← Home ← Back to /x/

Thread 41307346

104 posts 34 images /x/
Anonymous No.41307346 >>41307442 >>41307537 >>41307570 >>41307628 >>41308326 >>41308336 >>41308340 >>41308360 >>41308444 >>41308645 >>41308803 >>41310867 >>41314938 >>41315184 >>41316300 >>41318982 >>41319156 >>41321588 >>41322739 >>41325880 >>41333429 >>41335434
Boeing 737 MAX hit by UFO in windshield at FL360
Something hit the windshield of a United Boeing 737 MAX cruising at FL360 (36 000 ft). Possible UFO ("drone"?) that hit it? What the fuck is there at 36k ft to even hit your damn windshield at mach 0.8? I don't believe a fucking meteorite could be the culprit, think of the chances.... It's some of this new "drone" shit that's been happening since the UK military base drones, then New Jersey and now also northern Europe.... Maybe the planetary surveillance system is slowly failing and we'll be seeing more and more of this kind of shenanigans because the "drones" are falling apart or malfunctioning or whatever, unable to cloak and hide and avoid collision.
https://avherald.com/h?article=52e80701
Anonymous No.41307348 >>41308645 >>41328689
Anonymous No.41307365
Anonymous No.41307374
Anonymous No.41307381 >>41307478 >>41307483
There's nothing to hit your windshield at fucking 36 000 ft, nothing.
Anonymous No.41307415 >>41319031
the only bird that flies so high is Rüppell's vulture. However, those are critically endangered and they live in Africa. The only confirmed incident at this altitude was in 1973.
Anonymous No.41307442 >>41307456 >>41307936
>>41307346 (OP)
rocks come off trucks all the time bro. fake
Anonymous No.41307456
>>41307442
Dumbie
Anonymous No.41307478 >>41308270 >>41308371 >>41308740 >>41315194 >>41319036 >>41322553
>>41307381
What is that on his wrist lol
Anonymous No.41307483
>>41307381
Birds that slonk that Charlie Kirk pack get that high
Anonymous No.41307537 >>41307712 >>41307919 >>41330546 >>41330553
>>41307346 (OP)
How did a sufficiently advanced alien ship fail to avoid a slow-ass plane? This is the same problem as the "pedo elites" being able to control everything except those things which would deny schizos a chance to catch them.
Anonymous No.41307570
>>41307346 (OP)
He hit an orb
Anonymous No.41307628 >>41308312
>>41307346 (OP)
A swancicle.
DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk No.41307712
>>41307537
>alien ship
Anonymous No.41307919
>>41307537
It hit it pretty much in the middle, has to be deliberate.
Æriel No.41307936
>>41307442
Lmao
Anonymous No.41308239 >>41308827 >>41328525
I dont know how this doesn't happen every single day. I live about 10 min from an international airport and these orbs are everywhere over my house and the rest of the sky every night. It's been like this for two years now. If I can see them dicking around in the sky from down here, I figure the pilots see them everywhere. I don't know any pilots though. It does seem like the orbs scatter if the planes get to close, and the military helicopters can be seen chasing drones and orbs around every once in awhile. But I haven't heard of any incidents. I threw some videos together as an example, ones I took when walking the dog. The video messed up at the end when I uploaded it for some reason so when the picture freezes thats it. But this happens every night. https://youtu.be/-hK2ryqG80A?si=YsNsZOLYwCRDUZ--
The Noticer No.41308270
>>41307478
Looks like a dog tag type thing in case he crashes and his body burns
Anonymous No.41308312 >>41319034
>>41307628
Wouldn't there be blood all over it?

I hope it's not start of anon prophecy part where planes suddenly start coming down
Anonymous No.41308326
>>41307346 (OP)
Probably a foreign military drone. Some officer in China is probably scheduled to be executed for losing an expensive toy in such a stupid way.
Anonymous No.41308336 >>41308412 >>41308689
>>41307346 (OP)
>mach 0.8
is this a thing? do people really say mach 0.anything?
Anonymous No.41308340
>>41307346 (OP)
Moose.
Anonymous No.41308354
namefag-41308270
Dumbass. It is a memorial bracelet for a battle buddy that died in combat.
Anonymous No.41308360 >>41308703
>>41307346 (OP)
Had no idea but given what Ryan Graves said that fighter jets had near misses with them it was a question of when it will happen, pic related is other strange hit
Anonymous No.41308371
>>41307478
Looks like bracelets people got when their friends died in mil, I think it says inherent resolve.
Anonymous No.41308412 >>41308418
>>41308336
Yes. At lower altitudes, airline pilots will use speed in knots, but at the higher flight levels they'll transition to speed in percentages of mach. Typically airliners will do speeds like mach .78 to .80. Faster business jets can do like mach .90.

>work in ATC
Anonymous No.41308418
>>41308412
cool thanks
Anonymous No.41308444 >>41308465
>>41307346 (OP)
>I don't believe a fucking meteorite could be the culprit, think of the chances
op i think you are a little out of touch
every day there are a few meteorites that hit earth and tens of thousands of planes in the air.
the chance of a meteorite hitting a plane would be tiny, but with enough time it was bound to happen eventually.

there is a very very big difference between improbable and impossible
Anonymous No.41308465
>>41308444
The Earth is a f(l)at gay(plai)ne.
Anonymous No.41308556 >>41308569
Saw my first weird nighttime drone with my own eyes last night. It was slowly just flying somewhere. Would stop for a bit every now and then before resuming. I'm in Roanoke Virginia.
Anonymous No.41308569 >>41308824
>>41308556
how big? SUV sized? take any pictures?
Anonymous No.41308645 >>41309296 >>41318854
>>41307346 (OP)
>>41307348
ok, as an actual aircraft mechanic who knows shit
I can tell anything hitting a plane at FL36 at mach 0.8, having any mass worth a damn, would completely wreck the plane and cause a major disaster
remember those birds who almost gtfo'ed a pilot back some time ago? yeah that probably wasn't far off from 200kts, right after take off

Planes are really meant to resist any sort of impact besides the casual bird, the exception being the windscreen for the pilot's safety (so they can continue piloting), and even then a bird and easily wreck it at relative low speed
The aircraft's airframe are really only meant to resist the pressure changes between different altitudes, but that's about it
anything worth a damn at FL36 would easily bring an aircraft down

as for what it could be, now your guess is good as any,
I will say though, there is a possibility that relative speed was low when it hit, as if the object was following along
Anonymous No.41308689 >>41308811
>>41308336
also to explains it more, like other anon said, the reason for this is because pressure changes drastically with those altitudes, wind speed is measured by the incoming air pressure, so to reduce calculation error, it makes more sense to use mach, because it already takes pressure into consideration
Anonymous No.41308703
>>41308360
This also makes no sense,
this is a regular boeing right, afaik most, if not all, planes use composite for their nose cone (to avoid radio shielding),
it shouldn't bend like that, and anything worth a damn in weight would wreck that shit
Anonymous No.41308740
>>41307478
It's a black pilots lives matter
Anonymous No.41308803 >>41311492
>>41307346 (OP)
As a guy who has spent over 70,000 hours in Microsoft flight simulator. I can say with confidence that this is likely just a bird, what most people don’t know is that the Colorado starling can reach heights of almost 40,000 feet, especially on their way south to Guadalajara.
The reason this is so spectacular is that it is the first time in human history that a bird has hit a windshield.
There have been near misses obviously, most famous, the one that happened just outside of Duluth where an albatross flew too close and had to be course corrected by the control towers near by obviously the cia doesn’t like it when their spy birds are wrecked especially if it calls into question the earths shape (it’s flat).
Anonymous No.41308811
>>41308689
>because it already takes pressure into consideration
hell yeah i love learning, thanks.
Anonymous No.41308824
>>41308569
No pictures (they would have looked like shit anyway). Hard to guess size from a distance in the dark I don't think it was that big. Maybe somewhat larger than a trash can lid in diameter?
Anonymous No.41308827 >>41308850
>>41308239

What the actual fuck is going on with the creature from your 'Morph' video? You included it at the tail end of your linked video too.

You don't even mention it. Could be someone in costume(or AI), but that's creepy as hell.
Anonymous No.41308850 >>41308921 >>41320904
>>41308827
Sorry I was worried I wouldn’t get enough exposure with just the orbs so I had Sora throw in a creature into my video to hopefully get traction.
I would have preferred if you commented that rather than posting here in /x/. I want to get a discussion going.
Anonymous No.41308921 >>41308966 >>41309261
>>41308850

I keep anon. I've been lurking for decades(this is technically my 3rd post ever). This whole 3I thing has the same signature as the Scamdemic. I didn't say much during that time, but all of my research and thoughts were eventually proven right.

Figured I'd have some involvement with this.

Told my wife back in mid-2024 that I felt something big was coming in 2025.

I've had extreme deja vu most my life(to the point in convinced life is cyclical and we live this life over-and-over), most of my biggest concerns have become reality, and I believe I was abducted when I was 6(which I've never told anyone).

I don't fixate on nearly anything and am skeptic of everything. 3I though? Can't shake my feelings.

I hope it's false, and all of this is some psyop or publicity stunt. I have a newborn and would love to watch her grow up. So it's not like I'm wanting things to happen/ change.
Anonymous No.41308966 >>41309232
>>41308921
I’m glad I’m not the only one feeling it.
I completely understand. Every major event in the past 8 years I’ve gotten right.
I found that when I had something to live for I was better at following my gut.

What is it you’re feeling? Right now I can’t pin it down to a specific circumstance or event but with shit in the sky, shit in politics, it seems like we’re at the same point in geopolitical tension as the Cuban missile crisis.
Anonymous No.41309109 >>41318868
737 pilot here, I wanna know what happened to the FO (copilot) if the Captain is as rough as it shows. I wouldn't be surprised if the dude is blind from getting glassed in both eyes. This is scary as fuck and a fact of life that there's always a small chance you get glassed while flying. fyi 737s usually cruise between M0.76-0.795, max mach is M0.82 and cruising alts usually top out at FL370, but can be as high as FL410 if you're really light. The jet was literally hit by an flying object that was not identified, but getting hit by a UFO is bullshit.
Anonymous No.41309232
>>41308966

For me it's when they decided to lock down the data from the window of closest observation regarding Mars. I was super stoked to get some intel from that window, and I was shocked when the government shutdown impacted that. Didn't help they locked files for 74 years. I'm still skeptic and that it could be a generic placeholder.

Timing is a little to convenient. Add it to the pile of other improbabilities surrounding this event/object.

Not to mention there are plenty of non-US parties that have the ability to observe this object and report. Where have they been? ESA basically mocked anyone calling this more than a rock. Then provided a pixel image that was unhelpful. Private observers with limited resources are doing more to provide information on this event.

My 'bullshit' meter is off the charts, and I'm waiting for something to happen(hoping nothing does though). Be it a manipulation of public attention to do something else, or maybe they realized this was something beyond their grasp/control and decided to just let it pass by instead. After all, anything that breaks down people's held beliefs will lead to a societal collapse.

Not a big fan of typing things out as I don't feel I can clearly convey my 'instinct' regarding this event. But I'm trying my best.
Anonymous No.41309261 >>41309352
>>41308921
>This whole 3I thing has the same signature as the Scamdemic
>all of my research and thoughts were eventually proven right.
As in the vaxx was poison all along?
I don't get how anons can come on /x/ every day saying "I knew the vaxx would kill people!" when that isn't happening.
I work in a hospital and every staff member needs to be fully vaxxing for everything. I didn't die, none of my coworkers died, some of the boomer big bosses have been their for 40 years and are still kicking. All had at least 4+ booster shots as required by law.

When do people start dying?
Anonymous No.41309296
>>41308645
Shut up, Ethan.
Anonymous No.41309352 >>41309381
>>41309261

I never said it would kill people. You made that assumption.

The statement was more geared towards the control and manipulation implemented globally. I even lost a job over it.

You also had the same data control we are seeing with 3I. Which is why I made the comparison in the first place. Pfizer wanted a similar timeline to keep the information under lock-and-key.

But we appreciate you showing you are a midwit working in the medical field. As someone that just had a daughter in the NICU for 113 days, I can safely say that most people in that industry are morons who are too smug because they have a degree in medicine. Which the Chinese have been practicing for 3,000 years. Should follow suit and only pay the doctors once someone is successfully treated. Instead, y'all are in on a scheme to manipulate contracts through insurance and treat symptoms so you have reoccurring customers. (Derailed, but I fucking hate people in the medical profession. I'm 40 and healthier than anyone I know and haven't stepped into a doctor's office since I was 16)
Anonymous No.41309381 >>41331518
>>41309352
>most people in that industry are morons who are too smug because they have a degree in medicine
>a scheme to manipulate contracts through insurance and treat symptoms so you have reoccurring customers
>Derailed, but I fucking hate people in the medical profession.
My post was bait but holy shit do you get it.
Trvth nvked
Anonymous No.41310867 >>41310959 >>41326129 >>41330640
>>41307346 (OP)
there was a video last year, a parked 18 wheeler truck was hit by an "orb", which was caught on the security camera. the orb hit the cabin like a cannon ball, then instantly shot back out as if it had bounced. the truck was wrecked. what can we learn from this?
Anonymous No.41310959 >>41326129
>>41310867
Requesting immediately for the video this anon mentioned.
Anonymous No.41310995 >>41311002
It was a GoPro with GPS attached to a balloon
Anonymous No.41311002 >>41311082
>>41310995
Says who?
Anonymous No.41311082
>>41311002
It came to me in a dream
Anonymous No.41311492
>>41308803
Have a (you)
Anonymous No.41312423
bump
Anonymous No.41312439
stray bullet from some nigger infested neigborhood. obv
Anonymous No.41314768
probably a piece of space debris from an old satellite or a chinese space station
Anonymous No.41314938
>>41307346 (OP)

Pete Hegseth's plane had to make an emergency landing in the UK this week because of a cracked windshield.
Anonymous No.41315184 >>41325002
>>41307346 (OP)

Here's another weird plane incident:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c5y0e4e5ddxt

So the United plane, Hegseth's plane, and this one at Hong Kong inside a week.
Anonymous No.41315194
>>41307478
KIA bracelet
Anonymous No.41316300
>>41307346 (OP)
Giant paper clip looking drones....my God!!!
Anonymous No.41318854
>>41308645
>I can tell anything hitting a plane at FL36 at mach 0.8, having any mass worth a damn, would completely wreck the plane
The question is what in the fuck would actually be at FL360
>inb4, birds have been known to fly that high
Yeah, I've heard that and I'm calling bullshit on that too. The temperatures and lack of O2 makes that near impossible.
>remember those birds who almost gtfo'ed a pilot back some time ago?
Near the ground and we were talking an entire flock of them.
>Planes are really meant to resist any sort of impact besides the casual bird
Depends on the area. Fuselage, empenage, and wings dont usually get hit because of aerodynamic flow at high soeeds. Which should have protected this plane too.
>the exception being the windscreen for the pilot's safety
Which is why this is significant. Its usually not a place that would get hit by a bird and its reinforced, and you have a billion screws and nut plates, and you have double-paned glass. Even at Mach .8, I dont think you'd see that kind of damage.
>anything worth a damn at FL36 would easily bring an aircraft down
Thats the point, nothing should be flying at that altitude that isnt man-made.
Anonymous No.41318868 >>41325002
>>41309109
>The jet was literally hit by an flying object that was not identified, but getting hit by a UFO is bullshit.
If it wasnt some kind of craft, what was it?
Anonymous No.41318953
so instead of missiles we need to ram em with boeings? got it, buying all the stocks of boeing rn

my theory as to what hit em; unironically a big chunk of hailstone of sorts, we might need a meteorologist kek, if it was an actual metallic "orb" or an ayy ship, that plane wouldn't survive the impact

maybe the climate is changing in a way that's making it even more dangerous to fly at that high of an altitude? based on the fact there are other planes reporting cracked windshields or mysterious impacts
Anonymous No.41318982
>>41307346 (OP)
Should have read that NOTAM, bitch
Anonymous No.41319031 >>41322721
>>41307415
so thats probably not what it was then, huh?
Anonymous No.41319034
>>41308312
After impact at such speeds? Unlikely.
Anonymous No.41319036
>>41307478
some sort of Jewish bracelet
Anonymous No.41319156
>>41307346 (OP)
Proyecto Yaperclip?
Anonymous No.41320904
>>41308850
>I had Sora throw in a creature into my video to hopefully get traction
you're a fucking retard for that
Anonymous No.41321588 >>41322925
>>41307346 (OP)
wtf is with this giant paper clip? sorry but this is AI slop lmao
Anonymous No.41322553
>>41307478
friendship bracelet from the copilot c:
Anonymous No.41322721
>>41319031
off course this is what it was, retard.
an ufo hitting the windshield of a plane makes the plane go boom.
Anonymous No.41322739 >>41324152
>>41307346 (OP)
>think of the chances...
The fact that there's a chance means that it could have eventually happened, and here it is. That argument only (barely) works if this happens again. It's the funniest shit in the world to see people rule something out as impossible when it was merely improbable.
Anonymous No.41322823
It was a plummeting Starlink satellite you goons, get a grip.
Anonymous No.41322925
>>41321588
paper clip is some slop watermark a loser on bluesky used on images he stole from instagram
Anonymous No.41324152 >>41329913
>>41322739
Except the same thing happened last December at close to the same altitude. Metal object hit the engine cooling

https://simpleflying.com/gulfstream-g550-mid-air-collision-27000-feet/
Anonymous No.41324487
As if a UFO driver is dumb enough to hit a plane.
Anonymous No.41324567 >>41328702
https://x.com/johndeanl/status/1980462264974209292

It was a weather balloon. Thanks for shitting up the board tho
Anonymous No.41325002 >>41327713
>>41315184
The USAF C-32 (B752) having a window crack is not an uncommon occurrence, and is a big deal because you do not want to feel the wind on your face at +30k ft, especially over the water. Sometimes the windows shatter on these older jets due to age, thermal stress, or the electric window heaters go apeshit. I've personally never had it happen to me.

>>41318868
Go to for me is literally a bird. And birds at FL360 would be YUGE, but also would get vaporized getting smashed at M0.76 or above. I've personally hit big bugs above 30k feet, it's weird having a giant bug stain appear at cruise but it happens. Sounds like a literal weather balloon may have hit it, I 100% believe it's a possibility unironically. We have something in aviation called "Big Sky Theory" that was the basis for lack of air traffic control, because the sky is big, planes won't hit each other, right? Until too many planes hit each other at altitude and killed to many, eventually you're just gonna get a bad roll and smash into something retardedly small at altitude, it's just bad luck and big sky theory doesn't work to separate traffic.
Anonymous No.41325880 >>41327768
>>41307346 (OP)
UFO confirmed
Anonymous No.41326129 >>41330640
>>41310867
>>41310959
https://youtu.be/z6YmBa9dYIA
Anonymous No.41327713 >>41328689
>>41325002
>Go to for me is literally a bird.
I would think some microscopic trace of organic matter would have been left over from a bird. Blood under/between cracked glass or something like that.
>but also would get vaporized getting smashed at M0.76 or above
Wouldn't the plane have so much kinetic energy that it almost wouldn't damage the plane at that speed? Like how a high power bullet doesn't fragment or mushroom at high velocities.
>Sounds like a literal weather balloon may have hit it
Anon ... I can't fucking even. This has to be a joke. Also, wouldn't the aircraft radar give you some kind of alert? A weather balloon would definitely show up on radar
>"Big Sky Theory" that was the basis for lack of air traffic control
But Big Sky is mostly true, especially above 18k feet and aways from large cities and airports. And this is the second Big Sky even in less than a year (G550 in Decemeber 2024).
Anonymous No.41327768
>>41325880
Abso-fucking-lutely.
With all those cuts to the US national weather programs, you think weather balloons are still being used?
Anonymous No.41328525
>>41308239
what is the music?
Anonymous No.41328689 >>41329404 >>41330090 >>41334378
>>41327713
>organic matter left over
In the picture of the exterior >>41307348 there's some red staining at the top of the R1 window. Not to mention that the jet could've flown through significant precip while diverting to SLC, which can wash everything off, assuming it was a bird
>kinetic energy no damage
I'm a pilot, not a physicist or crash test dummy operator. Try the ballistic experts on /k/.
>no way hombre
a weather balloon isn't an unlikely possibility, given how remote chances are of hitting anything up there, and the fact that these dudes obviously hit something solid. I haven't seen anything beyond a balloon owner saying "I think it was mine" but it's about one billion times likely than space debris.
>Radar would detect it
No it wouldn't. Weather radar detects precip across hundred of miles, not a little balloon less than a square yard in area, likely much smaller. TCAS overlays are not using radar to detect other aircraft, that's run via the transponder. Maybe a fighter could detect it, but that's not my knowledge base, nor is it relevant to a 737 MAX.
>G550 hit in Dec 2024
Hadn't heard of this one, and I won't rule out the possibility of hitting a small drone for either case. I'm not here to provide dubious speculative answers, I'm just telling you what's bullshit. I'm holding out for some supposed weather balloon location & altitude data from this CEO guy.
Anonymous No.41328702
>>41324567
may I see it?
Anonymous No.41329404 >>41330090
>>41328689
>there's some red staining at the top of the R1 window
So why is the FAA calling it a weather balloon if there is blood on the windshield?
>I'm a pilot, not a physicist or crash test dummy operator
So then why do you have an opinion on this at all? It's a unique incident. If you aren't willing to speculate as to what it is, you clearly wouldn't have any experience with this and would have nothing to add.
>a weather balloon isn't an unlikely possibility
Yes it is. Jesus Christ we have morons flying planes.
>No it wouldn't. Weather radar detects precip across hundred of miles, not a little balloon less than a square yard in area
Depends on the radar. Some of them self-attentuate (change PRI, Scan Rate, etc.) and in clear condictions would give you a return, but it sounds like you are an auto-pilot monkey like most pilots these days.
>G550 hit in Dec 2024
I posted a link in the thread. Look it up if you are interested. Metal object damaged the engine cowling at 27k feet off the Florida coast.
My main problem with your posts is you seem to not be saying a fucking thing
>It's totally not a UFO guys, trust me I'm a pilot. I cant tell uou what it is but its totally not a UFO.
Which is fucking absurd logic.
Anonymous No.41329533
@41329404
jej faggot, I can't help if you have zero reading comprehension with the ability to use grok. Why don't you let the big boys talk and get ready for ICE to deport your ESL ass. Google AI can't make you sound like less of a copy pasting zoomie, try saying something of interest without your breath smelling like jizz. You have no jet time.
Anonymous No.41329913
>>41324152
I concede, anon.
Anonymous No.41330090 >>41333193
>>41328689
>>41329404
Real Pilot here.
I am a faggot, ok?
Anonymous No.41330546
>>41307537
You're a fucking moron.
Anonymous No.41330553
>>41307537
how does roadkill happen if cars are faster than a slow ass animal

stop posting lurk more newfag
Anonymous No.41330640 >>41330994
>>41310867
>>41326129
ay yo wtf was that thing
Anonymous No.41330994
>>41330640
That’s just an orb. I wouldn’t worry about it!
Anonymous No.41331518
>>41309381
Why the fuck would you think parroting establishment bullshit/r*ddit "well akshually XD" crap is "le ebin bait XD lololol gottem"
You're an actual fucking faggot. We've all had that shit pumped down our throats for five years and you think it's funny to pretend to be one of those cocksuckers? It's "bait"?
Well congratulations consider me baited you fucking faggot.
Anonymous No.41333193 >>41333365
>>41330090
fake pilot here
I love mature navajo bitches
anon No.41333365
>>41333193
NOTHING LIKE A GOOD OL NAVAJO MILF
Anonymous No.41333429 >>41335385
>>41307346 (OP)
Could it have been ice? Obviously too high for a bird. I seriously doubt it was a meteorite. Seems like that would have done a tremendous amount of damage, more so than what occurred.
Anonymous No.41334378 >>41335372
>>41328689
Google bird plane stike for more. There should be blood and gore. The red stripe you are referring to is the inside frame of the window
Anonymous No.41335372
>>41334378
So that bird strike in the picture is a low altitude strike and the aircraft are usually going a bit slower. That's what most bird strikes are like. The incident OP is referring to was high altitude and higher speed. You wouldn't expect to find large chunks present from the bird given the speed, and altitude. I think you would find smaller bits of organic material and maybe some blood visible using liminol. The cracks and dent just under the windows frame would have probably preserved something, even if it wasnt visible with the eye.
Anonymous No.41335385
>>41333429
>Could it have been ice?
You know how when you fly you go above the clouds when you are at cruising altitude. Those clouds are precipitation and any hail or ice would come from those clouds. It likely wasn't ice due to the altitude.
Anonymous No.41335434 >>41335580
>>41307346 (OP)
It was nothing. Because nothing ever happens.
Anonymous No.41335580
>>41335434
Except something did happen. Stuff like this is the best evidence of paranormal or government conspiracies because it mostly flies under the radar. It's just some minor damage to an aircraft, no lives were lost, and most people are happy to accept birdstrike or weather balloon as an explanation. That being said, the devil is in the details. The incident logically and legitimately defies rational explanation. You could maybe argue that a freak meteor or falling satellite debris could explain one incident, maybe. But you have two incidents in less that a year and that's beyond improbable. I personally believe it's government related. The December incident occurred simultaneous to the drone sightings on the East Coast. Nevada, clearly has secret government facilities. What it means is some government (be it alien or human) is flooding our skies with so many high altitude drones that they are colliding with aircraft. It's a pretty big happening if you actually think about it.