>>33236512
>You think the status quo of humanity is to be through and through prudish
Practically every major religious or philosophical tradition for the past 2000 years has had concepts of chastity. In the West, Christianity has had unambiguous moral teachings towards sex and marriage. Namely, that extramarital sex is wrong. And that's the standard I'm talking about when I mention sexual liberalism.
Obviously, that standard was far from a constant practice in historical societies,. If it were simple and natural, there wouldn't be rules to maintain it. Societal permissiveness isn't something unique to the modern day.
> If you think someone is "not a leftist per se" because they're getting laid
If you mean sex outside of marriage, then by definition they're sexually permissive. Do they necessarily think of themselves as driven by leftism? No. Are they nonetheless a product of a broadly left-liberal society? Yes.
That isn't a value judgement. It's a simple fact. So is the fact that I'm obviously not a "member of society". So what?
