>>936342427
I just want to call you a jew and walk away, but that wouldn't be the Christian thing to do. I guess I'll just keep poking holes in your falsehoods.
So we're not beholden to Mosaic law, but will still be punished if we murder someone? We're not required to keep the Sabbath, but bad tidings will still befall us if we fail to keep the Sabbath? And the real question at the crux of this whole argument -how the argument began - God did create man and woman in His own image, but somehow God's image has changed and now the lines between man and woman are blurred and the two are interchangeable at man's will? Was the fact that we are all made in God's image also voided with the New Covenant?
Please don't deflecting again with the falsehood that "everything changed at the resurrection and now all the old prohibitions are permissible now because Paul said so in this really questionable translation". And please don't think that I didn't take note of the fact that when I asked you to name your source, you threw out numerous sources and told me to take my pick, but never nailed yourself down to your actual source (which is really Google AI, but that'sneither here nor there). Only a troglodyte would fall for the implication you tried to make there. By throwing out numerous different versions, you implied that all versions say the same thing, when in fact, your Scofield's and New International Version Bibles, the most commonly denounced versions of the Bible, are also the most commonly referenced versions by sources like Google, CNN, MSNBC, FOX, Joel Osteen, Kenneth Copeland, and random Christians like you, all say the same thing. You coukd have at least claimed you read from the King James Version. I would at least assumed you were trying to be genuine, if only misguided
