>>41255241
>Money laundering
This.
Especially if it's a cash business like a bodega, bar, laundry mat, "self serve" car wash, or event location.
Also many "stores" are really just real estate investments. The store doesn't have to be profitable; it just has to break even. That way the land owner can write down depreciation and all sorts of other accounting chicanery, while waiting for his land to "appreciate".
Rich people who own giant houses do something similar by planting an acre of corn on their land, and then claiming all sorts of tax breaks for farmers.
We are not in a Truman Show. Everybody is just gaming the system to the max before it all crashes down.
>>41255334
kek
>>41258428
In a small town, the shop owner probably OWNS the land his shop is on, and pays virtually nothing in property taxes (or utilities). If your expenses every month are like $200 it's easy to break even or even make a profit.
In a city there's always the landlord juice there with his hand out saying "fuck you, pay me". If your shop only makes $1000 profit per MONTH, you aren't going to make it.
>>41259518
Could be money laundering, but it could also be that the mall owner gets some sort of tax advantage by "being open" (with ONE shop), while he looks for a buyer (who will probably build shitty section 8 housing there).
>>41262220
when something in life doesn't make sense the answer is usually "lawyers" and/or "taxes" (and sometimes "crime").