>>41073410 (OP)
I think the opposite is true. What would be the point of a simulation this banal? I could spend 15 minutes flip-flopping on whether I want to jack it to bare soles or feet in white pantihose, all the while the system keeps track of the precise position of every single hair on my forearms and the dust motes out in the hall. Repeat ad infinitum for every single conscious mind and physical being in the universe.
What sane, rational being would create a simulation that produces such voluminous junk data? Utter nonsense. The banality is the refutation.