how the human mind approaches material existence. Industrial society is not a technologically optimising society, necessarily, it's a sort of philosophy of existence - and these ways of living tie back to which ideology/belief system holds sway? The only true thing of consequence is the governed nature of all things. But if you knew even just aspects of that, you'd be something else.