← Home ← Back to /x/

Thread 41291580

10 posts 10 images /x/
Anonymous No.41291580 [Report] >>41291723 >>41291748 >>41292294 >>41293623
The Sensory Realm.
I am convinced that sensory perception is it's own dimension of reality. I think subjective phenomenology is not generated by the brain but conjured by it. I think it comes from somewhere outside time and space. It really can't be explained in terms of the 4 basic dimensions.. Experiential subjectivity is a very strange phenomena. I would say perception might even be it's own dimension of reality. The five senses may even be dimensions unto their selves, as they're so different from one another. Each primary color may even be a separate dimension.
Anonymous No.41291723 [Report]
>>41291580 (OP)
big brain take I unironically agree
Anonymous No.41291748 [Report]
>>41291580 (OP)
it fits the literal definition of dimension to classify each sense as a dimension of perception. colors would then be potential qualia within that dimension, like shapes and then more abstract things like motion and depth
Anonymous No.41292235 [Report] >>41292276
I also think the sensory realm may exist separate of the material realm, that it is interfacing material, objective reality
Anonymous No.41292276 [Report]
>>41292235
If sensory phenomena is the user interface, , though, what is the user? Is our core self a pure observer interfacing this reality through qualia encoded to the material realm via the sense organs? Where in local space does the sensory information from eyes get encoded to senses qualia. If the sensory realm is a non-spatial realm ultimately, then what is it about nerves in the brain that allow perceptive phenomena to access the brain? Sensory phenomena has really nothing to do with spatial dimensions, but visual qualia of color and shade allow human consciousness access to the spatial dimensions sensed by fight.
Anonymous No.41292294 [Report] >>41293501
>>41291580 (OP)
This doesn’t make sense because space and time are themselves experienced subjectively. You might as well just adopt solipsism
Anonymous No.41293501 [Report]
>>41292294
>This doesn’t make sense because space and time are themselves experienced subjectively. You might as well just adopt solipsism

It's not subjective but relative
Anonymous No.41293541 [Report] >>41293587
I would say I am a kind of solipsist. However, I don't ascribe to the view that my sense perception of my particular ego is the only experience in the universe. Rather, there is one unitary, lone being behind the cosmos that my and your and all sensory experience is ultimately derived and possibly experienced from.

If that primary mind is what we originate from, it is like a Father (or mother). We are all relatives though him (or her,). We are also relativities in motion and time. We are also relativities in consciousness.
Anonymous No.41293587 [Report]
>>41293541
Everything is relative! Relative in the sense of relationship. Relationships of bodies in space and relationary mental perceptions. Relations in society and family.
Anonymous No.41293623 [Report]
>>41291580 (OP)
It is called the mental plane, mental field, or quantum field. Consciousness is not inside the brain, consciousness is in the field. It is the sun which brings revelation. There is where you fight against the unconscious/unformed psychic aggregates which are not your thoughts, and are not yourself. The mental plane is the battlefield of emotions.