Anonymous
6/12/2025, 3:08:11 AM
No.935669550
[Report]
>>935669551
>>935669553
>>935669554
>>935669556
>>935669559
>>935669563
>>935669565
>>935669582
>>935669813
>>935669862
>>935669863
>So what do you do in your free time, Anon? Any hobbies?
I post on 4chan sometimes.
>Oh… okay. What board?
Mostly /g/ and sometimes /x/ or /lit/.
>So like, tech and scary stories?
Well, not just that. I like the discourse.
>Discourse?
Yeah, I mean… it’s one of the last bastions of true free speech.
>So like, memes and stuff?
No— I mean, sure, sometimes. But it’s deeper than that.
>How so?
Well, you can find real redpills if you know where to look.
>What do you mean, "redpills"?
Like truths society doesn’t want you to know.
>Such as?
Did you know IQ is actually the best predictor of success, and most women are biologically wired to hypergamy?
>Oh.
It’s all backed by data, if you dig deep enough.
>So you spend your time reading unhinged schizophrenic posts on a site designed to keep you addicted to ragebait, convincing yourself you're part of some intellectual vanguard because you memorized buzzwords from someone named 'BasedAnon420'?
>You don’t get it. It’s a community.
You're a faceless NEET yelling into a void with other faceless NEETs. You’re in a permanent adolescence loop.
That’s not fair. Some people on there are really smart.
>Yeah? And what have they accomplished?
Well, there's greentexts… and archives of knowledge...
>You just described a Tumblr blog run by a fascist.
[silence]
>Like sorry, but you’re not edgy or enlightened. You’re terminally online. You’ve mistaken paranoia for intelligence.
[silence]
>I think it’s sad you think reading conspiracy rants and telling 16-year-olds that women only want "Chads" is your idea of enlightenment.
You’re twisting my words.
>No, I’m just pointing out that you’ve confused emotional immaturity for philosophical insight.
Go outside. Touch grass. Read a book that isn’t written by a YouTuber or a 2009 /pol/ tripfag.
[silence]
I post on 4chan sometimes.
>Oh… okay. What board?
Mostly /g/ and sometimes /x/ or /lit/.
>So like, tech and scary stories?
Well, not just that. I like the discourse.
>Discourse?
Yeah, I mean… it’s one of the last bastions of true free speech.
>So like, memes and stuff?
No— I mean, sure, sometimes. But it’s deeper than that.
>How so?
Well, you can find real redpills if you know where to look.
>What do you mean, "redpills"?
Like truths society doesn’t want you to know.
>Such as?
Did you know IQ is actually the best predictor of success, and most women are biologically wired to hypergamy?
>Oh.
It’s all backed by data, if you dig deep enough.
>So you spend your time reading unhinged schizophrenic posts on a site designed to keep you addicted to ragebait, convincing yourself you're part of some intellectual vanguard because you memorized buzzwords from someone named 'BasedAnon420'?
>You don’t get it. It’s a community.
You're a faceless NEET yelling into a void with other faceless NEETs. You’re in a permanent adolescence loop.
That’s not fair. Some people on there are really smart.
>Yeah? And what have they accomplished?
Well, there's greentexts… and archives of knowledge...
>You just described a Tumblr blog run by a fascist.
[silence]
>Like sorry, but you’re not edgy or enlightened. You’re terminally online. You’ve mistaken paranoia for intelligence.
[silence]
>I think it’s sad you think reading conspiracy rants and telling 16-year-olds that women only want "Chads" is your idea of enlightenment.
You’re twisting my words.
>No, I’m just pointing out that you’ve confused emotional immaturity for philosophical insight.
Go outside. Touch grass. Read a book that isn’t written by a YouTuber or a 2009 /pol/ tripfag.
[silence]
