Thread 33565192

is it possible to become a depthful person when I'm naturally not? How do I hold a conversation involving things like philosophy, psychology, sciences, medical experience, interpersonal relations

>>33565192 (OP)
Not by saying stupid shit like "depthful", not even a word.

>>33565194
not a broadly accepted one.

>>33565192 (OP)
>How do I hold a conversation involving things like philosophy, psychology, sciences, medical experience, interpersonal relations

why would you? what have people gained by ever doing that? so much hubris

>>33565207
No, it just is not a word. "I use a word I made up" doesn't get to be defended with "w-well it's a REAL word it just isn't used broadly...because...well, only I use it, but still...". You're a retard, especailly if you want to talk about "how do I hold a conversation" and your response to something is "UHHH ACTKTUALLYL LAY ITS WARO DTO MTE!!!!".

Just shut the fuck up. Nobody wants to talk to you anywhere, you're a loser.

>>33565258
not OP but you are human garbage

>>33565192 (OP)
Just say "deep," but don't worry about being so, just follow your interests.

As to your question, if you are curious and read widely you will naturally be able to have a conversation about anything. If you are talking to someone who is an accredited expert, or even if you are a bit light in your understanding of a field that your interlocutor is interested in, you can ask sensible questions based on what you do know. People love explaining things they are interested in and have a deep knowledge of, and will believe that you are a smart person to be asking such questions.

By the way, if you're short on time, go to your favourite shadow library, search for "very short introductions" and download and read all of them.

>>33565288
>Just say "deep," but don't worry about being so, just follow your interests.
>
>As to your question, if you are curious and read widely you will naturally be able to have a conversation about anything. If you are talking to someone who is an accredited expert, or even if you are a bit light in your understanding of a field that your interlocutor is interested in, you can ask sensible questions based on what you do know. People love explaining things they are interested in and have a deep knowledge of, and will believe that you are a smart person to be asking such questions.
>
>By the way, if you're short on time, go to your favourite shadow library, search for "very short introductions" and download and read all of them.

Saved this. Thanks for the good response.

>>33565281
Just shut the fuck up, you're a loser nobody wants to talk to, no you cannot become "depthful" you fucking buffoon. Speaking in words you made up to sound smart is definitely not how to become smart.

>>33565304
no need to get nervous, get a grip

read a lot of things. do a lot of things.

>>33565192 (OP)
Why do you want to be deep? This should not matter, specially in conversations, communication and conversations is about connecting with each other on a deep level, open up your heart, and feeling comfortable. It's not about flexing knowledge. If you want to be "deep" and learn new things, don't do it for the sole purpose to have conversations, do it for the love of knowledge, most people that are "deep" rarely converse with others. They are usually busy engrossing in studying things they love.

>>33565310
Grip this, bitch *grips his own dick*

>>33565281
why would anyone but OP be offended at that post? you're OP

>>33565192 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yat0ZKduW18&list=PL9GwT4_YRZdBf9nIUHs0zjrnUVl-KBNSM