Thread 279915572

Is Madoka the only good yuri anime?

>>279915572 (OP)
>>>/wsr/

>>279915572 (OP)
Yes

>>279915572 (OP)
One of the best.

whoever you’re baiting is definitely justified

Prisma > Madoka

>>279915572 (OP)
Will they kiss in the Movie?

>>279916871
where's the gif without this crop

>>279916770
Who is prisma?

>>279915572 (OP)
>Yuri
They are just good friends

Read to be actually sure.

Be sure to read.

Every bump is OP samefagging.

>>279918366
Prisma deez nuts!

geg the yuri 'cow is getting desperate after losing the narrative so hard

>>279923770
He thinks by making bait posts he will change anything about the fact that there's 0 yuri in Madoka and that every unbiased person can see and knows that.
Sad state of affairs indeed

Someone said cow? i want to milk a cow

after the cow has been milked i get my tasty milk.

Yuri café is good

loli yuri =/= yuri
No child with an underdeveloped brain is capable of true love

>>279915572 (OP)
>The only good yuri anime is straight
Yuribros... not like this...

>>279915572 (OP)
yes because this is a yuri with plot, most yuri are just focused in shitty drama and romance

samefag

Sad thing that the magia record thread is going to die, why /a/ doesn't like magia record.

>>279924118
erhm

>>279924974
the schizo is gonna post the same screenshot he always posts about homura saying it's a love no one can understand to explain why it's not gay

>>279924974
I like Homura's smile.

>>279924974
>>279925394
>Admits he already knows the truth
>Posts misinformation anyway
k
https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Nitro+_Q&A_Panels_at_Animagic_2013
https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Puella_Magi_Madoka_Magica_the_Movie:_Rebellion_Official_Guidebook_%22Only_You%22
The more you picture the people who are better at debating than you as schizos, the more you admit that you're even more retarded than a schizo (otherwise you wouldn't lose to schizos over and over again).

I'm not schizo, i just think "people" agreeing on something is the same person.

>>279915572 (OP)
it's the only mahou shojo anime

AKEMI SEX
SEX WITH AKEMI

>>279926249
I want to bully her about her small chest and for her to bully me for liking it.

>>279925916
>Q: Is Homura in love with Madoka?
>A: Probably

seems like it answered the question pretty thoroughly

>>279915572 (OP)
No, a good yuri anime is upfront about being a yuri anime. AI YO and holding hands is pretty weaksauce.

>>279926381
she'd bully you about your small dick first

>>279926732
Chances are that you will not get replies now because the antiyuri group are homos that sleep at the same time in the same bed. Patience.

>>279927720
>https://desuarchive.org/a/search/image/vUlkUVab0UZD8sdF_4Lhfw/

weird that they all use the exact image with the exact same filename as well

how is this boring shlop STILL going

>>279927269
Hot.

>>279927720
>Unironic gay fantasy
Weirdo.

>>279926732
If Urobuchi was really against people interpreting his characters as gay, he would have said no, plain and simple, instead of probably. The next answer is him doing damage control because the interviewer kept pushing for the topic to continue instead of accepting the answer. Unlike other interviews, this one doesn't have a Japanese script so we don't know what he said in Japanese, so whatever lovelike is likely lost in translation, same for the pronouns used (is "in their case" or "in her case"?)

>>279930043
It's not an interview. It's a series of Q&A questions, being translated from people asking questions in German into Japanese (and then both into English). We have audio from the second day of that event, but not for that question which was on the first day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ1jJuod060

>interviewer kept pushing for the topic
Multiple people are asking questions, not a single person. It's not even clear that they are being asked in that order. But I don't think that he is talking about Homura in the second question, but homosexuals in general. Notice how he uses a "their" to refer to homosexuals in general instead of "her" if he was talking about Homura.

>>279930362
>>279930043
There's also the interview in which we do have the original Japanese text with that clearly states his views more clearly:

>https://wiki.puella-magi.net/Shinjidai_no_Mixture_Magazine_BLACK_PAST
>まどかとほむらの間には狭義のセックスは成立しないし子どもも生まれない (Interviewer Context)
>僕の場合、男と女の間に成立するような関係は、同姓同士でも成り立つものだろうと考えている部分があるのかもしれません。
>ックスという要素は加わるものの、男女間の関係が人間関係の中でそれほど特殊なものとは思えないんですよ。

Here we can see that what when he brings up the "sexual attraction" part from that German Q&A, he's probably more talking about the physical act of baby-making sex rather than sexual attraction as a whole. We know because he's written other yuri couples who are shown enjoying each other's company in bed in other works.

Homu

>>279915572 (OP)
I wouldn't call it a yuri anime. There is quite literally one singular yuri scene in the entire show, and even that i think was supposed to be taken metaphorically.

>>279924974
duckmura

where are the yuri haters?

>>279931913
Futa is gross.

>>279931922
Yes. Yes it is. I have that tag blacklisted. I don't like seeing dicks that aren't mine.

>>279915572 (OP)
>yuri
hehe

Why can't people here differentiate between love and the desire to fingerblast someone to orgasm, Jesus Christ

>>279932186
The G stands for gooner

>>279932186
They should probably stop making spin-offs where they tease Homura wanting to fingerblast Madoka then.

>>279932186
Yurifags are absolutely terrified of the idea of having to pin the definition of yuri down to actual gay intimacy. They would instantly lose all of their “territory” everywhere

>>279915572 (OP)
It's the only good anime

>>279932509
How about wanting to get married? Is that enough gay intimacy for you?

ほら見てまどかと私のためのウエディングケーキよ

>>279932533
Irrefutable

Keeping your bait thread bumped for 13 hours = obsessed

>>279926732
When he explained what he meant by that right afterwards yes, outright saying it’s not a homosexual love. But I shouldn’t expect a yurifag to be able to read when they are well renowned for their inability to do so.

>>279930043
>The next answer is him doing damage control because the interviewer kept pushing for the topic to continue instead of accepting the answer
No, it was him explaining that he didn’t mean it that way.

>>279932748
He didn't though:

>A: I don't think it is that special - a really strong friendship turns into a lovelike-relationship without the sexual attraction, in their case
>their

He's not taking about Homura, hence why he doesn't use she.

>>279930362
>I don't think that he is talking about Homura in the second question, but homosexuals in general. Notice how he uses a "their" to refer to homosexuals in general instead of "her" if he was talking about Homura
Yeah he just went completely off topic and mentioned specific stuff that only applies to Homura, to talk about homosexuals.
You are a complete fucking retard.

>>279932775
>hence why he doesn't use her
Quick correction to my post.

>>279930781
>Clearly states that girls being close is normal and not "gay" as "gay" doesn’t exist
He’s literally laughing at you.

>>279932800
>yeah he just went completely off topic
It's not one person. Multiple people are asking questions. Watch the Q&A I linked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ1jJuod060

>>279931652
Hi op.
There was zero.

>>279932816
Why don't you quote the exact text where he says that? Because he's not saying that all.

>>279932465
>>279932559
Obvious gag scenes.
If you want a serious and consistent portrayal of marriage in Madoka, read Tomoe Mami’s Mundane Everyday Life.

>>279932775
> a really strong friendship turns into a lovelike-relationship without the sexual attraction
He is clearly talking about Homura.
There is either a mistranslation or referring to Homura and Madoka.
Autist

>>279932852
The gag is Homura is gay for Madoka in that spin-off. The narration points out that she is being weird.

>>279932835
Yes he is.
He says the only difference between same sex and different sex relationships is everything sexual, which is true.
It’s a big difference but it’s the only one.

>>279932863
>there
You used the wrong version of their. It makes even less sense that he's taking about Madoka/Homura when the question was specifically about Homura.

>there is either a mistranslated
Correct, which is what was explained.

>>279932864
Making a gay joke doesn’t means she’s actually gay. Touch grass and talk to people.

>>279932885
>It makes even less sense that he's taking about Madoka/Homura when the question was specifically about Homura
You are clearly an autistic schizo to not realize he was talking about Homura’s relationship to Madoka, therefore the both of them were involved.
You’re claiming he made a specific statement about something that happened in the show but that he meant to talk about homosexuals. You are the reason why nobody takes yurifags seriously and you are essentially lolcows.

>>279932880
>can't quote the text because he doesn't know nip
"ックス" refers to the act of sex, not anything else.

>>279932898
You don't drool when making a gay joke. Even the text points out that's not normal.

>>279932925
>You’re claiming he made a specific statement about something that happened in the show but that he meant to talk about homosexual
He made a comment about Homura's feelings for Madoka and then was asked another question about why he makes works about homosexuals, which he has done. He never talked about Homura's/Madoka's relationship, just Homura's feelings for her so it doesn't make sense to talk about their relationship.

Symphogear is superior to Madoka at giving the yuri audience what they want.

>>279932965
Can you stop replying to bait threads? We're not trying to get into a shitposting war with Symphogear.

>>279932933
Playing with semantics means you know you’re wrong.
The drooling is a visual gag so yes it is indeed played out for laughs, it’s like nose bleeding.

>>279932962
You are completely fucking retarded. It’s obvious the question was a follow up on the previous one. Language barrier is the reason why the interviewers thought he was talking about romantic or sexual love. Which he then says he wasn’t.
Also funny how you ignored the rebellion link which proves you wrong as well.

>>279932965
Madoka isn’t trying to get yuricucks what they want.

>>279933010
He says while bumping the bait thread.

>>279933035
>playing with semantics means you know you’re wrong
>I said you were playing semantics -- that means you're wrong without proof
Never mind the fact that you are trying to argue the about the exact meaning of what he meant in the interview. It's only semantics when other people do it, clearly. The drooling again shows her attraction to Madoka in that spin-off.

>which he then says he wasn’t.
He doesn't say that at all. He said homosexuality doesn't involve physical sex, which is true. Nothing about it not being real (hence why his other works have had homosexual couples).

>>279933123
You’re wrong because of the context. He is specifically talking about the relationship between the girls in Madoka and their fan reception, and clearly saying that the reason the girls are so close to each other is because such relationships are possible between girls as long as there is no sexuality involved.
The drooling is a visual gag with no impact on the plot and no amount of coping will ever make it anything else.
>He said homosexuality doesn't involve physical sex
I was talking about the other interview the one about Homura.

Imagine spending 14 hours keeping a bait thread alive

>>279933202
That's the interviewer talking. And again you keep using "sexuality" when no such word in used in the interview.

>The drooling is a visual gag
And the gag is that Homura's affection for Madoka goes beyond what normal friends have. It's stated to be weird and abnormal by the text's own admission.

>>279933046
>Madoka isn’t trying to get yuricucks what they want.
Explain the KyoSaya shippers & why no one ships Sayaka with Kyosuke?

>>279916871
I hope Homura has made Madoka wear vibrio-panties in this scene,

just so you know Aoi Yuki is a huge yurifag. She's big Madoka x Homura & Hibiki x Miku shipper/

>>279916871
The expression that Madoka is making are giving me “Homura has made me wear vibrating panties for this dance sequence” vibes.

>>279933269
Urobuchi isn’t trying replying to the interviewer, retard. The interviewer asked him about the relationships of Madoka characters, and he replied on this topic, saying just because they’re close doesn’t means they’re sexually attracted to each other.
>The gag is
A gag.

>>279933279
The staff isn’t responsible for western trannies’ retardation.

>>279933308
She’s married to a man.

Posting images with a reddit filename = tourist

>>279933259

It’s not bait. It’s simple reasoning.

It’s like this:

You take the blue pill, the dream ends. You wake up in yuribait and believe whatever you want to. You take the red pill, you stay in Shoujo Ai and I show you how deep the doomed Yuri goes.

>>279933380
Madoka has neither of these two things.
But of course a ritualposting shitskin foid doesn’t have the brain capacity to understand that.
Madoka is aimed at human men, not female baboons, so you have no say on the matter.

>>279933342
A gag where a girl drools over another girl is a yuri gag because it shows (abnormal) sexual attraction.

>the interviewer asked him about the relationships of Madoka characters,
>まどかがキュゥべえに願いを伝える段階では、彼女にとってのほむらは何を言っているのかよくわからない電波女なわけですよ(笑)
He doesn't say that at all. He specifically mentions how Madoka thought Homura was a weirdo in the final timeline.

>>279933465
A gag is just a gag, you’re grasping at straws to be using that as an argument lol.
And we’re clearly not talking about the same thing, what you posted is completely unrelated. He says she’s dumb because she told Kyubey about Madoka.

>>279933342
> Urobuchi isn’t trying replying to the interviewer
I meant he is replying. No idea why my corrector fucked it like that.

Bumping another man’s bait thread is cuckoldry. No different from raising another man’s retarded mutt son.

>>279933342
>Western Trannies
>Ume Aoki

>>279933522
Gags show traits of the characters. If a girl was constantly drooling over a hot guy, she would be obviously straight. So when you constantly show Homura drooling over Madoka, getting nosebleeds at the idea of sleeping with her, and trying to even kiss her, it's because she's sexually attracted to Madoka in that work.

>he says she’s dumb because she told Kyubey about Madoka.
Not even google translate would give you that from the line I posted.

>>279933589
This isn’t shipping.

>>279933638
Gags show something that is funny.
A couple times isn’t "constantly"
You have nothing.
> Not even google translate would give you that from the line I posted.
What are you saying it’s saying then? Please explain how it’s even close to being on topic when he’s clearly talking about how she told everything to Kyubey. Yuritards continue to be complete lolcows that are incapable of making a point and spam random shit, mental gymnastics and bait to cope.

>>279933645
Retard-kun.....

>>279933713
Says the guy who is so socially disabled he doesn’t understand basic interactions and thinks everything everyone says between friends is 100% serious.

I jerk off to other people having sex…

>>279915572 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt6WGWS0brg

>>279933748
They’re straight too btw just like the megucas.
Funny how yuri is so niche all you can do is latch onto already popular stuff.

>>279933674
>a couple times isn’t "constantly"
This is just moving the goalposts. Works like 魔法少女部まどかマギカ have these kinds of jokes every chapter. What's funny in that scene is Homura being a homo, which is why even some straight series have a token yui gag character like Kuroko Shirai from Index. Her over affection is the joke, but she's still attracted to Misaka.

>please explain how it’s even close to being on topic when he’s clearly talking about how she told everything to Kyubey
You don't know Japanese and can't even read the translation provided:
>At the stage when Madoka spoke out her wish to Kyubei, for her [Madoka], Homura is a denpa (wacko) whose words she could not understand
It clearly states when Madoka made her wish, she thought Homura was a crazy woman. She only changed her opinion after seeing all the timelines.

>>279933787
The point of a gag is to be funny not to make a statement about a character. Especially when it has no impact on the overreaching plot.
And yeah, I misread your quote because of how off topic it was.
Still completely unrelated to the point.

>>279915572 (OP)
No, because it and Nanoha and the Sailor Moon manga before it completely ruined the Mahou Shoujo genre by infesting it with yuritroons.

>>279935370
>page 10 bump
Thanks for confirming you were always a falseflag.

>>279935746
>always
Meds schizo, you’ve got me confused with someone else.

>>279933767
''I love you, Alice''
>Touches her boob.
>About to kiss.
Shit yuribait.

>>279935794
No, I’m talking about you, the retard who spams the same narrative about the sailor moon manga or whatever everywhere.
I correctly identified you as a false flagger last time and you just proved right, which I always am, yet again.

>>279935835
>meanwhile Lain dates and kisses with a boy and Alice had a crush on a male teacher
The point of Lain is that she loves everyone due to being born from the collective unconscious. That doesn’t means she’s gay for them. It’s obviously a different form of love.

>>279935854
Pretty sure it’s just Kyokonigger

>>279935370
I believe Nanoha brought more yuritroons.

>>279935370
>>279936074
>watches yuri
>cries about yuri
The eternal /pol/tard

For me, HomuSaya

>>279936098
I’m not a /pol/fag, just a fujo who hates that yuritroons invaded and ruined my genre.

>>279936032
That’s just a yuritroon boogeyman like majimafag, anyone who calls out yuritards gets called that.
And that guy is a yuritard false flagging.

>>279936123
If that were true you would stop lumping Madoka with your narrative when you’ve already been proven it’s not yuri in the slightest.

Yuri end soon

Reminder that Madoka is already confirmed to not be yuri. It’s not even "up to interpretation" or whatever nonsense, the team straight up didn’t have yuri on their mind when they wrote at all. Yuritards are in for a rude awakening when Kaiten completely destroys their narrative (unless they just pretend it doesn’t exist like they already do so many things).

>>279936179
Kyoukonigger is a yuritard falseflagging as antiyurifag, that's why telling any guy against yuri "kyokonigger" is fitting and insulting.

>>279936179
>If that were true you would stop lumping Madoka with your narrative when you’ve already been proven it’s not yuri in the slightest.
Why does Madoka have practically zero male characters then?

>>279936265
I have never seen a non-yuritard use that name. It’s always the yuritards using it on the people who call them out. I have no idea if that’s even a real person, nor do I care, but if he pisses off yuritards so much he’s probably based.

>>279936285
>Why does a magical girl franchise focus on magical girls?
I sure fucking wonder anon
My turn now
If it’s yuri then why is there zero romance between the girls??? Why are all instances of romance in the series purely straight?? Not only is there no yuri romance, the author went as far as giving you a straight romance subplot as the ONLY instance of it in the series. Do you understand why calling that yuri puts you are a retarded yurifag trying to force that shit everywhere? Nevermind the fact that you’re still bumping this blatant bait thread that you saved on page 10.

>>279936250
>didn't have yuri on their mind when they hired an extremely prevalent yuri artist

>>279936338
>puts
proves

>>279936347
They said their reasoning for hiring her was her popularity among the general anime crowd. That’s literally it. No mention of yuri whatsoever.
You know Ume did a lot of straight stuff too right? She’s a popular anime artist. That’s it.

>>279936299
A yuritard is not based and if you use the same specific arguments or ideas than him then you must know you resemble a known 2024 yuritard.

>>279936338
>Why does a magical girl franchise focus on magical girls?
Except back before the genre started to pander to yuritroons Mahou Shoujo was full of male characters and the girls were even allowed to have male love interests like in Cardcaptor Sakura.

>>279936395
I use my own arguments and it doesn’t matter if other people do too, when something is true many different people are gonna be aware of it, that’s normal.

I only watched the original tv series. Noped the fuck out after seeing trailers for the newer stuff. I'm glad my experience is not tarnished.

>>279936422
Madoka girls also show interest in men even if only Sayaka has a specific love interest.
Madoka is a 12 episode series so of course it wasn’t gonna waste time with a gorillion side plots and minor characters.

>>279936464
The Expanded Universe and side stuff also never features any male characters…

>>279936500
It features the same ones as the series.
And again, the point is magical girls. Not romance. So obviously it focuses on magical girls not their love interests.
It’s no different from the all girls series like GuP or Touhou which aren’t yuri in the slightest either.

>>279936441
You use the same specific arguments as a fake 2024 antiyurifag, what could mean you are one too. Different people can refute something in different ways.

>>279936940
That’s what happens when you don’t refute an argument. It spreads. You only have yourself to blame.

>>279937662
Blame myself for no behaving like a yurifag pretending to be antiyurifag? It could not be me. You are the guy that seems a spinoff of an 2024 fake antiyurifag.

>>279938441
>incoherent post
Average yuritroon

>>279936250
>It’s not even "up to interpretation" or whatever nonsense,
Even shinbo says "i think" when he talks about Homura's love. Nobody denies said that yuri interpretations are 100% wrong.
Some member outside of the MQ has said she saw a yuri-like scene in rebellion and i don't see anyone of the main staff scolding her.

>>279939679
Urobuchi said it wasn’t romantic.
Just because they don’t harass the people who headcanon yuri shit in the franchise doesn’t means they don’t think it’s 100% fanon with no canon basis whatsoever.

>>279939863
Doesn't means they don't think yuri is fanon with some canon basis either. Unlike you i can't read their minds. You should not post false narratives.

>>279933356
So? Some female yuri mangaka are married to men. We're not talking about Aoi Yuuki being a lesbian, but about her shipping homosexual characters
She's not married anyway, she's too much of a femcel

>>279936285
literal waifufag trope
the only yurifags this appeals to are english speaking self hating alphabet people

>>279940003
If there was any canon basis to it they would have said so and wouldn’t have outright deconfirmed it.

>>279940101
She doesn’t see any Madoka character as homosexual either. Clearly she knows women belong with men.

>>279940646
>and wouldn’t have outright deconfirmed it.
Where do they outright deconfirm yuri "interpretations" of the fans?

>>279941282
When they say the characters aren’t romantically interested in each other, and present Sayaka’s attraction to Kyosuke as the only instance of romance involving the PMHQ in the franchise.

>is homura in love with madoka
>probably
>in love
Urobuchi confirmed to be a retard who doesn't know what "in love" means since his characters are supposed to be heterosexual. Apparently the retard thinks being in love means loving someone as a friend with no romantic or sexual feelings involved.

>>279942311
>author said something so it's true
no

>>279942306
Yeah, that's canon. I was not against that. I was talking about interpretations of fans.
You said:
>It’s not even "up to interpretation" or whatever nonsense,
And when urobuchi or the director are asked about the topic they answer: Probably... i think...
That denies your claim.
What is your problem?
>She doesn’t see any Madoka character as homosexual either. Clearly she knows women belong with men.
Yeah, that's why she created Natsume, the girl who acts weird when she is around Sae.

The moment the author says "probably" instead of "no" becomes open to interpretation. Anything else is just cope by the schizo

>>279942311
There was a language barrier, the interviewer was speaking German.

>>279942492
When you’re trying to argue that your headcanon is actually "secret canon" that was put there intentionally, it kind of requires the author to share it. Otherwise it’s just your headcanon.

>>279942717
Urobuchi didn’t say probably or I think.
And only westerners think a girl "acting weird" with other girls means she’s not attracted to men.

>>279942793
…except if he also says in another interview that it’s not romantic love and that romantic love would only put you on the level of Sayaka.

>>279942921
>There was a language barrier, the interviewer was speaking German.
So Urobuchi knows German? If he knows German, he must have understood what the interviewer meant. If he doesn't, then the entire question was lost to him, which can't be the case given the follow up question and his longer answer to it.

>>279943053
This is the most retarded thing I ever read
Are you 12?

>>279943213
Says the retard who talks about a language barrier. How can Urobuchi answer questions in a language he doesn't understand? Under that logic he also misunderstood the question about homosexual love then.

>>279942921
>Urobuchi didn’t say probably or I think.
Do you even read the sources of your claim? Urobuchi said probably. And shinbo state his claims more like opinions. There might be mistranslations but that's what we have so far.
>And only westerners think a girl "acting weird" with other girls means she’s not attracted to men.
Yeah because you are japanese, you must be 100% sure about that...
I will not waste more time trying to reason with a shitposter.
Autism must be a real problem, i see. Why don't you do something about it?

>>279943303
What happened is obviously that he misunderstood what they meant by in love, and only figured it out when they mentioned homosexuality. "In love" is an old term that doesn’t literally translate in most languages. "Homosexuality" is a recent word, pretty much all languages say it the same way.

>>279943379
>Urobuchi said probably
In a completely different interview. In the rebellion one he gives no sign of it being just his opinion at all.
>Autism must be a real problem, i see. Why don't you do something about it?
I don’t know your address so I can’t, but feel free to put yourself out of misery.

I just love the silly 'gukas bros

>>279943627
>I don’t know your address so I can’t, but feel free to put yourself out of misery.
You autism and lack of self-awareness is so big that you don't even realize most people can see you use dishonest discussion tactics. It's not worth having a discussion with you.
You normalize faggotry by saying girls acting "weird" is not bad and to top it all off you show big autism every reply. Lmao.
>i will reply every anon that is wrong on madok/a/
Lmao, can imagine the lack of self-awarenes and mental illness. Truly your dog must feel pity for you and more human than you.

Canon

I trooned out so my canonically straight waifu would love me back. Who am I?

True, my owner comes every day to madoka to btfo yurifags and he says he is chad for doing this on daily basis. Please someone put down my poor owner. His autism is off charts.

>>279943943
sayaki is obviously hetero

>>279943939
>most people can see you use dishonest discussion tactics
Yeah bro like uh
Actually backing up my claims
Actually refuting opposing claims
Not spamming the same already refuted shit over and over
Not making un-backed up claims
Not shitting up every thread on purpose or making/bumping bait threads like this one
So dishonest!

>>279944170
>Being terminally online is only ok when we do it!!!

>>279944349
They all are. He knows that which is why he will not reply to you.

>>279944349
She fell in love with Kyouko after seeing all the timelines and Kyouko dying for her. Sayaka is bisexual

>>279944385
homu is gay for madoka tho

>>279944441
>>279944444
Both of these claims were already refuted here >>279925916 so i'm not sure what you're trying to do by making them again.

>>279944568
>doesn't post any explanation just random links and an irrelevant picture
oh you're just a schizoneet

Madoka creating a cure for autism and saving madoka threads from the schizo.
Sadly she still could not find a cure for his homosexuality.
>>279944385
>>Being terminally online is only ok when we do it!!!
Are you blind? the image talks about someone so autistic that thinks replying to every wrong thing on internet is important. Actually is not even to everyone who is wrong, that is only one of our schizos can achieve.
I know i'm shitposter, the other guy believes he is not one and all he does is dishonest discussions.

>>279944620
>Official interviews
>Random links
You are coping and seething lol. What a lolcow.

>>279944663
Literally all your posts in these threads are meta shit. You are the schizo.

>>279944684
>the author determines the "correct" interpretation
no

>For example, it would’ve felt wrong if Sayaka had moved on to a completely new love interest. That wouldn’t have worked (laughs). I knew it wasn’t a series where we could make such bold changes.
>Shinbo: But that kind of story for Sayaka is interesting (laughs).
>Urobuchi: A new love, only to turn into a witch again? (laughs).
>Shinbo: Right, she’d end up repeating the same thing over and over.
>Urobuchi: She’d fall in love every time a handsome guy appeared, and then turn into a witch…
>Iwakami: Like "Tora-san," constantly meeting new people and getting heartbroken (laughs).
I like how they don't even mention the idea of giving her a female love interest. That wasn't even on their mind.

>>279944797
See >>279942921 , second reply.
If you admit that it's just your headcanon that wasn't intended by the staff, then say that, stop trying to pretend it's "subtext" or anything other than your mentally ill headcanon.

>>279944889
anything outside of a given show doesn't determine what's canon for any show. it's like I'm speaking to a toddler.

>>279944965
So Rebellion isn't canon?
Also they're literally talking about the intent they had when they made the show. If you want to claim something is implied, it has to be intended by the author, otherwise, again, it's just something you made up.

>>279945053
>misses the point entirely
>author's intent matters
oof

>>279945095
For the fourth time, yes. Author's intent matters when you try to claim something was put there as intentional subtext. It can't be implied if even the author doesn't see it.

Also, aren't you a nanohafag? Do you also think the word of god quotes confirming the yuri in Nanoha don't count either?

>Interview quotes don't count
Uh oh nobody tell the gwitchfags...

>>279945211
>implying I said it was intentional subtext
oof. by your logic the author can just make all the characters pansexual trannies after the fact and it's "canon".

>>279945296
>>implying I said it was intentional subtext
You did when you said they were gay canonically.
>by your logic the author can just make all the characters pansexual trannies after the fact and it's "canon"
That would contradict already established stuff, so no. Here, we're talking about the mindset they had WHEN they made the work.

>>279940271
>literal waifufag trope
>the only yurifags this appeals to are english speaking self hating alphabet people
Anon… Most yuritroons ARE waifufags, just a more extreme AGP purityfag version.

>>279945361
>I said canon = intentional therefore you think it too
oof
>it's contradictory because I said so
oof

>>279945477
In order for something to be implied, it has to be intentional.
What is the difference between what you're doing and just claiming your headcanon is canon? I could say that all megucas are canonically national socialists and it'd be a claim just as valid as yours.
And yes, retroactive statements are not the same as statements on the fly at all, especially when they change already established stuff.

>oof
tourist

>>279945649
>the author decides the canon, he just does okay?
>"well what if your interpretation was this strawman?"
>still no argument how it'd be contradictory
lole

>>279945723
>I'M A PERMAVIRGIN NEET WHO STARTED BROWSING IN 2006 PLEASE RESPECT ME
lol

>>279945867
The author decides what he puts in his work as subtext.
"Subtext" that isn't intentional is just headcanon.
According to your logic any headcanon is canon, so my headcanon that all the girls are fascists is canon too.
It'd be contradictory because they've been established as straight.

>>279945916
...are you innit?

>>279945997
>what's shown directly on screen is subtext
>they're straight because they just are
oof

>>279946043
What's shown directly on screen is them being straight.
They're straight because it was established.

>yuritard is a jartycuck
GEEEEG

>>279946074
>What's shown directly on screen is them being straight.
where lol

>>279946166
Everywhere

>>279946125
who is he talking to?

>yuritard admits to being a newfag
>other yuritards don't call him out because all yuritards are newfags
sad state of affairs

Haruhi is more popular than Death Note imo

>>279915572 (OP)
Is it still yuri if it’s only one character’s one sided love?

>>279946441
Madoka isn't even that lol

i'm b&?

>>279934461
>the point of a gag is to be funny not to make a statement about a character
Gags works only because they is consistent with their characterization in that work. Homura's wanting to get married to Madoka also did impact the overreaching plot of 魔法少女部まどかマギカ, because it leads to her usurping Madoka/Kyubey.

I'm still alive, i thought i was dead.

>>279946292
All "oldfags" apparently abandoned before 2023 and 2024 because when they are asked about those times they answer wrong. You abandoned madok/a/ threads and left newfags free for months. Your fault for not protecting this place.

>>279947745
>Gags works only because they is consistent with their characterization in that work
What?
That's not true at all. A lot of gags have the characters be out of character for comedy effect.

When i came these threads were confy and with very few drama and was like that for months. I had no idea they had owner and a culture.
Either way i follow the culture from late 2023 madoka threads, not your old culture.

>>279948282
The schizo obsessed with yuri and trannies ruined everything. Threads will only improve after kaiten is out since his antiyuri rants will be drowned in the middle of all the movie discussions

>>279948169
>a lot of gags have the characters be out of character for comedy effect.
>"lol so random" are now the height of gags
It's also not out of characters when they act in the same way across multiple events. If a girl freaks out at the sight of a spider multiple times, we can tell that she doesn't like spiders. If Homura shows sexual/romantic attraction to Madoka across multiple gags, that's part of her characterization for the work.

>>279948359
I'm not against that tho. I'm against a lot of their narratives they say because are filled with lies. Like: "look he is newfag". I wonder where were the antinewfag police when i arrived here with worse knowledge and even worse english.
"2025 oldfag logic":
>left for months, maybe even years
>what? why new posters are not like us and don't call out others like "we" did in the old times?
Are they retarded or are they larping as oldfags?

Never ask a "2025 oldfag" how many months he has stopped coming here.

>>279945916
>normalfag having a meltdown

I'm the thread police so these are my rules:
>you don't agree with me? you are a yurit...
>you don't use my lingo? you are a yurit...
>you are not oldfag? you are a yurit...
>you reply to something i don't like? you are a yurit...
>you don't like kyouko? your are yurit...
>you call me schizo or autist? that's absolutely wrong! and you are a yurit...

>>279948359
Debates have always existed in these threads, the only thing that's new is retards thinking everyone who disagrees with them is one person and only using the threads to fish for replies.

>>279948428
Except it's not that consistent in that manga and has no plot significance, it only lasts one panel.

>>279949869
All of these groups consistently out themselves as part of that group though. The thread police is right.

>>279950457
But these aren't debates, it's just people fighting over the same topic and repeating the same argumentd over and over and schizos baiting the antiyuri schizo to get (you)s and have a laugh at the expense of the threads

>>279950950
That's exactly what i said.
>the only thing that's new is retards thinking everyone who disagrees with them is one person and only using the threads to fish for replies

>>279950577
>All of these groups consistently out themselves as part of that group though.
>implying
Are not you the joke?
the thread police believe other out themselves for schizo reasons. You proved the joke right with your post.

>>279950457
Most antiyurischizos in these threads stay awake around CET time. So with that alone you can bet they are 3 at best(i have never seen the 3 at the same time tho).
Anyone calling them out has like 33% of being right in his\her guess, its very high.

>>279950529
>except it's not that consistent in that manga
It's consistent in multiple spin-offs. Just in Tamura: you had Homu drooling (>>279932465), Homu trying to kiss Madoka when time was stopped (>>279933638), and nosebleeding over the idea over sleeping with Madoka (pic related). This happens across multiple chapters and multiple volumes. It's even more consistent in the other one, where it's a driving force of the plot.

antiyurischizos are a very small group, and let's not talk about the arguing style and the "almost no image" style.
You trying to sell the group like something bigger is very pathetic. Am i supposed to see a pathetic show in silence?

>>279953606
And what about the groups that never posts anything on topic and only posts meta shit? What do you think of it?

>>279953566
3 instances with no impact on the plot isn't a consistency
The other one was also not serious when discussing marriage and basically the only thing they cared about was the cake.

>>279953702
>And what about the groups that never posts anything on topic and only posts meta shit? What do you think of it?
I suppose they are newfags or old poster returning to the threads(very unlikely) because these threads were even more meta shit the past year. They talk like threads being like this is something new.

>>279915572 (OP)
madoka is the only good anime

>>279953702
Fixed, forget the last post.
I suppose the guys who call out "metashit" like you are newfags or old poster returning to the threads(very unlikely) because these threads were even more meta shit the past year. They talk like threads being like this is something new.

>>279953750
>3 instances with no impact on the plot isn't a consistency
There is not plot to the Tamura manga. Every chapter focuses on a different timeline. And her behaviour is consistent across the timelines.

>the only thing they cared about was the cake
I like how you read the first chapter and haven't even looked at the raws.

It's just more and more excuses.

>>279954120
Doesn't change the fact that ACK-tier schizos who only come here to talk about other posters shouldn't be here.

>>279954256
>There is not plot to the Tamura manga
Correct, because it's a series of gags.
>I like how you read the first chapter and haven't even looked at the raws
It's not taken seriously during the whole thing. Which is why you're the only person in the universe trying to use that manga to support a yuri narrative.
Marriage is presented more seriously in the Mami manga.

Are there other instances of straight characters who are constantly the target of jokes that treat them as homosexuals in several official spin offs? Seems weird that a straight character gets so many gags about being a homo

>>279954430
The gag is she's gay for Madoka in them. That's her characterization.

>you're the only person in the universe
>ACK-tier schizos who only come here to talk about other posters shouldn't be here
Funny. You just broke your own rule.

madoka has a boyfriend
yuri is a disease.

>>279954674
It's a common trope in non-serious spinoffs
GuP is full of that too

>>279954698
A gag has no plot implications unless it's referenced by the plot and treated seriously later.
And retard, the fact that even yurifags don't take this as a proof that there's serious yuri in this franchise except for you is proof enough. Seriously, find me one japanese user who says that.

>>279954361
Are you for real?
These kind of posters are an exception. You(talking about anyone) can't have the moral highground and behave like a mindless animal at the same time. That is a sign of madness.

>>279954821
>GuP is full of that too
Not really.

>unless it's referenced by the plot and treated seriously later.
The marriage is brought up again and is the motivation for Homura's overthrowing Kyubey. Sayaka even tells her to stop. Why would she do that if it was just wasn't serious and just a joke?

>find me one japanese user who says that.
>https://x.com/0khfl0WfiNzxr2L/status/1143489044753477632

>>279954821
>the fact that even yurifags don't take this as a proof that there's serious yuri in this franchise except for you is proof enough.
I'm not a yurifag but i have said, that shit looks yuri(according to my definition of yuri) as fuck so he is not the only one
>inb4 you magically become a yurifag if you see any kind of yuri

It's also not true that all Japanese fans see Madoka characters as heterosexual.
https://x.com/2g_Shinri/status/1612460608619970564?t=hGzFi_MqrAhiGb_2CS4pBA&s=19
>Where does this kind of claim even come from, that "Gundam fans are used to tragedy, but yuri fans aren’t, so the emotional damage is worse"? Just look at the three major lesbians of Heisei-era anime (Akemi Homura, Himemiya Chikane, and Fujino Shizuru), they casually kill people or destroy the world.
>i-it doesn't count

>>279955496
Anon, he's retarded. The majority of fanworks are yuri for a reason.

>It's also not true that ALL Japanese fans see Madoka characters as heterosexual.
That was obvious since day one, it was the one of the weakest narrative they have been pushing and for months.
>>279955623
It's likely he will use his mind reading skill again and tell you how the creators of yuri fanworks are not serious.

https://x.com/xx3ioc/status/1876099633950380312?t=pFLFWx5-atNUxqsD-bYa0Q&s=19
>I love Kyouko, but Homura being a lesbian maniac is just the best too.

>>279955709
The schizo thinks in black and white. For him, not a single Japanese fan is a tumblrina tranny who sees the characters as lesbians. All of them know and understand that the characters are straight and that's why they love Mami's daily life. Though I bet he will change his narrative to "most of them know the characters are heterosexual" instead of all now.

>>279955185
>Not really.
Yes really. GuP has a lot of yuri jokes in side content.
>The marriage is brought up again
Comically, yes. It's not an actual official ceremony otherwise they wouldn't be able to get married at 14.
>https://x.com/0khfl0WfiNzxr2L/status/1143489044753477632
He's not saying this is serious proof of yuri in the franchise.

>>279955251
>I'm not a yurifag
Yet you keep bumping this thread. Curious.

>>279955496
>>279955710
You will find individual retards anywhere, but in the west it's a widespread opinion.

>>279955623
Unlike westerners, japs can make fanworks without thinking their fanwork is canon.

>The majority of fanworks are yuri
That's not even true. Most of it is solo character pictures or normal group pictures.

>>279955830
>Yes really. GuP has a lot of yuri jokes in side content.
Let's se them, because they are probably nowhere near as close.

>actual official ceremony otherwise they wouldn't be able to get married at 14.
That doesn't mean Homura's feelings aren't serious. Why would Sayaka be disgusted otherwise?

>He's not saying this is serious proof of yuri in the franchise.
>moving the goalposts
He's saying there's yuri scenes in the series.

>>279955830
>Yet you keep bumping this thread. Curious.
You are also are here bumping it. I have not bumped this thread from page 10 tho, if that's what you mean.

>>279955930
>Let's se them
Just use google. Some of them are actually explicit gay jokes that namedrop homosexuality and the likes
>That doesn't mean Homura's feelings aren't serious.
Faking a marriage at 14 and treating it like a real one kind of means you're not serious? If she was she would want to do it for real.
>He's saying there's yuri scenes in the series.
He's not even linking it back to the franchise like you're doing, just talking about that manga specifically and treating it like basically a fanwork.

>>279955979
I haven't bumped this thread a single time. Lurk more.

>>279956108
>Some of them are actually explicit gay jokes that namedrop homosexuality and the likes
>doesn't post any
Because they don't exist as you're decribing them.

>if she was she would want to do it for real.
And she did in her own eyes, which is why she considers Madoka and her now to be newly weds.

>he's not even linking it back to the franchise like you're doing
He specifically brings up Kirara Magica.

>>279956108
>I haven't bumped this thread a single time. Lurk more.
well then, genius, tell me why bumping this thread not from page 10 magically makes you suspect i could be a yurifag.

Here's what actually happens when a nip brings up yurishit in Madoka discussion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXRlggMPGLs&lc=UgyrmidcN5LQ1ucR9g14AaABAg
madomadomado-o7z's post: "Well, the pachinko presentation was pretty yuri-yuri as well..." (unprompted, what he's replying to didn't mention yuri)
18 likes
The comment above: 92 likes
The comment below: 54 likes

>>279956230
>Because they don't exist as you're decribing them
No, because i didn't read them myself, but they get brought up in /gup/ from time to time.
>And she did in her own eyes
No, she would want to do it officially. They could just wait 4 years and travel to some cucked country to get gay married.
>He specifically brings up Kirara Magica
And?

>>279956393
So you don't know the exact specifics. Your comparison was worthless.

>she would want to do it officially
>a character can only do things the way I say or else it doesn't count
Furthermore, it could happen in the future.

>And?
He's treating it as official content then, not fan content.

>>279956513
>So you don't know the exact specifics
I know it namedrops homosexuality which is already more than what you have.
>it could happen in the future
That's what i'm saying.
If she wanted to do a real one in the future, why do a fake one now? Nobody does that.
>He's treating it as official content
He's just mentioning where it's from, not trying to link it back to the series like you are.

>>279956310
18 likes is a lot. I thought they were less... japanese man...

>>279956309
It's a thread that calls Madoka yuri.
Bumping it means agreeing with it.

>>279956682
>Bumping it means agreeing with it.
My bumps were almost irrelevant if they never were in page 10. Other guys have been keeping this thread alive.

>>279956626
Just name dropping rezu isn't good enough when it depends on the context.

>why do a fake one now? Nobody does that
Because you say so? I can already prove that wrong because that's what girls in yuri manga do. They can't officially get married so they do their own thing.

>not trying to link it back to the series like you are.
Kirara Magica is an official publication. That's the whole point of bringing it up.

>>279956844
Doesn't change the fact that you endorsed this thread instead of posting on the other ones that died due to inactivity.

>>279956930
>isn't good enough
I agree, but it's still more than what you have.
>that's what girls in yuri manga do. They can't officially get married so they do their own thing
They can do it by traveling to western countries so clearly if they don't it's a choice of the author to have the situation not be so serious.
>Kirara Magica is an official publication. That's the whole point of bringing it up
Pretty sure the point was just to give the source.

>>279956941
which ones? It seems i lost some threads kek. The other one i saw was the magia record but i knew it was going to die either way.
>>279924808

>>279957059
This thread should have been a containment thread for yuritards, the fact that it's the only one where you significantly posted, to side with them to boot, is obviously suspicious.

>>279957034
>still more than what you have.
Showing sexual attraction to another girl is far more than a name drop.

>they can do it by traveling to western countries
>[if they don't do it like x, it doesn't count]
It's fiction, so it can abide by any rules, not just the one you make up to win an arguement. Sayaka despite being disgusted with her actions, never says they aren't married. So they obviously are.

>Pretty sure the point was just to give the source.
And the source is an officially published one.

>>279957147
>This thread should have been a containment thread for yuritards,
Well, would have not been better for you keeping all the yurifags and me here in this containment thread? while you enjoy the other madoka thread?
I have not seen the catalog in detail lately so maybe i skipped some madoka thread. Nothing makes you happy

>>279957298
>Showing sexual attraction to another girl is far more than a name drop
Not when it's not serious.
>>[if they don't do it like x, it doesn't count]
I mean yeah, if they don't try to get officially married, it's pretty fucking obvious to anyone with a brain that they don't want to.
All they care about is the cake.
>And the source is an officially published one
Doesn't means the user posted that to imply it has any kind of relevance to actual canon or the franchise.

>>279957310
I was in all theads.
But the purpose of a containment thread is that you keep the contained busy so they don't go and shit up other threads.

>>279957414
>not when it's not serious
>[if I keep repeating it, that means its true]
>if they don't try to get officially married...
>[if I keep repeating it, that means its true]
Why don't you show me a yuri manga where that's the case? It's not even true for Japan where all you have to do to get married is send a form into a government. You don't need an official ceremony at all.

>any kind of relevance to actual canon or the franchise.
Kirara Magica is part of the franchise.

>"why are not you shitposting in threads i like?"
>"why are you shitposting in threads don't like?"
He is getting mentally worse every day.

Speaking of how Japanese fans see Rebellion, here's the largest (and only currently running) yuri magazine talking about all the yuri they saw in Rebellion.

https://x.com/_owarikamo/status/1548352041562816512?t=UkaTO3dZf1-LqOmswZC9Rw&s=19
https://x.com/Mwf6S/status/1178649528175452160?t=0EbZN1sHoa9hIgxchwO6tg&s=19
https://x.com/Mo_00pp/status/1386261525283831809?t=vf8ypIQ0HrK8cJrpd5bHPQ&s=19
>Wait, does this mean we get to see what happens next to that lesbian known as Akemi Homura?!?!
>I watched the Madoka Magica movie, and I now fully understand that Homura is seriously a lesbian. Also, she’s cute.
>I’m watching Rebellion with a friend, and Akemi Homura is just so insanely gay that I keep going like ‘lesbian~ lesbian~ ;;’ over and over.

>https://news.nicovideo.jp/watch/nw59946
>「百合（同性、特に思春期の女性間の恋愛関係）的な要素」といった
Even news articles talk about it. Obviously these aren't proof that the series is yuri, only that there are plenty of Japanese fans who do see it that way. Not exactly an obscure opinion. Now let the thread rest.