>>33301871>Its not about that, I'm just wondering how well getting attention from girls works as a metric for a man's attractiveness. Its obvious that highly attractive men get plenty of attention from girls without effort, and even average guys have rare moments where girls make the first move. So I think its reasonable to assume if you get 0 attention over 30+ years you must be a lost causeThe thing is you can be generally unattractive to women for a very long time but that doesn't make it a curse you're doomed to for life.
I'm taller than 6 foot, always was strong, and never smiled/showed emotion on my face because of Asperger's, and didn't talk to people because I had a bad diet and it made me introverted and cranky. I got to 24 without really talking to women, so about a decade.
...but I was never doomed despite that. I was actually attractive by default, once I learned to not sit with defensive body posture and managed what I ate. Women actually are attracted to a tall, strong, stoic guy, its just intimidating without any warmth or signals of safety
The whole thing you're getting wrong like most guys on here is seeing long term unattractiveness as calcifying and impermeable. There are guys with horrible Klinefelter's syndrome or whatever that truly are permanently undateable. But in most cases? You can be long term generally unattractive and still only need to put real effort into one or two things. The wheels not greased but only one gear or two really needs to get whacked.