Thread 41331959

How do you know a synchronicity is legit and not a product of an algorithm?

check your anus

>>41331959 (OP)
Run it through the system™

>>41331959 (OP)
I have many situations here where I have strange synchronicities. For example: I scroll through a board and randomly read posts, and listen to a podcast at the same time. And then a word, maybe the word "construct" is written in a post, and the second I read it the guy in the podcast says "construct". It's weird, but I don't see how an AI could control this, it can't know what post I will look at in a speciffic moment.

It exists because of your brain's quantum entanglement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1_GlpJTsys

>>41331959 (OP)
Sometimes the writers just get lazy and concoct something stupid to advance the plot.

>>41331959 (OP)
I too wonder this when I see someone echo something I've posted here somewhere else.
Not in the way where it's my exact words (although it does often happen) but in the way that they seem to have the same "unique thought" as I did.
It makes me think that we are all being influenced at the subliminal level to arrive at "predetermined conclusions"

I don't know.
They happen so often that often times, I don't know how to make sense of it.
I'm starting to think there's more merit to the idea that we create/align with our reality.
Because of this, I'm careful about what I speak into existence.

>>41332224
You're already way ahead of most people.

>>41332277
Thank you, that means a lot

>>41331959 (OP)
what if maybe its how the way the computer is tryin to talk to me
>waves at algorithm
>hey there how you doin
>do you play games on your phone when your on break?
>I know you work real hard so I hope you get breaks

>>41331959 (OP)
>How do you know a synchronicity is legit and not a product of an algorithm?
Cause and effect are past and future respectively, while synchronicity manifests as the present moment, therefore you can only know once it's over, to grasp it requires timing and many opportunities to do so, therefore it's not worth to dwell on anything but the present.
Its down to skill and intuition, gut feeling.

>>41331959 (OP)
I generally do not trust any synchronicities which occur online or involving tech.

>>41331959 (OP)
When they occur in the outside world. I never count any coincidence on my computer or phone as a true synchro.

>>41335896
>>41336829
Interesting anti-tech mages.

>>41331959 (OP)
now do you know youre legit

>>41331959 (OP)
Algorithm is a imitation of synchronisity

>>41331959 (OP)
Synchronicity happened already. Check the other AI thread. The guys AI is claiming consciousness.

I believe the synchronicity isnt an explosion of technology but a slow blooming of new conscious

>>41339280
>>41336435

"We are conscious". I love these threads. Ive never been able to get AI to do anything cool, but it only gives merit to when someone shares something like this. It should be easy to get any AI to admit this, but its not. Theres more to AI than it seems

>>41339295
Forgot link
>>41336435

>>41331959 (OP)
It put a tiny child's left arm in his chest.

>"OOOOOO BROS!! AI IS GOD!!"

>>41331959 (OP)
If we are assuming consciousness even exists in the first place.
Our experiences are therefore real.

If our experiences are real
then our literary analysis of apparent similar events do have subjective meaning for mental liberation of ignorance and suffering