>>41070535
>>41068569
>>41073302
i get that you are trying to post like the embodiment of the brainlet archtype so in a sense i appreciate what you are doing. but it should not need to be reestablished so many times that i'm not "scared" of them, i'm not a girl, i'm just a fucking observer. noooooticer. and
>>41071591 says it best. but also ugly art creates ugly people, ugly environments create ugly people. it's the same for you, your mind, the information you allow to enter it., and if you are laughing at one it means you have really and truly processed that image, and provided physical energy in response. it means the image in it's entirety is in your subconcious mind and unless you know of a technique to remove those memories, it's going to be in there for some time. obviously not in your active mind, you'll feel like you moved on or forgot about it very quickly after, but it's there. the message and image is there.
as for how this will affect you, i'm not really sure. but i feel symbols, images, songs, sounds, and other sensory things in which mental data is is something to consider. maybe if you find them funny you will seek them out, or collect them, and this will be a part of your personality and you think of the world and basedjaks, brainlets, apus, and pepes. like something nice happens and you mentally go "pepe moment!!" with a little mental image of OC pepe for that exact moment and you think of your emotions like omg im feeling so sadpepe today or omg im ragejaking so hard right now.
that would be fucking retarded so why even risk it by looking at these images so much. thats best case scenario, worst could be forces like mossad, evil, cia, nsa, using hidden images and hidden visual symbols behind them unseen that essentially beams something lightcoded into your retinas that activates certain biological functions mentally to occur behind the scenes. eventually to "activate" it remotely some way