>>41311178 (OP)
Africa is not the cradle of humanity. Europe is. As more paleontology work is done, the more this gets proven. The oldest upright-walking primate found in Europe pre-dates any in Africa by approx. 120,000 years. And there's the point of contention with trying to determine the source of RH-blood, which absolutely did NOT come out of Africa like RH+ blood did.
Also SE Asian doctors discovered that underneath brown eyes are blue eyes. Doctors are trying to rationalize the discovery while maintaining the "oficially accepted" narrative that blue eyes are a genetic accident, but more than likely blue eyes came first, is a trait inherited from Neanderthal, and brown eyes are hot-climate adaptations that came afterwards.
The "African" Genome comes from a pre-human species that's exclusively theirs. Different races evolved from different pre-human species (Cro-Magnon, Neanderthal, Denisovan, Proto-Australoid, and Homo Erectus). That is why different races exist.
It's not racist nor a judgment for/against any given race. It's just the science of filling in the holes in humanity's history. There is still a common ancestor though because that "Midochondrial Eve" is what made all forms of humans inter-breedable with each other. It's just that the likelihood of that ancestor originating in Africa as well as how far back that ancestor existed is up in the air now.
The only point that can be argued and absolutely get ashitstorm argument back is the possibility that Black people may be the last race and not the first race to walk the planet. It shows with evidence like them being the only ones who have yet to develop a pre-frontal cortex in their brains. But the counter-argumen against that is sharks, which pre-date the dinosaurs by millions of years, yet have still yet to evolve to have a diaphram to help their breathing, and have still yet to develop a bone skeleton.
So there's a lot to discuss as long as people aren't using it for any racist purposes.
