>>3075814
Wouldn't getting banged by someone with a smaller dick add to the emasculation for you anyway? Not that the emasculation matters anyway. For me, it's the subversion element. You have two guys, one of them is shorter, weaker, more demure, more slender, and has a smaller dick, the other guy is the opposite. Everything about this says it should go in one direction, and that's been done to death, it's boring. On rare occasions we'll get your scenario, or maybe the small top won't have a bigger dick but he will be super dominant and the bigger guy will be the femmy sub. Improvement, but most of the time those sorts of stories just feels like a cop-out, like "oh yeah the smaller guy is pitching, BUT IT'S OKAY BECAUSE BIG PECKER". Call me greedy but I want the total subversion with no concessions at all.
And that's because in my head the real appeal is about desire. The big strong confident hung alpha male doesn't care about conventional roles, or "how it SHOULD be", or any of that. In that scenario, he gets the short shy girly pinkydick, and if he bottoms for that guy, it's because he WANTS that, he NEEDS it, and he'll have it because he CAN. And I also think the idea of the small-framed small-dicked femboy secretly wanting to top but being too shy and self-conscious to ask for all the same reasons he'd normally be expected to bottom, is just irresistible.
