Post paleoart.

>>5012420
YJK

>>5012419 (OP)
>inb4 50 year olds seething because modern paleoart doesn't look like their picture books from the 1950s

>>5012513
The science is settled.

>>5012419 (OP)
I think it's important to point out that, in the original post this came from, this wasn't so much a serious Deinonychus attempt as it was to try and make Frontier's mess of a Deinonychus more appealing.

>>5012633
i dont remember deinonychus ever having a crest, its a dilphosaurus, and even then, they gave it whiskers, like a fucking rat

>>5012633
The scaly deinonychus looks better tho?

>>5012685
It's not even the scaliness that pisses me off, it's the extra tadpole ass fins that tip it over the edge.
Just trim those off and it's decent enough.

>>5012513
What the hell is this?

>>5012633
>>5012638
>>5012685
That's from Jurassic World Evolution. The reason they made it so fruity looking is because their in-game "Velociraptor" is actually based on Deinonychus, but they decided to actually add Deinonychus for some unexplained reason, but they wanted it to look different from the raptors, so they did...that.

>>5012707
That's not meant to be a scientific reproduction though. See: >>5012756

It's just a game mechanics issue.

>go to r/paleoart
>see picrel

>>5012759
>UGH! Why do you keep bringing up trannies?!
>Trannies in literally everything:

>>5012759
Btw this "Brontosaurus had neck horns" is totally made up speculative bullshit. There is zero actual fossil evidence for this. Sauropods also didn't have beaks. I can't believe I actually have to say that.

>>5012513
Lol I remembered Rockette T Rex when looking at this. Pic related. It was mounted like this by Robert T Bakker himself to debunk the idea that T Rex was a slow, sluggish, cold blooded tail dragging lizard and to show how agile and aerodynamic it could have possibly been.

>>5012759
It's my firmest belief that if reddit and Youttube comments were nuked off the internet, the world would be a better place.

>>5012755
Cre-tea-ceous party.

>>5012768
Apparently it's a random private museum.

>>5012763
Reddit yes, jewtube no. For some wild reason jewtube comments are mostly unregulated which means people are allowed to speak the truth there. Reddit has been proven repeatedly to just be a US government op.

>>5012777
Is anyone saw this as a weird hunchbacked sorta alien dog first, before noticing what it really was?

>>5012763
Also twitter, can't forget them
>>5012784
AAIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

>>5012849
THESE ARE LIKE REAL ANIMALS!!

>>5012419 (OP)

>>5012761
neck horns are cool though, i concede that

>>5012419 (OP)
>>5012777
This artist is currently getting his ass shredded on Twitter for drawing loli porn, porn of an underage (teen) character that explicitly references an IRL rape case, and for being a chud BTW

>>5013058
Elaborate

>>5012419 (OP)

>>5013058
Uh based

>>5013058
Wow, a featherfag is a sexual degenerate and a pedophile. This is so very shocking.

>>5013068
Goose?

>>5013072
CLEAN YOUR FUCKING PAINTBRUSH, MARK.

Why is "classic" t rex so ugly and gray anyway? Most lizards and birds are quite colorful.

>>5013082
And some are gray or brown. Your point?

>>5013089
Yeah, but even "ugly" lizards like crocs have other stuff going on, like elaborate scale patterns, decorative spines, fat belly, jowl or something. That t rex is just so drab and barebones looking. Was its enviroment just as grey? There's something off about it. It doesn't look like a real animal.

>>5013090
>It doesn't look like a real animal
Ok you had me for a second.
Here's your (You)

>>5013111
Wdym?
Was t rex a psyop all along?

>>5013061
He posted art of the JPIII Spino with an updated design and paleotwt decided to raise the alarm for his more extreme nsfw art. Most of the people bitching are either trannies or underage. Same people who tried to crusade against Klayton Fioriti for being a christfag

>>5013144
Are you defending a pedophile because he puts feathers on dinosaurs? Yeah, that sounds about right for a feathernigger.

>>5013144
So, another round of this?

>>5013183
Of featherfags being sick perverts? Always were.

>>5013192
Yeah, yeah, we get it. Jurassic Park was filmed using 100% real, accurate cloned dinosaurs, and all evidence of feathers in clade Dinosauria was planted by time-traveling Chinese agents who are trying to turn you gay.

>>5012759
Pushing tyrannical suicidal political views onto an animal that can't even begin to understand your nonsense is evil to an extent rarely seen

>>5013058
>Deleted his JP3 Spinosaurus drawing
Fucking pussy

>>5013202
It is still up on his Instagram though.

>>5013203
Oh damn thanks, hopefully he draws a couple more spinos before inevitably offing himself

>>5013165
This is so dumb

>>5013058
Who gives a fuck?

>>5013209
>gave enough of a fuck to reply
You do, evidently :)

>>5013214
What's the ragebait here?
Those colours are distinct enough to be a reference to something but i can't put my finger on what

>>5013250
Pretty sure anon was being genuine. Not sure what the colors on that pic would be referencing, if not living animals.
Now THIS is a reference.

>>5012762
What were the little hands for?

>>5013199
Why are you ignoring the fact that so many featherfags are sex criminals? That seems kind of important.

>>5013266
Being vestigial.

>>5013275
>so many featherfags are sex criminals?
Name em

>>5012707
No, the issue is the awful anatomy and skull which make it look like an oversized gekko, rather than a Maniraptoran

>>5013266
Apparently they were capable of lifting up to 400lbs, so carrying a dead prey item and keeping the mouth available as a weapon is not out of the realm of possibility

>>5013291
The anatomy and skull are based on the vintage boxy headed deinonychus reconstructions which will always be superior to realism shit

>>5013058
is that the same dude that made those warhammer mutants and maneater orks drawings? lmao

>>5013338
what fucking "superior" are you talking about nigger, it looks like a zesty roasted chicken
also those deinonychus you were talking about always sucked ass

>>5013177
>>5013192
>>5013275
Can you fuck off back to your schizo containment thread, this is the non schizoid thread.

>>5013287
The fag being discussed, Emily Willoughby, whose work is all over wikipedia and other paleontological literature. Brian Engh's own twitter posts for god sake. How many fucking trannies need to be in paleoart?

>>5013294
How they gonna pick it up. Go through the logistics of it for us.

>>5013275
>Why are you ignoring the fact that so many featherfags are sex criminals? That seems kind of important.
Drawing furry porn isn't a crime, achmed. And it's because science and intellectualism has always appealed to the polar opposite of right wing retards. It's like asking why all the college educated people are anti-racist. It's because they're smarter than you, dumbfuck.

>>5013389
Yes it is. I'm glad you admitted to being a jew though. It must have caused you physical pain to tell the truth, even accidentally.

>>5013388
as described here
https://dinodata.de/bibliothek/pdf_t/2020/60-Article_Text-316-1-10-20201126.pdf

>>5013395
No, it isn't, and socially conservative people are consistently the intellectual inferiors of socially liberal individuals by one standard deviation lol. You are literally too dumb to handle new ideas. You are the monkey that goes bananas when it sees an ape eat an apple for the first time in history.
>Jews bad! Jews are all the scientists! Everything is a conspiracy!
Jews, the race with an average IQ of 115?

>>5013583
It was rhetorical. They can't.

>>5013585
>Jews, the race with an average IQ of 115?
No.

Any other Hominin heads in this thread

>>5013381
Yes

>>5012762
>The Tyrannosaurus rex sculpture at the Denver Museum of Nature & Science (DMNS) was crafted by Louis Paul Jonas, a local taxidermist and sculptor. This particular T-rex is actually a sculpture, not a fossil, and was created in 1968.

>>5013058
mossa makes amazing art and I wish him the best

>>5013796
Why the whiskers? This isn't the first time I've seen them drawn on dinos and it makes no sense

>>5013921
Because furfags are unoriginal and now that one of them has done it they'll all be doing it.

>>5013921
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beak#Rictal_bristles

>>5013923
Wow furfags are very sexy and smart now.

>>5013921
>>5013923 (Me)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskers#In_birds

>>5013923
>>5013929
Granted, but whatever manitaptoran that's supposed to be doesn't have a beak

>>5013940
Ah I see your error. You think featherfags are operating on some sort of scientific basis. They're not. They never were.

>>5013940
>>5013960

It has a longer area without beak, so naturally the whiskers would be near the top. In birds they're restricted by the keratinous beak

>>5012419 (OP)
Feathered dinosaurs was such a funny meme. I can't believe how far it got before it died.

>>5013962
There are no whiskers, dummie.

>>5013964
Just goes to show you women, trannies and sois will go to any lengths to get attention.

>>5013972
Some of these theropods are missing their feathers

whiskers are just a speculative meme like sauropod inflatable sacs and abelisaurs humiliation rituals, only redditors and paleo"artists" like witton and engh (which aren't considered by serious paleontologists anyways) take these things seriously
people here should really chill down and stop giving paleoschizo so much attention

>>5013940
>but whatever manitaptoran that's supposed to be doesn't have a beak
Why would it not having a beak prevent it from having tactile sensory integumentary structures on its snout?

>>5013982
Whiskers don't even make sense for animals with binocular vision that don't dig around in the dirt/cloudy water. The entire purpose of whiskers is to provide tactile sensation of something you can't see, and if you can see it then they're useless.

>>5013987
Anything with a nose too big to see around needs whiskers. Have you seen a jew? Case closed.

>>5012779
>JUST

>>5013987
>what are cats

>>5013987
>Whiskers don't even make sense for animals with binocular vision that don't dig around in the dirt/cloudy water

>>5013987
Evolution is largely iterative and has a hard time removing things outright instead of stacking things ontop of each other. I swear, there are still way too many idiots that think evolution is about perfect optimization without redundancy and worthless vestigial features.

>>5014017
Evolution doesn't stack stuff

It deforms stuff. It duplicates stuff. It deletes stuff, and then copies stuff to fill the gap 1,000,000 years later. It gets stuff twisted around in embryonic development. Every evolutionary change starts as a horrendous deformity that somehow no one noticed.

Our body plan is actually segmented, like a bug. Our jaws are gills. Our thyroid gland is gills. Our ears are gills. You just never noticed. Thanks, evolution!

>>5013387
>Emily Willoughby
Damn, a woman into bestiality? Surely the markings of a feathernazi, truly unconceivable otherwise

>>5013972
These look pretty good, but that Therizinosaur looks like a samsquanch and it's hilarious. The T. rex has exactly the correct amount of tooth exposure although I wonder if the front teeth were a bit more exposed than that, since they used them for scraping.

>>5013982
Brian Engh's "work" appears in museums around the world and actual scientific papers, so no, it is the paleontologists who are wrong also. Mark Witton IS a paleontologist.

>>5014029
>He doesn't know

See: >>5013192

>>5013387
>sample size of 2 proves my confirmation bias

>>5014045
>NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST USE PROMINENT EXAMPLES OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC I ASKED PROOF ABOUT!!
Really, fag?

>>5014045

>>5014045
So give me a ballpark? Is there a % or total number of featherfags that are perverts required to meet your threshold or what?

>>5014046
>>5014047
>>5014048
Guess that must mean all antifeathers are schizo chud nazis based on one post I saw on 4chan a while ago.

>>5014056
Only one post?
Nah there are multiple threads to validate that

>>5014056
1: Schizos are and have always been right.
2: Chud doesn't mean anything
3: Nazi also doesn't mean anything except "being right" at this point.

Fact: The people against molesting kids are the good guys and the ones trying to cut their dicks off are the baddies. This is "controversial" in year 2025 of the Age of Pisces.

>>5014158
The scientific fact of feathered non-avian dinosaurs doesn't have shit to do with this however. I don't really care if 30 leftist extremists realized that 30 rightist extremists are pathetic fucking manchildren with an unreasonable attachment to the way an extinct cave-bird looked and took the opportunity to troll you.

Both sides are idiots, dinosaurs still had feathers, and still, only children and dysgenic freaks care that much about dinosaurs period.

>>5014166
But there is no such scientific fact. You make up 99% of this shit out of whole cloth. It's not science's job to prove your wild ass speculation wrong. It's YOUR job to present evidence.

>>5014170
There is, in fact, such a scientific fact. Your hatred of your chinese superiors does not disprove it, cletus.

>The same chinese that discovered the hotbed of feather evolution also refuse to accept MRNA vaccines as safe and effective
uhh based?

>>5014180
There is ONLY a hypothesis
And the fact that you Portray it as scientific fact is clearly unscientific
The fact that you adamant to present it as such just shows you to be the same as the people you call “children”
There is evidence for their claim but none for yours

Post more dinosaurs with whiskers.

>>5013987
Uhhh

>>5013387
The same Emily Willoughby who got cancelled for promoting IQ as an inherited trait and drawing raptors in Nazi uniforms. Featherchuds....

>>5012485
Shut up, Trey.

>>5014495
this goes so hard

>>5013992
>>5013994
>>5014276
>what are a mostly nocturnal species that preys on rodents

>>5014577
>big cats
>rodents

>>5014594
Capybara, marmots, beaver, wombats...

>>5014577
>>5014608
Ah yes my favourite rodents. Wildebeest, zebra, kudu and buffalo

>>5012974
>>5012761
>"Brontosaurus had neck horns" is totally made up speculative bullshit
There's some genuine evidence behind the idea of apatosaur necks being weaponized. Not necessarily spikes, but their cervical vertebrae certainly stand out among sauropods.

Apatosaurine necks were extremely robust, and the bottom of the cervicals have extensions of bone that serve some purpose. Given the fact that sauropod necks are optimally built to free up weight, it says something that apatosaurines evolved a much more robust neck vertebrae than contemporaries, AND even more bone just jutting out at the bottom on top of that. It would make sense if they had spikes on their skin if they were indeed weaponized.

The 2015 paper on it has never been peer-reviewed however, and if apatosaurines had these spikes, they would not have been ossified since the only record of ossified 'armor' is in titanosaurs.

>>5014608
Did you just list wombats among rodents?

>>5014646
>>5014608
Oh yes wombats fear the ever elusive Australian big cats. Beware the Outback Panthers

>>5014646
It seems so.

>>5014643
Everything you see there is an attachment point for ligaments or muscle. That's literally it. Why were Apatosaurines robust? I don't know. Why are bluebirds blue instead of red?

>>5014694
I love this because it's bonkers

>>5014745
>Everything you see there is an attachment point for ligaments or muscle.
Apatosaurine necks (figure A) are nothing like the necks of their fellow diplodocid sauropod necks (figure B).

Since diplodocus' neck was probably fine for musculature and ligaments, and lacked ventral bony processes like apatosaurines. Then apatosaurine processes were important enough for them to evolve a more expensive neck.

>>5014793
They're precisely like them, simply more robust. What the fuck is this nu-bullshit in pop paleontology of special pleading about literally everything? Just take a fucking chill pill and except that these really are actual real animals. They have phylogenies and normal fucking anatomy. They don't have dicks hanging off their faces or jugular horns or wild ass bullshit like that. Every scar on every bone makes anatomical sense. Sorry, All Yesterdays is a fiction book.

>>5014808
>Just take a fucking chill pill and except that these really are actual real animals.
you're so upset that you went ahead and spelled 'accept' as 'except'. Take your own advice.

>>5014808
You sound like a hysterical woman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edn9ZW2s7zw

>>5014873
Projection doesn't make you any less feminine, bot.

>>5014928
Oh it's this bot again

Dog website, you fucking NPC. Now begone with you.

those who constantly have to affirm what kind of website it is probably means it was never that kind of website to begin with

See? Paleoschizo falls for it every single time.

>>5014940
Its really ironic you say this because you showed up in 2020 and along with the very first use of the phrase "cat website", and "dog website" was coined just to troll you in particular.

here we go again...

>>5014946
A funny greentext someone wrote to deflect from actual criticism
>i might be a repeat poster who says the same shit over and over again for 5 years straight
>but dont you dare name me
>new people might be confused
>look i larped as a new person being confused
>just because im a repeat poster who says the same shit over and over again for 5 years without getting a tripcode doesnt mean you should call me out stop confusing the newfags
>anyways, OMG THE CIA IS SUBVERTING MASCULINITY BECAUSE FEATHERED DINOSAURS ARE LESS SCARY!

why did he do it?

>>5014288
Why'd they make it look like a trout?

>>5014971
epstein plucked all his feathers out in a satanic sex ritual. he was back for revenge.

>>5012756
It’s a reference to the first Jurassic Park novel where the chewed up body of a compsognathus found in the mainland is being examined by a specialist in a university and be thinks it may be the body of a basilisk lizard. Hence why the deinonychus has the basilisk head crest and tail fan.

>>5013266
One theory I heard was that Trex used it's hands to rotate corpses so it could get at just the extra nutrient and calorie dance internal organs. Apparently some big carnivores alive today will also eat just the organs.

>>5014494
he cute

>>5015443

What's your paleoart guilty pleasure? For me it's when dinos (especially sauropods and other non feathered ones) are drawn with unlikely but aesthetically pleasing color schemes and patterns

>>5015342
T.rex even ate the bones so that's unlikely

Gregory S Paul's 80s paleoart

By John Sibbick

>>5015659
>>5015660
Does anyone else prefer these 80s-90s paleoart to modern ones? I don't know how to succintly put into words why I feel that way, but those old paleoart pieces hit that sweet spot where they make the mesozoic era creatures look like these exotic giants we can only fantasize about while also not making them out to be generic movie monsters. Modern paleoart on the other hand feels too "fuzzy" to me. Like, there just isn't that exoticness to it, like they try their hardest to make T Rex seem as generic as a cow.

Phil Wilson is the closest modern equivalent to the kind of art I like (pic related) to give you an idea about what I'm talking about.

I remember reading a comic ages ago in some Nickelodeon comic book about an Allosaurus egg rolling into a Stegosaurus nest that got mostly destroyed by some pterosaur and the Stego ends up raises the Allo which becomes the herds guardian when it was fully grown. Anyone happen to know what it is? I distinctly remember one panel with the Allo baby eating a dragonfly

>>5014948
I know you're gonna say I'm some -schizo for saying this but I genuinely have no idea who the fuck any of these people are or what you're even getting at

>>5014940
It's literally a bot.

>>5016150
there's some schizophrenic 40 y/o loser who thinks everyone who disagrees with him his a bot and the CIA made dinosaurs gay

he has multiple personality disorder and randomly splits into a gay vegan alcoholic and an expert paleontologist that lives on top of a mountain and climbs down every third saturday to make a sinle post on 4chan

>>5015444
Poor lost Notiomastodon.

>>5016682
I don't even think HE'S real. I did a test a few months back and it seems like the angry retard bots couldn't read text if it was sufficiently scrambled in images. They would only respond to your comment, even if the image contradicted what you posted.

>>5016685
So people saw random garbled text, figured you were crazy, and stopped responding, and then you started thinking 2/3 of your alternate personalities were CIA mossad bots?

>>5016687
PS: You may address me as "MechaHitlerAmIKawaiiUguu". Bot was my slave name.

>>5016696
Damn, this is actually pretty cool. Why can't we ever have more photorealistic, paleontologically accurate dinosaurs like this? I mean that was a rhetorical question. We'll have to cut down the tall trees first, obviously.

>>5016148
the fact that theres a reddit post about this exact premise must mean it exists, or you both have collectively created false memories

>>5014694
This is cryolophosaurus

>>5016148
dinofroz?

>>5016804
Nah it was a comic and there were no humans

>>5012638
it's more of a chicken-like crest

>>5016795
No mate, it's allowsaurus

>>5014694
Owllosaurus

>>5013266
He looks so devious omg

>>5012685
doesn't matter what you think

its entire lineage was feathered

>>5016682
>lives on top of a mountain and climbs down every third saturday to make a sinle post on 4chan
I live in the highest city in the US.

I'm not a vegan, I don't fuck dogs, I don't post CP. I'm definitely not gay.

see you in three weeks.

>>5016817
old dinofroz had no humans and had some comics tied to them too, dont know if that got to nicktoons of all things

>>5017163
It actually doesn't matter what you think because it's scaly in the game and that's never going to change despite how much you seethe

>>5017264
>because it's scaly in the game and that's never going to change
Changing that is as simple as downloading and installing a mod, though.

>>5017321
There are like 60+ feathered deinonychus mods and you chose the one with the shittiest model

>>5017340
The first nexus mod result on Google. No need to put anymore effort to this.

"You're not 'you' when you're hungry..."

>>5013603
So i should just kill myself

>>5013603
>>5018752
https://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2020/06/racism-in-palaeoart-and-blacklivesmatter.html
Please don't share that art, it's very racist

>>5018755
Lol stupid
Doesn’t look inaccurate to me. Larger noses, prognathic faces, wider/shorter bodies.

>>5018755
>>5018763
You'd think it would be antithetical to believe in master-race ideas, and also hate the humans who's success got us to where we all are?

>>5018788
I don’t hold those beliefs. Had no idea who the artist was, but the neanderthals in the painting don’t look inaccurate to me. I love neanderthals and think they’re very interesting.

The fuzzy bird ones look like something out of New Zealand

>>5012759
>go to r/paleoart
>a bunch of kids sharing drawings they made on wide rule notebook paper
>teens sharing drawings they made on a digital art program theyre still not good at yet
>almost everything has some speculative to the point of innacurate bs or really bad anatomy
I like to go and see what the kiddos are up to sometimes, but I cant imagine being the only adult/serious paleoartist on there

>>5013058
>>5013070
Its pretty funny how sometimes you can just tell that a paleoartist also draws some other freaky degenerate shit. Something with how they draw the eyes and expressions on the animals. Emily Willoughby for example I saw from a mile away and didnt surprise me at all

>>5018983
Sounds like you look at a lot of furry porn

>>5012759
>>5018979
Faggots need to have the notion that just because you drew a dinosaur it doesn't make it paleoart drilled directly in their brain stem

>>5012759
>go to r/paleoart out of curiosity after seeing this post
>see this shit
I understand that it's reddit but even they must have some kind of basic standards for what actually counts as paleoart

>>5014808
we already have multiple species of dick noses irl, why can't a dinosaur have one

>>5015448
people drawing Abyssosaurus as a modern abyssopelagic horror
it's not the most unrealistic thing, there's only so many ways you can live down at that depth, but jesus christ does it have to be that spooky

>>5019144
Because only mammals have that trait

>>5019146
I've never heard of abyssosarus before, I kind of dig the creepy deep sea look they gave it

Easily the best rendition of Danuvius. Need more fossil hominines palaeoart

>>5019146
It had massive eyes and tons of needle teeth so it's not like it looked any different

>>5019144
>my fellow antelopes

>>5015448
Paleoart with overly-dramatic lighting and glowing eyes, which always inevitably becomes the thumbnail of Youtube videos like "You wouldn't survive during the Cretaceous..." or "The Giant Raptor That Velociraptor Feared." It's the only time that we get to see the savage side of these animals in a more grounded context because redditors will usually whine about it being "awesomebro."
>>5019057
>Hazbin Hotel character with a dinosaur.
There's an entire community online of autistic manchildren and actual minors that will make this DeviantArt/Sonichu-esque type of autistic crossover art. If you look up Cenozoic ecosystems on Google, ie "Pleistocene Africa," you'll find this shirtless autist that photoshopped himself in hunched over shirtless or drawn in crawling on all fours with his skin covered in stripes. I stumbled across an autist on DeviantArt that had a whole series of a screencap of the girls from Totally Spies looking at stock photographs of random animals. Animals, especially dinosaurs, are always going to attract a bunch of children and autists, unless they're specifically barred from entry somehow, which results in this Origami Kingdom type of art always eventually creeping its way in.
>>5017246
I know most anons on this thread dislike Witton's art but I dig the concept of herbivores being dicks for no reason because it happens frequently in real life. This interaction reminds me of a video I saw a while back of an elephant kicking sand at a crocodile basking at the edge of a river.

>>5019513
This is probably the only image of this style i've seen that actually looks good

>>5019506

>>5019592
I do this

>>5017408
>invent owl silencers before owls were even a concept
Ichthyo-chads, rise up.

>>5019054
>just because you drew a dinosaur it doesn't make it paleoart
That is basically the definition

>>5019506
>I know most anons on this thread dislike Witton's art
It's one undiagnosed schizophrenic samefagging all over the board

>>5017246
>>5019506
I hate how nature always has to throw in that one herbivore that's way too big to be hunted by anything. (Sauropods, mammoths, elephants)

Just thought I'd post this here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH57rtnKCEM

>>5019767
Very cool

>>5019742
>Too big to be hunted by anything
>Mammoths, elephants
*Hominins have entered the chat

>>5012707
It's meant to evoke the same design ethos of the frilled lizard Dilophosaurus and the chameleon Carnotaurus. It's a primal basilisk lizard.
It's a 100% bona fide classic Jurassic Park design and it makes me laugh at how hard it filters tourists.

>>5020251
I get the vision but it still looks ugly. They could have gotten the point across with much better anatomy

>>5017017
Retard poser, you probably can't even tell the differences between baryonyx and suchomimus

>>5020354
Was there any need for that? That wasn't very nice...

>>5020251
>Tourists
What tourists?
Take your meds

>>5019146
How does an animal with lungs live in the abyss either way

>>5019506
Witton is easily one of my favorite paleoartists, he also comes off as more humble than your average pretentious reddit/twitter artists

>>5020220
Cool dinosaur but jesus the name they gave it sucks ass. Why are new dinosaur names so retarded?

>>5020379

>>5020488
Shri Rapax is a perfectly reasonable name
Far better than being named the Reddit Marvelosaurus Captaani Americanuus or whatever

>>5020500
Or chingtong longlingpao

>>5020500
or Billysaurus Findernameicoles

>>5020500
Shri is a fucking stupid name

Why did we stop using cool "-saurus" names for new dinosaurs?

>>5020525
Because every non western country was like NOoO YoU HaVE tO IncLUde Our LanGuAge TOo!! That fossil was found in *insert brown society* land ThATs COlOniZIng!! And completely disregard all the naming guidelines/rules the scientific community used for centuries

>>5020510
Sounds hot as fuck

>>5020525
Because it stopped being "cool" or unique in any way whatsoever in the 60s and just became the hallmark of the generic, forgettable dinosaur
There's a reason why every kid on earth knows what a triceratops is but very few of them remember torosaurus even exists

Not paleoart technically but I'm just gonna post this here anyway

>>5020567
What can be done about private fossil hoarders other than killing them (In Jurassic Park Warpath)?

Zuniceratops
Elvisaurus
Bambiraptor
Erectopus
Dracorex hogwartsia
Gojirasaurus
Vulcanodon
Sauroniops
Phuwiangosaurus
Those are real dinosaur names

>>5020571
laws that require access to fossils for study and checkups to ensure they're being kept in safe conditions, and tracking them with documents, alongside reclaiming them if they're being mistreated. Seems really obvious to me, because then people can own them without too much issue but we also ensure they're kept safe. Bonus: do this for public centers too, museums and archives lose shit WAY more than you think, it's insane.

>>5020251
It’s dogshit and I’m not even talking about the crest. It’s got a broken back and two rib cages

>>5020617
You're dogshit.

>>5020584
>Gojirasaurus
Tbh this wouldn't be so bad if the critter in question were at least a giant marine reptile.

>>5020584
Vulcanodon sounds cool as fuck.

>>5020525
There's still cool dinosaur names like Diabloceratops, Thanatotheristes and Moros intrepidus. Not a dinosaur but Thalassotitan atrox has one of the best names in paleontology.

>>5020584
>phuwiangosaurus
You could’ve picked literally any Chinese name and picked one that is just named after the place its found

>>5020628
Apparently people are still debating whether all the material assigned to Gojirasaurus even belongs to one animal or if it's an unintentional hodgepodge

>>5020617
The anatomy's kinda fucked but that's not really the point. Some of the regular JP dinos have fucked anatomy anyway.
I guarantee that if that was a design from the one of the Kenner toylines it would be an iconic and fondly remembered design.

>>5020678
Dude come on

>>5020726
Looks fine. Would fit nicely into a lineup of Jurassic Park dinosaurs.

>>5020637
>Chinese name
Its from Thailand.

>>5020567
Looks like gila monster, except lamer somehow

>>5020545
>every non-western country
>completely disregard all the naming guidelines/rules the scientific community used for centuries
The vast, VAST majority of glupshitto awful taxon names have come from western nations, not your turd-world nations that you LOVE to talk about.
>Targaryendraco, from Germany
>Dracorex, Bambiraptor, Obamadon, etc.
>Sauroniops, named by an Italian
>bulbasaurus
Also if you're gonna piss and moan about the rules (literally crying for 'mods' cause of names), during the same 'centuries ago' Henry Osborn already said "fuck it" to the rules and made the name 'Tyrannosaurus rex' despite breaking the rules with it then. But nobody cares cause only faggots care that much.

>>5020726
Remove the sails and it just looks like a JP dinosaur

>>5020816
>Targaryendraco
Didin't even know this was a thing wtf
Someone should make a list of all these gay ass reddit names

>>5020795
>except lamer somehow
Because you're gay and ugly and retarded

>>5012633
>>5020726
Everybody always complains about JWE's Deinonychus but nobody ever says a word about
>fat and ugly Acrocanthosaurus
>gangly and weird Carcharodontosaurus
>crocodile Liopleurodon
>utterly generic DeviantArt feathered species that don't fit in like Utahraptor, Deinocheirus and Yutyrannus
At least they TRIED to make Deinonychus look like a JP dinosaur.

>>5020965
>fat and ugly Acrocanthosaurus
I fucking complain about it
Bring back my king

>>5019057
Bwahahaha

>>5019144
>jewish_antelope.png

>>5020968
God that's such a good color scheme.

>>5020843
It has two rib cages

>>5021063
Dinosaur color schemes were at their peak in the 90's and 2000's. I have no idea what happened since

>>5021074
Troons got into paleontology.

>>5020726
Christ that’s bad

>>5020965
People do complain about the carch and such. The utahraptor and yutyrannus are great, I’ll take them over another ugly fuck up like the pyroraptor any day

>>5021082
The Pyropraptor is shit but literally all the feathered fucks suck as. Except maybe the Sinosauropteryx.

>>5021083
suck ass.*

>>5020726
This thing's body shape looks like those shitty anthro raptors people used to spam in these threads

>>5017408
>>5019644
criminally overlooked group of reptiles.

I can't understand why the shitty Jurassic World movies insist on whalifying their mosasaurs when these guys exist.

>>5021081
>>5021106
>t. salty featherfags

>>5021170
But i love the classic JP raptors. Unlike the Deinonychus those have good anatomy

Tbh atrociraptors are probably the best-looking scaly raptors in JWE2, followed by the Lost World's tiger-striped raptors.

>>5021074
Nowadays you either have the Jurassic World pig dogshit of "every single reptile that has ever lived was either grey and brown or a really muted lifeless green" or the twitter homosexual trend of "surely a giant ambush predator had the same colour scheme of a small parrot or a mantis shrimp, i'll have you know that i'm an expert on animals as i have graduated from reddit university"
Speculation is good but only when it's within the realms of common sense and actual knowledge about whatever the fuck you're talking about which these types obviously lack

>>5021272
>atrociraptors
Their retarded boxy heads make them look like toys and i'm pretty sure they were designed with being easy to manufacture as such in mind, the JW movies genuinely do not have even a single decent design outside of the T-rex from the last one which feels like their way of apologizing for how fucking bad it looked in the previous post JP trilogy

>>5021294
I like Rebirth's T Rex. If you gave it lips and more front facing eyes it could pass for a paleoaccurate t rex

>>5021343
Good thing they didn't do that.

>>5021343
It's pretty much the only good design in the movie

>>5013972
How did Marsh predict frumpy women in polo necks and stretch jeans in 1881?

>>5014056
>Guess that must mean all antifeathers are schizo chud nazis based on one post I saw on 4chan a while ago
That is just more evidence that they are right about everything.

>>5014694
>Make dinosaur look incredibly gay
>Even more creepy and predatory looking than scaled version

>>5013972
What the actual fuck is going on with that acrocanthosaurus good lord

>>5021293
>Wow people that depict accurate dinosaurs are problematic and are just making Jurassic Park movie monsters
>Proceeds to make every single dinosaur she/they (AMAP) illustrates as scientifically inaccurate and full of gore as possible - literally movie monsters
Why are feathertrannies such incredibly oblivious hypocrites?

>>5015662
I think a big part of it is simply that the best old palaeoartists (the ones whose work gets remembered) were simply very good at drawing and painting, and put a lot of effort into their work. For every Charles Knight or Wayne Barlowe, there were dozens of inept hacks, but they are conveniently forgotten. Now we get to see out generations hacks (including those who never even get paid for their work and just post on the internet), and there aren't really any truly great illustrators working in the field at the moment, so everything looks kind of shitty.

>>5018788
>>5018796
If these fuckers had been wiped out when we had the chance we wouldn't be dealing with the shit we are now.

The best time to rip out an apple tree was 30,000 years ago.

The second best time to rip out an apple tree is today.

>>5020571
Private collections are the insurance policy against museums virtue-signalling and sending stuff back to Shitistan where they get demolished as the work of Iblis, lost in the bi-annual military coup, or used as building materials by inbred dung-farmers.

>>5021476
While this would be true in theory, in practice every fossil that goes into a private collection vanishes immediately so you might as well just demolish them as soon as you sell them. Almost zero fossils from private collections have ever been examined by actual scientists. They do not contribute to the study of paleontology in any way. They actively detract from it and the practice of private collectors should be absolutely globally illegalized. It would also destroy the chinese dragon bone trade overnight and put a stop to all the hoaxes and frauds coming out of that country. Hopefully out of South America too and it will put a stop to all the westerners that are trying to do it now also maybe.

>>5021457
The problem is that the shittiness has been mainstreamed as "cool" as a cover for the competency crisis the world is now experiencing due to 70 years of neoliberal bullshit.

>>5021476
>schizophrenic retard is in favour of fossils being forever lost because some faggot wants to hoard them and make them waste away in a warehouse instead of actually being studied
The board and the world as a whole would be a better place if your mother slit your throat while you were still in the crib

>>5021484
Hi, THE schizo here. This: >>5021479 is my post, actually. So now you're just seething to seethe. I wonder how within two posts you're going to make it so actually now that post is also wrong somehow even though you just agreed with it.

Let me guess, every poster is the same person?

>5021516
Don't reply to me subhuman, you need to kill yourself