>>281586446
>strawmans again
It's not "because I say so", that's literally what happened in the manga. They started feeling horny, got interrupted, then both literally said "Man, I'm glad I don't feel horny towards you anymore and I'll never realize my romantic feelings for you lol".
>There are more relationship types than fuck buddies
No, really?
The "relationship" they have in the manga isn't romantic, though, and never will be. They got relegated to "haha fondling gag" and "haha quirky idol-work/actress work gag".
>that's irrelevant
No, it isn't. The lack of chapters just shows there's literally nothing there for them to build off of in the manga. It blew its load early with the fondling joke, then said "Yeah, this isn't going anywhere by the way. We will continue the no-romance status quo forever for these two characters."
Not my fault you dishonestly think I'm saying "If there's no on-screen sex nothing is happening", despite me saying otherwise literally seconds ago.
You don't get to try and call them a couple in the manga, then cope "well they don't have to actually be, that's still a relationship".
>To themselves and the twitter comics.
The twitter canon includes Sono Comiket releases, they are literally bundled together for that express purpose, retard.
>There's no psychic in the manga anon
Because the manga isn't canon. It's editor fanfiction for weird baby-diaper fetish play, not present in the source material, and changing character designs, personalities and story developments for no reason.
It's legit fascinating that you argue the source material is "not canon" compared to an adaptation. You would be laughed out of any serious discussion with this mindset.
>Because you say so
Nope, that's a strawman. It is legit what happened in the manga, straight up. They did the groping a few times, almost noticed their feelings for each other, then the interruption came and the manga said "no romantic development, ever" to maintain the status quo of that joke.