>>5033249
Nope. No. No more of this bullshit. All claims of Dinosaur endothermy are based on anatomical ignorance, wild ass speculation and totally made up bullshit. There is ZERO evidence in the fossil record to suggest that these REPTILES were warm-blooded. And the only surviving "archosaurs" today are crocodilians which are ectotherms and birds, which may not even descend from dinosaurs at all. All studies which have attempted to prove that Dinosaurs were endotherms have failed monumentally. The only ones that even give "strong suggestion" that Dinosaurs were warmblooded are isotopic analysis studies, which is nothing more than pseudoscience for anything but radiometric dating. Isotopic analysis is well-known to be extremely unreliable in everything from dietary to temperature studies. It's constantly used because it's useful for turning journals into pulp fiction paper mills.
Growth rates and curves REFUTE Dinosaur endothermy if anything and everyone pushing them as proof of it either lies (like Horner did when he claimed an animal that was at least 4 years old had "false LAGs" and actually was only 1-2) or has soundly refuted their own hypothesis. A growth study on Archaeopteryx gave ECTOTHERMIC values. This is fucking Archaeopteryx. One of the only truly feathered non-bird fossils (that isn't a chinese hoax) and even it tested as an ectotherm. Not even a Sauropod or something. A study DIRECTLY COUNTING THE DAYS of age in eggs of Protoceratops and Hypacrosaurus showed reptilian values (Hypacrosaurus eggs took most of a year to develop (I've even added Ostriches and Emus to the chart)), VERY much not like endotherms (
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1613716114). No, sorry, Dinosaurs were cold-blooded. No amount of jewish or tranny cope or seethe will change any of that. The fossil record is VERY clear about this. And only pseudoscience witchcraft says otherwise.
Notice how the jewbot never references actual studies? Its only tool is pilpul.
