← Home ← Back to /x/

Thread 41454577

18 posts 4 images /x/
Anonymous No.41454577 [Report] >>41454887 >>41454924 >>41455521
"no emp" "fake"
4chan says EMP would have destroyed the cellphones so it's fake
Copilot said

That claim is misleading—cellphones can survive a nuclear EMP, especially if they’re not connected to power or shielded by surrounding materials. So footage of a nuclear-like explosion captured on phones is not automatically fake.
Why Cellphones Can Survive an EMP

EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) from a nuclear blast can damage electronics, but the effect depends on:

Altitude of detonation: High-altitude bursts produce widespread EMP; ground-level blasts have more localized effects

.

Distance from the blast: EMP strength drops with distance. A phone several miles away may experience little to no disruption.

Shielding: Phones in pockets, cars, or buildings are partially shielded from EMP effects

.

Not plugged in: Devices connected to power grids are more vulnerable. A phone running on battery is less likely to be damaged

.

Real-World Testing

A 2022 study by SEMPRE and Jaxon Engineering found that commercial smartphones like the iPhone 12 and Galaxy S21 Ultra survived EMP testing

.

These tests suggest that modern phones have some resilience, especially when not exposed directly or when shielded.

Why 4chan Might Say It’s Fake

Trolling culture: 4chan often spreads misinformation or oversimplified “debunkings” to stir debate.

Gatekeeping: Dismissing footage as fake based on flawed logic is a way to control narratives or mock outsiders.

Misunderstanding EMP physics: Many assume EMP is an instant, universal electronics killer—this is a Hollywood myth, not scientific reality

.

Bottom Line

Footage of a massive explosion, even one resembling a nuclear blast, can be real and captured on cellphones. The presence of video doesn’t disprove the event—it just means the conditions weren’t sufficient to fry nearby electronics.
Anonymous No.41454594 [Report]
Nobody cares russoid
Anonymous No.41454887 [Report]
>>41454577 (OP)
I hate immigrants from /pol/ so much. They just don't stay in their containment board. We should round them all up and put them in certain camps. Good for nothing subhumans
Anonymous No.41454923 [Report]
The explosion in Beirut was a nuke. What makes one think they are not using it in Ukraine?
Either they are using them or nukes dont exist and it was always fear porn.
Anonymous No.41454924 [Report] >>41454956 >>41455076
>>41454577 (OP)
i've seen so many posts on this and i can only assume they're all from you
you seem really hung up on this topic
the US (and probably other countries) have nuke detectors in orbit. any use of a warhead would be known by means other than cell phone video.
why would:
- this location be nuked, knowing that everyone would notice such a strike?
- this nuclear detonation be kept secret by the world at large?
- there be a limited exchange of one warhead in a limited place like this?
- we bother to take notice of a potential nuclear strike, given all of the above?
your pictures are useless until you can start to answer those lines of questioning sensibly
also, stop posting AI slop and think for yourself
Anonymous No.41454956 [Report] >>41455150
>>41454924
It's more likely a bunch of glowniggers, overestimating the impact of 4chan outside of /pol/ and annoying the three schizos here who just want to talk about aliens and shit. A single person would have taken the hint by now. This thread pops up several times a day and OP always gets told to fuck off
Anonymous No.41455068 [Report] >>41455129
Russia has been nuked a few times now that's why they keep pussy footing around in Ukraine. Lebanon has been nuked too, so have Syria, and Yemen. Modern new generation nukes are very clean and don't leave the lingering radiation or fallout of old nukes. This is common knowledge among intelligence it's kept from the public because they would freak out. Much better for both sides to pretend it didn't happen then everyone saves face and avoids civil outrage.
Anonymous No.41455076 [Report] >>41455150
>>41454924
The irony of a reddit tier retard posting "think for yourself". I can smell your triple vaxxed status through the screen.
Anonymous No.41455129 [Report] >>41455181
>>41455068
Basically this. And they keep saying it was a "ammo depot" which got destroyed. Always a ammo depot, they think we are dumb to believe it.
I remember a ukrainian filmed one of these explosions from his apartment, the mushroom cloud was very clear.
Anonymous No.41455150 [Report] >>41455227
>>41454956
something about the message and method makes me think its just a single person who is convinced they are a lot smarter and more observant than the rest of the world without ever taking the next step of thinking though the implications of what they've "discovered"
if this is part of a broader effort, i really can't fathom the point of it
>>41455076
so did you have a point or do you just like posting this video?
it might be obvious to you, but please explain why we're supposed to care like we're the morons you think we are
Anonymous No.41455181 [Report]
>>41455129
Especially because the type of munitions they told us were stored there use stable modern propelent and warheads that do not explosively cook off, they burn. Also every modern depot is designed to avoid total catastrophic losses from fires or explosions, that lesson was learned in the napoleonic era. So for everyone who knows they are telling us in a roundabout way that it wasn't a depot explosion.
Anonymous No.41455227 [Report] >>41455270
>>41455150
You're confusing me with OP, I don't care much about his video. The ones from Yemen are a lot more compelling. But video doesn't matter when we have the data from EURDEP and CTBTO IMS, you not knowing about that and still commenting on the issue is why you're a moron.
Anonymous No.41455270 [Report] >>41455305
>>41455227
>But video doesn't matter when we have the data from EURDEP and CTBTO IMS
can we see it? that's be a lot more reasonable than you just implying it exists after OP made no mention of it
also if your line is "we've been nuking each other the entire time just with no targeting of population centers or production of fallout" then many of my initial questions still stand
Anonymous No.41455305 [Report] >>41455329
>>41455270
> no targeting of population centers or production

This is why I won't take you seriously. We nuked the capital city of Yemen and one of Russia's main propelent plants and here you are asking why we haven't nuked anything of strategic value. You may consider reading something about a subject before entering conversation on it, especially if you intend to come in with such a dismissive attitude. I have you all the info you need to verify, look it up.
Anonymous No.41455329 [Report] >>41455391 >>41455426
>>41455305
>asking why we haven't nuked anything of strategic value
don't put words in my mouth to win an argument, i said "targeting of population centers" and "production of fallout"
i guess english isn't your first language?
civilians only care about nukes because of the fear of indiscriminately targeting cities and poisoning the air - if none of that is happening and they're just really big bombs being used in a war, why should we care?
Anonymous No.41455391 [Report]
>>41455329
You don't really need to care. Modern nukes are very safe and will become normalized in warfare over the next few decades. Since the first one went off a bunch have been used and within certain circles it is already accepted as part of the equation. What you might care about is that NATO governments are enabling the use of nuclear weapons against other countries including civilians and lying to their populations about it. Some people might also care if they are politically aligned against US and Israeli expansionism. It was Israel & Saudi Arabia who nuked Yemen in a joint operation, they used an Israeli warhead on a GBU based delivery system purchased from the US, dropped from an F-15I. Whereas Russia was hit by Ukraine using American targeting and cruise missile systems. Technically we didn't nuke either, we just sold the gun, the ammo, and the training to do it.
Anonymous No.41455426 [Report]
>>41455329
4th generation nukes don't produce fallout. The efficiency is high enough that all the radioactive material is consumed in the reaction and while radiation like gamma rays are emitter in the blast it does not linger in particles. They can also be extremely low yield so they are more of a localised or precision weapon and detonated at low altitude or even underground, in which case the result is more like a super massive conventional bomb with far greater penetrative power against reinforced targets like bunker systems. The approach is polar opposite to the dirty high yield airburst nukes of the 1950s to 1980s.
Anonymous No.41455521 [Report]
>>41454577 (OP)
Don't use chatgpt to post, retard