>>937203534
>>937203488
Double replying is insane work lol. You really are triggered.
>could be they no longer look good
Go and see if you can find a timestamp, I'm sure you can little chuddy. We've seen recent pics of them, they look fine.
>could be they didn't want to scare off simps
They arguably got more simps
>could be a way they could have made it so focus was on them and they recieved more attention and mentions
They could've mentioned it off rip and still recieved those "mentions", this is a null point.
>marketing
It's free porn, you gimp.