To save nature, it is not enough to just help the environment by not littering or by making companies more environmentally friendly. We must have human extermination. They have tried everything to save the planet and we no longer have time for pro-life plans. We have to go to extremes to at least save other species. My ideas for extermination would be free euthanasia injections in pharmacies, legalized abortion. If a woman has a child, the punishment will be death for both of them.
The elderly and disabled will be exterminated since they are no longer useful to society.

In the end, environmentalism and animal rights are just extreme non-discriminating outgroup preference typical of the parasitic nobility of society

"Take the nation, take the serfs, burn the castles, just not mine, and I'll join you whoever you are" has been their motto since time immemorial

>>4996988
midwit take

>>4996988
High IQ take

>>4997014
It only takes a midwit to guess at it, but it takes a genius to be certain that it's truth.

>>4997031
Slogans and bumperstickers

>>4997031
nah you are a fucking midwit because like most incels on this site, you're only capable of arguing things at the extremes and are allergic to all nuance

>>4997036
See how angry you are? That's because you got instantly btfo by this
>In the end, environmentalism and animal rights are just extreme non-discriminating outgroup preference typical of the parasitic nobility of society
>"Take the nation, take the serfs, burn the castles, just not mine, and I'll join you whoever you are" has been their motto since time immemorial
Notice they never want everyone to live in acceptable harmony with nature, everyone has to burn, but oh no, not them, they stay comfy and "advocate".

>oh you care about the environment? that means you want humanity to go extinct!
not engaging in your midwit kikery, sorry

>>4996966 (OP)
You first

>>4997039
Yes, the leech quoted in the OP does want humanity to go extinct.

Vegans want to starve people.

Climate activists want electricity and transit rationed.

And it never starts with or reaches themselves. Buy the prius, also, check out my new jet.

>>4997036
What fucking nuance? OP is calling for worldwide extermination. Either you agree or you don't.

Ahhh, another thread by the anti-vegan schizo. Y'all know what to do.

>>4997036
Baitrald

>>4997106
>bottom left
holy fuck...

>>4997056
vegans are only slightly less consistently dunked on than jews. it's not the same person every time, it's everyone's anti-establishment talking points because the universal right wing belief is that progressive leftism's vegans will be as bad for public nutrition as globohomo's fortified junk food.

also, china really fucking hate veganism and animal rights radicalism to the point of going against common sense out of contrarianism. xi officially sees it as a subversive western cult meant to weaken societies. so there's some wumao in there.

>>4997106
kek

And just decimate 70% of the population whilst we have an infrastructure that required billions to function and not self-destroy ?

Nearly all of the current global industrial lnfrastructure including energy and military require proper, careful maintenance in order to avoid disasters. Nuclear powerplants and nuclear waste disposal sites need to be connected to a wider grid and kept in working order at all times. Ammunition depots require maintenance or else they either risk leaking hazardous materials out or ignite and fuck shits up if anything happens to them. Decay of the very gears that keep our civilization running has only been kept at bay so far because of the continuous effort of the global capitalistic trades everywhere to produce and maintain production. Abandonning all of that infrastructure due to an universal self-extinction event would only leave on the planet a incredible number of ticking time-bombs everywhere. Life on earth would be permanently affected and poisonned by it. I get that human-activity globally need to be put to a halt for the biosphere to adapt and hopefully regenerate, but as is, without a proper dismantling and handling of all of our now-obsolete infrastructute and components, we're only going out irish style and leaving everything else a nice nasty fucking gift behind.

>>4997119
>xi
He's right. From Quakers to Seventh Day Adventists to modern vegans in the west at least there's always been a cult behind it pushing for it to suit their agenda. Even if it's been secularized the agenda, methods and oddly funding sources are mostly the same.

But this has almost nothing to do with Linkola since he wasn't some "animals are the only form of life that matters" simpleton.

>>4997122
That a woman btw.

>>4997122
the biosphere is less important than human activity

it has never mattered if it is a nicobar pigeon or a city pigeon. life changes. big deal.

>>4997236
the bioshphere is the global equilbrium point upon which all of life is based. If there is no healthy biosphere, there is no healthy life anywhere. If there is no biosphere, there simply isnt any life. you're just confused, anon

>>4997119
china wages war on falun gong practistioners which is just a wacky form of yoga. China wages war on anything that isn't its own government. Fuck, these idiots once waged war on their own fauna with disastrous results. Making a point out of china hating any specific movement doesnt mean shit given how eager they are to attempt to nuke any and all belief, concept, or even just natural element that arent pro ccp lmao

>>4997038
There is no peace when nature is already at its limit, it is impossible to have harmony because the planet is already very degraded and we do not have time for passive thoughts.

>>4997469
>>4997286
>wolves go extinct
In 2 more weeks the planet will collapse
>nothing happens

This keeps happening. Life is anti-fragile and the biosphere is more than capable of making some concessions. Being anti-human is pointless. It's like being anti-bird.
>insect evolution is being suppressed!

>>4997122
The planet will not be harmed as much as if humans were here. With humans it is in the long term and stronger, but without humans it will affect it but it can be recovered. With people the problem remains and the degradation will increase more and more.

>>4997485
you keep talking about "the planet" like it's an individual thing, but its actually a label humans assigned to the present state of a giant rock

>>4997495
How am I supposed to address the planet without using that name? You didn't show any argument, you were just trying to refute me because I use "planet"

>>4997495
maybe he's a ayylmao

>>4996988

>>4996966 (OP)
>the earth is being polluted, overpopulation is destroying the environment and killing animals
>which group of humans is polluting the most
>which group of humans treats animals the worst
>which group of humans has the highest birthrate
>ermmm yikes chuddy I don't like the answer to those questions
>kill a bunch of random people
>the earth dies