>>5014652 (OP) >5 out of the top 7 are because they carry a pathogen that kills people
Lame, people are still on top and total more than the entire rest of the list combined without a pathogen.
>>5014652 (OP) >Number of people killed per year
1000 by crocodile?
500 by hippo?
100 by elephant?
100 by lion?
10 by wolf?
10 by Shark?
Yeah gonna press X on that one
>>5014693 >If the graphic only excluded the majority of the world (53%).
lmao
But yes, I'd be curious to see the numbers of animals that directly kill people.
>>5014880
The "majority of the world" stands out for having a hard genetic limit on their intelligence that makes them rough peers with orangutans. They can not maintain a cohesive enough society to control basic shit like stray dogs and cats or put their thoughts together and realize the existential threat of mosquitoes is greater than that of some bird going extinct and pissing off 30 white people.
This is in line with 50% of any western country being 50% below average. Less than 20% of humanity is actually intelligent.
>>5014892
birds going extinct can fuck people up. areas that lost vultures because of ddt have problems with rabies because of the dogs attracted by the animal corpses laying around because theres no vultures to eat them. but of course thats only a thirdie problem
>>5015033
India lost their vultures because of giving cows painkillers, not DDT. So it's actually even more retarded than you think.
There are also way better ways to kill mosquitos so the resulting extinctions are small animal starvation instead, ie: something only 30 white people would consider actionable.
>>5014652 (OP)
Yes and I donate to the against malaria foundation.
Others who can afford to do so and choose not to are scumbags who are worse than child molesters