Thread 283109938

NIPPLES CONFIRMED

...censored.

>>283109938 (OP)
That's looks so bad. Why not just censor it completely at that point? Just don't show her tits at all.

>>283109938 (OP)
Told ya that the Blu Rays would remain censored

>>283109938 (OP)
Just imagine: There are people who actually pay for this kek

brb rewatching Seikon no Qwaser instead

>>283110196
Freaky blob

>>283110256
Their hopes and dreams... shattered.

>>283109938 (OP)
Cringe

>>283109938 (OP)
I don't see nothing
I see nothing
I don't see a thing

>>283109938 (OP)
>unspoilered by mod
lol

Mannequin nudity was a staple of anime in the 90s so watching people sperg out about it now is absurd to me. If you need nipples to enjoy something, take your shirt off while you watch it.

>>283111455
Various TV anime series in the 90s had nipples tho, the 1989-1992 Ranma anime had nipples, Tsushin Agedama had nipples, Blue Seed had nipples, Outlaw Star had nipples, Nightwalker had nipples, the third Mashin Hero Wataru had loli nipples

>>283111455
>If you need nipples...
tranny hands write this, lel

>>283111455
you are comparing old ass anime not drawing nipples out of laziness to actively censoring kek

>>283111515
>>283111568

>>283110196
>>283111607

>>283109938 (OP)
To be fair, Ranma is a man and it's well known anime men don't have nipples.

>>283111635
Looks retarded still, but hair/object censorship is at least less shit than Barbie Doll

>>283111568
Female Ranma sexo

imagine thinking this fertility goddess hugs are not liked lmao

>>283111448
MODS=GODS

>>283111515
90s Gundam series like Victory and Turn A Gundam also had nipples

>>283111515
>>283111880
Certainly, though Outlaw Star has nipple bumps, not colored nipples. (I was going to say they only did it once, but I double checked and Mel does get the same treatment in the next to last episode.) If Aisha didn't have such stonkin' great tits, then I could see people complaining just as loudly about that then as they do now.
My point is that mannequin nudity has been a thing for decades, so getting upset about it now is silly.
We did not watch any of those shows FOR the nipples. We watched them because they were fine television.

>>283111541
Your fallacy has one problem: I DO care. I care that the quality of the media should be judged on the actually important matters: story, characterization, music, etc. It should not be judged on whether or not it features nipples. Putting a focus on the latter takes away focus from the former.

>>283111914
Urt had visible areola

>>283111914
>>283111936

>>283111455
It's less offensive than censoring previously uncensored material in the manga and anime. At least this way everyone can see how absurd it is to omit or hide nipples.

>>283111620
Old anime could intentionally still have been censored based on factors, something like Srungle in 1983 seemed to have been told to stop including any in between episodes (left from an episode preview, right during the actual episode, additionally nipples were semi-routinely shown before this and completely stopped after this happened.)

Of course though plenty of 80s and 90s shows had nipples during daytime and evening time slots, but it isn't like standards and practices didn't exist either.

>>283111695
Hiding breasts should look retarded.

>>283112069
That's not in the show.
I still don't know where that shot is actually from.

>>283111455
Why would someone even lie about this bullshit? Nipples weren't uncommon in the 90s and earlier at all. Were you just praying that everyone in this thread is a zoomer that's never watched anything before the 2010s?

>>283109938 (OP)
>classic series famous for its nudity/sex comedy
>remake censors all sexual nudity; females look like dolls
i hate the modern zeitgeist so much, thank god shows like MahoAko exist.

I love Ranma, so I have fun watching this version. But I agree the original is better

>>283112489
What's the lie? The existence of counterexamples doesn't make the statement untrue.

>>283112408
Cut scene from episode 2.

>>283112769
Was it a DVD extra or something?

>>283110196
Better not to show it at all than show ... this.

>>283112834
What's wrong with it anon?

>>283111515
>>283111831
>>283111880

I'm less bothered by being deprived of nipples than I am about just how weird it looks if that makes sense.

>>283111455
Why would you even this dumbshit when Ranma showed nipples back then?

>>283112767
NTA but plenty of 90s anime had nipples (including Ranma)
>see above
Sailor Moon was a little Kid's show, but even if you include children's shows, Doraemon had nipples until 1999, pic related is from 1997 for example, same year as the final episode of Sailor Moon you posted

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283110196
Look like tranny tits

>>283112408
You may have watched it on toonami.

>>283112767
That's just what their bodies look like under the leotards when they transform. It actually is a transformation. Untransformed, Usagi's canon nipples are dark pink and cute.

>>283111515
Based

>>283113144
>>283113194
Go Nagai's Devil Lady had nipples as well, but in the anime they only show the main antagonists' nipples and she was a futa so you might argue that she doesn't count? regardless they sexualized her a lot

>>283113144
Such an elaborate way to establish lack of consent.

>>283113116
it looks stupid

>>283112767
this is a show for children

>>283113318
>she was a futa
How do you know that? Did they actually show it?

>>283113318
Angels are not futas. They are angels, not women with dicks or men with cunts.

>>283113322
At least it looking stupid makes a statement that we should just let them draw the nipples.

>>283111914
>Your fallacy has one problem: I DO care.

Lol you don't faggot. If you cared about something, then you would be demanding it be presented exactly as it was made by the author and not changed for whatever retarded reason and/or censored in any way or form.

Imagine unironically censoring the nudity out of what’s supposed to be a freaking ECCHI series, like what’s even the point now?

>>283112767
>Using Sailor fucking Moon to make a point
Why are you comparing the 90’s equivalent of Precure, a literal glorified toy commercial and baby show, to Ranma which was always a pervy ecchi series meant for older teen males? Two completely different target demographics.

>>283113346
She used her dick to fuck the MC, but I guess angels are hermaphrodites like that other anon said

>>283113403
It wasn't even ecchi. It was just made back when boobs were funny instead of something gaijin won't let you draw.

>>283113194
1979-1999 Doraemon was kino

>>283113189
Because my point is not dependent on the specific shows included one way or the other. It's a sweeping generalized statement about a state of affairs that has existed for as long as anyone here has been watching anime. Mannequin nudity has always been a thing.

>>283113221
I certainly did, and then I bought the DVDs and that scene wasn't on there, either. If it were then I'd have been fapping to that, instead of the screenshot I posted earlier (or the Mogudan doujin, which remains his greatest work).

>>283113322
That doesn't matter since other shows for children did show nipples. Age demographics don't matter much to this discussion because none of the content that is relevant is "for adults."

>>283113387
I believe what you're making there is called a straw man fallacy, but it could be another form of fallacy as well.

>>283113403
>Ranma which was always a pervy ecchi series meant for older teen males?
Rumiko has never made a show for men. Even Inuyasha was called "DBZ for girls" back in the day. I would go so far as to say that there is no such thing as a romcom for males.

>>283113525
>romcom for males
Orange Road.

The Time Bokan/Yatterman series had a running gag where they main antagonists would end up naked after a explosion or a slapstick gag, in the 2008 remake they constantly complain about not being able to show nudity and they also complain about not being able to drink alcohol or smoke anymore
the Ranma remake not only censored the nudity, they also censored words such as china and dialogue like Genma saying "You call yourself a MAN" was changed to "You call youself my SON" in the remake

>>283113615
Genderswapped Twilight is still for girls.

>>283110274
nipples isn't worth rewatching that crap for

>>283112069
more effort put into drawing that sweat bubble than most anime faces these days

>>283113653
No way. It's 100% guy cam. His two girlfriends are impossibly perfect.

i love boobs

>>283113885
Only Madoka was perfect. Hikaru was a dumb hoe.

>>283113346
They show the MC reacting to it and the angel going "yeah, I have both genders, hahaha!!"

>>283113525
>That doesn't matter since other shows for children did show nipples.
Sailor Moon like other Toeislop isn’t just any “show for children” though, but literal toddlers. With kigs and everything. It was a Kodomo, and Kodomo has always been especially strict in what they can show.

>>283111515
Yay. Someone remembers nightwalker.

>>283112767
Inuyasha also removed nipples and censored bath scenes.

Nipples are normal and should be acceptable, especially as men are allowed to show them pretty much any time they want. Stop trying to give young girls dysmorphia.

>>283114084
Your right, shame on the old Ranma anime and manga for trying to give young boys dysmorphia. Give men their nipples!

>>283113525
>Rumiko has never made a show for men.
Newfag alert, literally all her works are either shonen or seinen.

>I would go so far as to say that there is no such thing as a romcom for males.
What do you call the harem genre then?

>>283111672
Seriously what is up with that. What started this trend

>>283111831
>>283111880
>>283111914
>>283111936
I want you to know that you're a hero and we appreciate your work anon. You're one of the few here who still care about anime/manga. Please never leave us (and keep posting these amazing webms/screenshots).

Sleeping Ranma seems to be ready for something.

>>283113446
>Ranma
>Not ecchi
Now you zoomer faggots are literally trying to rewrite history, Ranma was always known as THE ecchi series back in the day, in fact not only was it ecchi but it was the franchise that pioneered the whole ecchi harem genre to begin with.

>>283109938 (OP)
Good, I hate nipples.

>>283109938 (OP)
There isn't much in 1989 version.
What did you consume anon?

>>283110196
cursed body

>>283114154
I mean, yeah. Let's all have nipples because we do. Getting weird about anything but genitals isn't healthy.

>>283114375
It's not really his body. It has the typical mind of it's own, but he's not as used to it as a real girl would be. So you could basically sleep next to him and sleep fuck a mindless sex monster.

>>283114220
>What do you call the harem genre then?
>What do you call something that is never romantic and almost never comedic?
I call it harem slop.

>>283114403
What's ecchi mean then to you then anon? Is Inuyasha an ecchi series due to its large amounts of nudity? Is Dragon Ball an ecchi series due to Roshi, shota dick, and Bulma?

To me an ecchi series is one that's sexual in nature (panty shots, focus on breasts, character actions, etc). A series that simply has casual nudity or uses it for the occasional gag isn't really ecchi.

>>283114717
So where's the outcry been about men missing nipples in anime/manga? Seems like everyone was fine with it until now.

>>283115146
that would be gay. and ranma his no homo

>>283111455
>>283111914
>It should not be judged on whether or not it features nipples.
>Putting a focus on the latter takes away focus from the former.
Except it doesn't, what are you talking about? just because I want to see nipples doesn't magically mean I don't want to see any of the other stuff you mentioned, otherwise we wouldn't be complaining in the first place and would be reading/watching hentai instead. It's like saying that because I want to see blood once again in the Dragon ball anime I don't care about the plot, character development, world building, etc. (I know DB is a stupid example but you get the point). Yes, some anons are pervs (always been) and just want to see bobs and vagene, and the japs themselves often include nudity as fanservice, but nudity itself isn't perverted and personally I don't like it being censored because of stupid reasons. The Ranma remake isn't targeted at babies afaik, it's for fans of the original show, adults. Adults shouldn't be scared of nipples, specially when used in a non-perverted context, and even if that was the case we should be mature enough to know the show is more than that.

>>283109938 (OP)
Bad, I love nipples.

>>283115254
>just because I want to see nipples doesn't magically mean I don't want to see any of the other stuff you mentioned
That's not what I am saying. I am saying that focus is a pie chart. Your attention can never exceed 100% of your attention. If 5% of your attention is on nipples, then that 5% of your attention cannot be focused on anything else.
>Dragonball
Blood in Dragonball is actually plot/worldbuilding relevant, so it's not a great example but for a different reason than you think. If an attack can't even make the fighter bleed, then it is hard to take it as threatening. Early DBZ fights had bones cracking and holes being opened in people constantly. The stakes were visibly high and it added to the tension.
>it's for fans of the original show
You're wrong in this assessment. This version of Ranma is for the same age demographic as the original manga, and the original show: teens. Adults are watching it, like adults swarm Pokemon cards, but that doesn't make the product intended for adults.
Now I won't deny that restrictions on teen media have gotten tighter in some places, but plenty of shows for teens have featured mannequin nudity so it happening in a currently-airing show for teens is not noteworthy.

>>283110196
Surely being able to write "UNCENSORED!" on the back of the BD case would encourage people to rewatch the series? I assume it'll get the equivalent of a 15 rating anyway so putting the nipples back on shouldn't affect how many people you can sell it to.

Nipples > nipple bumps > dots = darker circles > Barbie breasts > hair > steam > light beams

>>283115146
Everywhere but twitter since there was internets. You live in a bubble.

>>283115489
Maybe I'm a midwit but I don't get wat are you trying to say. I don't care if another dozen shows have omitted nipples before, because I haven't watched them, and I'm not saying it's the most important aspect of the show, all I'm saying is that I care about the issue, and I do because I'm a fan of the original show and manga, so of course I'm going to notice such differences. I don't like censorship, specially because of trivial reasons, it is because it's offensive? shameful? inappropriate? I don't think it's any of those, but it is stupid, and I dislike seeing people say it's irrelevant or unimportant, if that was the case then it wouldn't be in the original material in the first place, and as mundane as it may seem, I understand why some people complain about it, myself included. It's not necessary to enjoy the show, but it's part of it.

>>283115962
It's a chat bot. Start talking about sandwiches like they are sexual organs that need censored.

>>283113569
>>283114333

>>283113621
A weird example I can think of is El Hazard, the original OVAs had nipples, but the first TV series had no nipples and then the second TV series had nipples again, all in the 90s

>>283114623
The 1988 version had more noticeable nipples in later season (5-7), even if 99% of the nudity was female Ranma

>>283115962
There's nothing wrong with noticing and being bothered by things for being a change from the manga. That's a reasonable complaint, but it's also one that is rarely made by the louder "we just want more nipples in everything" crowd. I'm not seeking to lump you into one crowd or another, but I am also speaking with multiple people at once so forgive me if wires get crossed. This thread has a Ranma OP but the 4th image is Qwaser. I did not come into the thread from the angle of "I care about consistency with the manga." It started off closer to "everything should be soft core porn," when Ranma never was.
I also agree with you that censorship is an issue, but undoing the 40-year push for that (since Ranma's manga started) is a process. I see mannequin nudity as a big step up from light beams and cropping scenes. I more or less agree with >>283115910, though I would put the hair-covers nipples higher up.

>>283115999
Why are you so intimidated by honest conversation? I'm not calling anyone names or belittling anyone, I am expressing a viewpoint.

>>283116112
My wife

>>283115066
Ranma had significantly more nudity than either Inuyasha or Dragon Ball.

>To me an ecchi series is one that's sexual in nature
>character actions
Did you miss the entire character of Happosai and how Ranma himself frequently whores out his female body? Hell, it’s entire gender-bending premise used to be considered really pervy until the troons made their troonery into activism and forced it into the mainstream public.

Even it’s very ENVIRONMENT is meant to facilitate fanservice and nude scenes since a lot of Ranma takes place in bathhouses due to the whole water being the trigger for the transformation aspect of the curse.

>>283116402
was it really the trannies that paddled for mainstream recognition? or was it just your jew algorithms

>>283109938 (OP)
This entire thread sure is sus for wanting to see the nipples of characters that are minors…

>>283116645
You're not fooling anyone.

>>283116112
>99% of the nudity was female Ranma
So tranny fetish slop?

>>283115146
People have been complaining about it forever, but it's less emotional because it's because of artists being lazy and not censorship

I still like the freaky featureless boobs more than the retarded hair censorship.

>>283116402
It's basically boob jokes. Why do gaijin not tell good boob jokes?

>>283117425
Goku's nipples were removed a few times. It remains an outrage.

>>283117458
This. I can fap to Ranma's barbie boobs.

>>283116050
>>283116080
Based
>>283117034
Ranma-chan is female tho, it is magic after all

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283116112
>>283118884
Barbie Doll Shampoo

>>283119019
1989 version didn't have Barbie Doll bodies.
And I think Rumiko and Animators used actual model bodies as reference.

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283119019

>>283119878
Poor Ranma can't even shit now

manga readers is this arc with shampoo grandmother going to end in the next episode or the one after based on the pace?

>>283121020
I think Happosai Bathhouse episode would be considered "offensive" by "Modern" Western Audience and will be skipped entirely, since it's within the same season.

>>283114154
Yes. Right on!

>>283110196
Things have gotten so bad lately
Who is the bluray market even for anymore

>>283111635
wow
everything got worse

>>283112767
>show for 6 year old girls
that character model is accurate to the toys they sold

>>283114623
Man, Akane looked soooooo much better when she had long hair.

Even code geass had nipples and thats a mainstream normie anime. FREE THE NIPPLE

>>283121020
Next episode will conclude the cat's tongue arc, chapters 48-50.

>knew nipples wouldn't be visible
>retards STILL watching a remake they hate and taking the bait

Why is it that all modern Ranma threads are just about nipples? Do people not care about this series anymore?

>>283121758
Code Geass is almost 20 years old.

>>283122589
anon, the series is well over 35 years old, the people nipple shitposting probably weren't even alive when it was published/aired.

>>283121758
It was a late night show in season 1.

>>283122679
And, yeah, this.

>>283110196
>>283109938 (OP)
Only fans edit will save man boobs

>>283113964
Now show futa angels nude

>>283109938 (OP)
Why bother? Does getting a rating means the product is more appropriate for a younger audience really going to help sell these things?

>>283123101
>getting a rating means the product is more appropriate for a younger audience
It can’t when Happosai still exists as a character.

>>283122589
It's honestly exhausting at this point. You can't talk about Ranma 1/2 on 4chan anymore without retards spazzing out about the nudity being censored.

>>283122589
>Why is it that all modern Ranma threads are just about nipples? Do people not care about this series anymore?
The opposite, it’s BECAUSE we care that we’re speaking out. Ranma is one of the most famous and classic ecchi series, image removing the nudity from an ecchi, it’s like removing the transformation/henshin sequences of a Magical Girl anime, or the mechs from a Mecha.

>>283116216
>Ranma was never soft-core porn
It’s an ecchi so it basically was.

>>283121758
Nipples weren't a selling point of the series.

>>283123318
>image removing the nudity from an ecchi
*imagine I meant

>>283123318
>It’s an ecchi so it basically was.
Ecchi isn't a genre in Japan.

You people watched Ranma for the ecchi and not for the martial arts and stories?

>>283109938 (OP)
fucking proof that americunts are ruining global culture

>>283119019
Not barbie doll enough. There's still the illusion nipples might be beneath her hair. Picrel is true barbie doll Xian Pu.

>>283123340
aint no one watching this anime just for nipples. If they were the season 1 would have failed

What the fuck happened? Fucking feminist, man

>>283123243
I guess it would've all been much better if neither Urusei Yatsura nor Ranma ever got reboots.

We lost the war ...

>>283111880
I don't remember any nipples in Turn A
Some nice butts though

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283110196
>>283111607
>buy bluray
>no fanservice
Anime is so corpo
It's fucking over lol

>>283109938 (OP)
That looks kinda gross. The plastic surgery bodies just aren't erotic.

>>283126079
Tranny body. Like pottery.

>>283123554
YES

Ukyo /ss/

>>283111455
stupid tranny, go back to X

>>283116402
I want to go back to when the troons hated Ranma because it made gender changing trivially simple compared to what they went through for a crude facsimile thereof.

>>283125173
Buy bluray for TWO HUNDRED BUCKS

>>283123763
Isn't it "shan" and not "xian"? 珊璞 shan pu.

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283110196
what's the point of the fucking bluray then?

>>283111515
Anything other than Mashin Hero?

>>283129607
Why would corporations put in extra effort to make a better product when retards will buy them regardless?

>>283129971
ah, the pokemon analogy

>>283129971
>>283130004
To be fair, the BD sales market barely exists and and even selling 10k copies is considered a success. Pretty much the only reason someone would realistically buy a BD is for uncensored/extra content

>>283129971
More retards will buy it if they put nips in.

>>283130376
Not when you include Chinese sales.

>>283109938 (OP)
is this yuri

>>283109938 (OP)
Our queen carried the episode as usual. Honestly if they should just make her the main character if they wanna save the show from cancellation.

>>283130615
its getting ridiculous, even Kuno and Ryoga which were my favs in the og are boring now.

>>283130680
Mousse in the manga is a Milhouse character basically, he has some moments but the humor is that he is an awkward megane man

>>283125155
There is a scene where the main cast girls are in a pool or something and they show nipples there iirc.

>>283111515
>>283111880

>>283130547
Yes, the two main girls - Akane and Ranma - get married.

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283110196
I'm so conflicted... Female Ranma seems a lot less bustier than in the original anime, which I don't like.
But also looks quite more muscular, which I like.

not surprisingly troon yurifags like rankane

>>283130615
>they should just make her the main character if they wanna save the show from cancellation.
We have Urusei Yatsura at home…

>>283130615
Ranma 1/2 is a Shampoo humiliation ritual.

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283110196
This is the only part I don't understand, because you can make the argument of studios trying to air this around the world and making it possible by censoring things here and there, is something you can understand despite how much bullshit you think it is, but what would be the point of censoring BDs? The product that is only ever bought to get the full product without any censorship, by doing this you kill the purpose of selling discs at all. I just don't understand.

>>283131041
>Ranma 1/2 is a Shampoo humiliation ritual.
Rumiko’s very own Revenge Of The Nerds after Lum made Rumiko into a humiliation ritual.

>>283131047
They already made a censored version, and burning that to BDs is cheap and easy. What would be the point in spending extra money to make an uncensored version for a dead medium?

>>283129516
>I want to go back to when the troons hated Ranma because it made gender changing trivially simple compared to what they went through for a crude facsimile thereof.
Troons used to hate Ranma? First I’ve heard of this. All I’ve seen everywhere are troons bleating how Ranma as a series is a “LGBTQ icon” and that it helped crack many an egg back in the day because troons looked at Ranma and went “they’re just like me! Fr, fr.”

When did the troons ever hate Ranma?

>>283131143
>back in the day
>Fr, fr
Troons existed before you or even your parents did, zoomer-chan

>>283115910
woah? source?

>>283131041
How thou? Even in the latest chapters where there is one chapter dedicated to Ranma having to touch her ass to unlock her anger pressure point
>yes its actually the plot
And Rumiko tells Ranma has to do it so Shampoo will be happy again.
It feels like the whole manga is cuckqueen fantasy because what stopped Ranma and Akane from get ring together in 50 chapter for example?

>>283131898
It just aired like a year or 2 ago, how fucking new are you?

>>283111455
As someone born in the late 90s I notice millennials tend to live in the past and refuse to adapt to the changing world (boomers are the worst and Gen X too to a certain extent but I doubt people in the 50s still browse 4chan), I wonder why that is?

>>283132150
As someone born in the early 80s I'm pretty sure that the majority of people who are bitching are younger than you.

>>283111541
This is cope to think your grievances are important otherwise you are just a loser fighting for anime tits. These people NEVER ponder why their activism doesn't lead to any real backlash despite their "victories".

>>283132020
>Implying I watch isekai shit

>>283132185
Then don't ask.

>>283130744
bathing in a river iirc
brief shot but it has nipple
early episode like first 5 at a guess.

>>283114220
There are tons shonen that are aimed at female audiences, that are only in shonen magazines as battle shojo's can only be baby shit, or because a weekly shonen magazine gives more eyeballs than a monthly shojo magazine. Do you really think that Rumiko isn't aiming for a female audience primary with her manga?

>>283123554
>martial arts
Who the fuck cares about the martial arts in Ranma? It's dogshit. People that watch Ranma for the slice of life and romcom.

>>283132300
>Do you really think that Rumiko isn't aiming for a female audience primary with her manga?
A manga for a female audience wouldn’t have non-stop nudity and fanservice, harem hijinks, a character like Happosai, nor obvious male fetishes like trannies and AGP.

>>283132419
>nobody likes the fights
How depressing. Shishi...hoko...

>>283131941
>It feels like the whole manga is cuckqueen fantasy
Rumiko’s always had a cuckqueen fetish, you should’ve seen Inuyasha where Rumiko has Inuyasha make out with Kikyo in front of Kagome TWICE while never letting him and Kagome kiss.

>>283132421
>A manga for a female audience wouldn’t have non-stop nudity and fan service
I can easily disprove this
>nor obvious male fetishes like trannies and AGP
Shojo's are full of both of those things, even shit made children's such as Sailor Moon has it.

>>283132772
Try that again, but this time as someone who actually speaks English

>>283132493
She has a cuckolding fetish in general. In UY it's Lum that constantly cucks Ataru.

>>283132493
Doesn't Inuyasha get cucked by Kikyo himself?

NippleGate

>endless tits on the internet
>don't care
>uncensored nipple aired on public TV
>wowzers!!
Why is it like this bros?

>>283134070
Scarcity creates value

>>283110196
Souless

>>283119878
Cringe

Free the nipple

>>283134070
>who cares
>but i weirdly care
>it's just a small detail
then why it got removed in the first place?
are nipples too hot for zoomers?

>>283134294
Based

>>283109938 (OP)
smartest Akane fan

>>283109938 (OP)
there's much better things in life than obsessing over the nipples of fictional schoolkids

>>283135018
Doesn't that make Takahashi a pedo then that she showed naked kids in her manga??

>>283135123
that has nothing at all to do with the spirit of my post

>>283109938 (OP)
Who will be the Autist to edit all the breasts to have nipples and everything else to make it uncensored

>>283135655
you

>>283131143
About 20 years ago, maybe more. They hated all the "ez gender switch" stuff like Ranma, Belt of gender changing(D&D), etc. Because in their minds, it made a mockery of the years of psychological evaluations, "living as the target gender"(aka actually TRYING to "pass"), and the pain of surgeries and incompatible hormones they were forcing upon themselves. Somewhere along the way, probably with the forced "acceptance" society brought about during the Obama era, as well as the easier access to surgery(reduced psychological checks, because they complained it was eating up their finances), they started to embrace it, retroactively claiming it cracked their egg. Also, I guess the "old guard" from 20 years ago either offed themselves or died(they were at least in their 30s back then; because of the financial base you'd need to even consider all the ops and lifetime hormones; so close to 50 or even 60 by now).

>>283136130
1/10 not worth caring about

>>283136166
(you)

>>283136191
chatbot behavior

>>283136233
pretend you're a tranny and kys

>>283113116
Why have nudity at all If it's basically just a skin colored suit?

>>283136379
Because reasons

>>283136379
hit up a brothel and find out

>>283134821
>New Ranma fanbook getting released
Will we finally get our answer after so many years about whether female Ranma can get pregnant or not?

I'm pretty convinced most of these nipples lament posters never watched any Ranma and have only been exposed to booru uploads from the late 00s that compiled nearly every nipples shot and they know nothing else.

>>283136901
Author answered with "Don't think about that."

>>283111649
Gross

>>283111880
>>283111936
>>283113194
>>283113500

>>283137465
>pretty convinced
More like pretty dumb.

>>283112408
It's from the pilot, technically separate from the show, still on bluray though. It's more a montage than an episode

I usually don't care about this shit but getting rid of nipples in Ranma is where I draw the line. I'm going back to 90s VHS tapes.

>>283137491
Shizuka a cute

>>283112767
Cutey honey had nipples

>>283113194
Children's anime was okay with showing nipples during the 70s, 80s and most of the 90s, some even showed dicks, like the 90s Kitaro
>>283113621
Yatterman was kino, I love Doronjo

>>283116112
>99% of the nudity was of the tranny
What did they mean by this?

>>283136012
Troons barely had any online presence 20 years ago and they were a non-factor until tumblr popularized them in the early 10's.

>>283110196
History repeats itself

>>283136455
why would i do that? jew

>>283137893
That and considering the identical behavior of otherkin they weren't taken very seriously either.

>>283113621
>top left
Ahegao but used in a non horny way

>>283137465
It's the only question that matters though

>>283109938 (OP)
>Classic fanservice anime
>Remove the fanservice
Who's the audience for this crap, Jewish investors?

>>283139223
Don't forget Blue Gender

>>283139259
Sony has largely monopolized worldwide distribution and thus has pull on these types of decisions. I don't think this is the death spiral everyone thinks it is considering these characters are teenagers, just an unfortunate casualty of Sony's policies that happens to tug on the heart strings of those who were sexually awakened by the original show. Another remake with adult characters could go untouched. But hey, I could be wrong and this is a sign of a death spiral of traditions. You could blame Sony for bucking and streamlining everything for market compatibility, but maybe instead blame American Christian nationalists who actually hold and wield power to ban shit like in Texas.

>>283134821
Only americans will be interested in the new anime so he's right to ask

>>283137893
Yup. Obama and okama. Sounds about right.

>>283139354
It was only one ot two episodes though.

>>283109938 (OP)
Still sexo

>>283139223
Sauce?

I want to be bred and impregnated by Kuno and give him a healthy brood of children.

>>283137793
>Cutey Honey
anime for teen and adult males

>Sailor Moon
anime for literal preschoolers

They are not the same.

Fuck Shampoo

>>283112767
The SM manga also just has barbie nudity so it's accurate

>>283109938 (OP)
Nippan has completely lost its nerve. Once they were a beacon of originality and creative freedom, now they're just a slop factory.

We have a wiki site that lists bath scenes in anime, yet to date we don't have a complete list of anime shows that include nudity.

>>283148714
Be the change you want to see anon
This thread is a good start

>>283136012
>I guess the "old guard" from 20 years ago either offed themselves or died
Or, more likely, they simply moved on and aren't as big into anime anymore. I know /a/ thinks that's inconceivable but it happens and it's common. Back in the day, Terence Tao was a huge anime fan and his favorite anime was Ranma 1/2. I doubt he's much involved with the anime fandom now at 50 years old.

>>283111515
>>283111880
I miss flying giant naked woman (with nipples) in my anime ops.

>>283109938 (OP)
>>283110196
Why can't you coomers just watch porn if you want to see nipples so badly?

>>283151408
Literally part of the show but ok keep wanting censorship dumb tranny

>>283132421
>A manga for a female audience wouldn’t have non-stop nudity and fanservice, harem hijinks, a character like Happosai, nor obvious male fetishes like trannies and AGP.

Women will overlook that stuff because the manga also centers around a romance with a self-insertable character (Akane in the case of Ranma 1/2). That's how she gets both male and female readers and that's why she's the richest woman in Japan. One-sided autistic shounen writers aren't capable of doing this.

>>283111455
it works when it's brief and not front and center for a relativelylong period of time, especially if it's not from a series that used to show off the goods.

>>283113194
Based Doraemon

>>283113621
>>283137814

>>283111635
>>283111831

>>283152798
Based

>>283152490
>Women will overlook that stuff because the manga also centers around a romance with a self-insertable character (Akane in the case of Ranma 1/2).
Don’t forget Ranma/Ryoga fujobaiting.

>>283111515
Flame Of Recca as well

>>283151878
>dumb tranny
Literally “also part of the show” chud, so don’t act surprised that Ranma’s attracted a tranny audience.

>>283114009
Doraemon was for adulrs

>>283146552
>Creativity is when fanservice of minors
Fuck off

>>283109938 (OP)
FTFY

>>283139920
>ban shit like in Texas
Did that ever amount to anything?

>>283154308
You have to be 18 or older to use 4chan. Banned.

>>283155102
>not the heckin nipplerinoooo
anon...

>>283129607
So that you can own something and be happy, I guess...?
But they're too expensive for that.

>>283109938 (OP)
This is nothing new.
In 2017 the idea of adding nipples to blu-rays was already out of fashion, as seen in this mangaka's recollection about Konohana Kitan (the manga tankoubons had nipples so she wanted the anime BDs to have them too, but the anime producer said no).
Of course, male nipples are perfectly fine.

>>283137987
>>283138088

>>283155470
>needing to purchase commodities to feel happy

>>283156054
I meant that as the opposite of "you will own nothing and be happy"

>>283155632
What blu ray release has ever added nipples? I dont mean unobscured steam or light, but actually added nipples to a barbie

>>283123016
>implying modern anime fans have the skill or patience to meticulously edit every frame to add nipples
it's not the 90s anymore, anime is only watched by 87IQ Hispanics and South Asians these days

>>283156962
???
Are you retarded???
You don't "add" nipples, you draw the body normally, hide the nipples in 5 seconds in aftereffects for TV, and then just remove the censor layer in the BD.

>>283157179
he said fan edits, illiterate-kun.

>>283157247
You expect me to read the entire post and its context before replying?
I just skim it for 0.1 seconds for keywords, decide which of my boogymen to headcanon the poster as, and then write an aggressive reply to what I imagined him as saying.

>>283156962
Just use AI

>>283156926
Welcome to the NHK

>>283156926
Dragonar Academy

>>283154014
>Doraemon was for adults
It was?