>>41316490
>Don't lecture me
attempted authorization denied hypocrite, you began this conversation with a lecture, if there was any merit in your words you would have lead via example.
>I rely on no one and expect nothing from anyone
how will you achieve power sufficient for "victory" ?
> and I do not bet on loyalty.
dat f[r]oidian slip
> I have nothing to hide
no ones insinuating you have "this was evident in the merit of your previous statement alone."
> I come to you openly and honestly.
too attempt to authorize the nature of morality and power in responce to a statement about why you cant save someone who dosent seek you out because you were triggered by the definition of evil - the imposition of will
ps, cause you clearly dont care; good - will willingly shared
>My ideal society would be a collection of associations of egoists bound only by mutual benefit.
thats actually based as fuck
>That is what the weak say when they are forced to submit. Power writes morality. To impose will is not evil or good, it is simply victory.
just ignore this shit and start living your ideals and through your exemplarily success alone others will flock to you on merit
pps if your not a stranger to mutualism why you say shit like
>If one does not impose their will, then one is merely imposed upon