>>41398054
my placeholder theory was that i've been gaslit into believing that there was no proof of Roy Jay's existence even though it was not the case and most people including me wouldn't bother to check it further.
it would mean that anybody who claimed in the original thread that there was no wikipedia entry, the reverse image search didn't work etc. was one of the original larpers who entertain the idea that Roy Jay does not exist, just to let him be freely rediscovered prooving the OPs point about Roy being a retroactive demon.
when I first heard about Roy Jay in that thread I thought it was just some anons psyop to meme a guy into existence.
I thought it was pointless and that his catchphrases seemed fake af.
but i can't wrap my head around it, either to meme somebody into existence or to meme somebody out of existence so he can be rediscovered like some ME residue
