>>282133282
>not a thing
Because you say so? If subtext is what the author intended, an the author intends to make a couple, but doesn't make it explicit, then it exists.
>f the nature of a relationship isn’t revealed then it’s an unresolved plot point.
>just like all reveals. you’re supposed to make it clear if you’re a good writer.
By that logic, all subtext is bad and you should never leave anything unsaid. All characters should explain their motivations. But whether it is not good writing or not doesn't change the underlying nature of what it is.
>>282133295
I was talking about before G-Witch.
