>>937203534>>937203488Double replying is insane work lol. You really are triggered.
>could be they no longer look goodGo and see if you can find a timestamp, I'm sure you can little chuddy. We've seen recent pics of them, they look fine.
>could be they didn't want to scare off simpsThey arguably got more simps
>could be a way they could have made it so focus was on them and they recieved more attention and mentionsThey could've mentioned it off rip and still recieved those "mentions", this is a null point.
>marketingIt's free porn, you gimp.