Will emulating Andrew Tate finally get me respect in the workplace?
I’m 27

Without a shadow of doubt. 100%.

Dunno but I unironically like the Tate aesthetic
How do I best emulate it?

>>33281878 (OP)
>Andrew Tate
who?

>>33281878 (OP)
Depends on the workplace.
If you work on a construction site it could.
If you're in a corporate environment, probably not.

>>33281878 (OP)
>emulating Andrew Tate
>respect

>>33282027

>>33282032

>>33282037

>>33282011
Some gay muslim

As ridiculous as Tate is, he was a competitive combat sports athlete, and the internet character he created is semi-ironic.

If you start talking shit and ordering people around without any ability to back it up you'll just piss people off and possibly get your ass beat. It all comes down to whether the execution is self-aware or terminally autistic, and odds are it will be the latter.

>>33281878 (OP)
No. Says the 45yo engineer who maybe does more pullups than you.

>>33283171
Acting stupid ironically is still garbage behavior.
The problem with always mouthing off is that even if you're an unironic badass, you will eventually run into someone who does not give a fuck, whether it's someone with more power than you or a random paranoiac who happens to be carrying a holdout when you shove him in the chest. Or you beat someone up, and he comes back and shoots you in the back of the head.
Picking fights of any kind is a kind of gamble, and if you gamble enough, eventually you'll lose big time.
Wasn't he being investigated for drug trafficking? Guess it never came through.

>>33281878 (OP)
Even a broken clock is right twice a day; Tait has a lot of confidence and most people will follow that blindly, but his ideals of success revolving around money and status instead of personal happiness and fulfillment are hollow and following those ideals will leave you in a bad way.

Look up Noel Dyzel, he's a class act and has some real wisdom to share. I also suggest reading up on stoicism.

>>33281878 (OP)
Tate is a taint

>>33282011
Manosphere grifter that shitskins like.

>>33282041
just surround yourself with gold diggers bro!

>>33283549
I never understood this saying. If I break the hands off the clock is it still right twice a day?

no, he's a complete of shit that only sub 100 IQ meatheads think is impressive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyQm4O9G7OM&list=RDUyQm4O9G7OM&start_radio=1

>>33281878 (OP)
Lol no
You get respect by doing good work and disrespecting karens

>>33281878 (OP)
I could absolutely take him. Before it would get a "ha" now it would get a "yeah, easily."

Emulating another man is the gayest thing you can do. Might as well start wearing a dress and tell people to call you "Nancy."

>>33284769
imagine having a sub 500iq

Is this guy even still a thing in 2025

.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4FLjV35h0M

>>33281878 (OP)
Andrew Tate has money and success backing him; mimicking him won't grant you that. You're just going to be a dude pretending to be someone he's not.

>>33283312
>maybe
You don't sound very sure of yourself there, do you?

>>33284477
If a clock stops where the hands are, in a 24 hour period it can still read the correct time twice.

It means that even when things are almost heretically wrong you can still find a sliver of Truth

No

>>33286670
What if there are no hands though?

>>33286720
you're reading too much into the analogy because you're upset you didn't get it autist

>>33286748
It just doesn't make sense. If the clock has no hands how can it tell the right time twice a day.

>>33286760
retard

>>33281983
Have a tiny penis and do a lot of blow

>>33281878 (OP)
Yes
>>33286705
Retard

>>33286799
You sir are the retard

>>33286864
>spends all thread misunderstanding a common english saying
>"n-no ur da retard..."
just take the L, ESL

>>33286872
>doesn't understand basic logic

>>33286720
If it has no hands the analogy falls apart, the saying falls under the pretext of the clock ceasing to function not being destroyed or dismantled.

Clock stopped working, broke, but wasn't physically damaged.

>>33284477
If the hands break off it's never wrong.

yeah, especially to your boss or hiring manager no doubt

>>33281878 (OP)
No. You'll only wonder why people don't want to be around you.

>>33285126
Misogynistic homophobe lol. And some of you wonder why people don't want to be around you losers when all you do is dehumanize them. Lmao look in the mirror. The worst thing a man can be isn't being compared to women or being gay, it's being a man that can't self reflect.

>>33289669
>Misogynynistic homophobe
Nice buzzwords