>>41047700
i take breaks frequently, i'm not really terminally online. i'm just discussing my observations, i perfectly understand your line of reasoning and is generally how i perceive these images, but that's just one way of looking at them, you are making too many assumptions based off my desire to discuss other perceptions of these images. i'm not afraid of it hurting me, because i'm not of weak mind, but you can't operate on the assumption that constantly filling your mind with these images all the time is worthwhile either, they might be deemed "funny" but that's rather subjective, and like i said previously i do find them funny at times, but i also think farting and poop stuff is funny and that's not good, and people find rekt threads funny and i don't, i think it's still valid to discuss it beyond "it's just funny don't think too much bro"
>>41047705
i've seen plenty of terrible shit. bloodshow website as a kid, watching ladies shove live squids in their pussies, beheadings. i'm not "letting it effect me" by talking about how i find them to potentially have a deeper symbolic meaning. but the mere fact that it seems you assume i'm fragile minded and schizo about wojacks when i'm just discussing an idea, a nuanced way of perceiving these images rather than just face value funny meme. if you think it's not worth discussing how a direct, and highly mobile, increasingly abstract format of pushing symbols, ideas, messages, signals, to the masses via the medium of memes, memetic warfare as some have dubbed it, then you glow extremely bright and maybe there is more credence to this line of thinking than i initially even felt.
