>>937995124
A friend actually pitched a similar question to me at one point.
It was "If there were no consequences whatsoever, would you rape a child". I of course said no on instinct, but then thought about it for a moment.
There's two ways to take "no consequences" in this context. Either there's just no consequences to me, and the victim still has to hold that experience forever. In which case the answer stays no.
If it's no negative consequences all around, and the "victim" is just an artificial person who only exists while the act is happening, then I have to consider the possibilities.
Either I don't like it, and I'd prefer not going through that, or I do like it, and I spend the rest of my life thinking about it. There'd always be that thought in the back of my mind, and a temptation. For all I know, child pussy could be like ultra-meth without the health detriments, and that's why everyone with enough money gravitates to it like bees to honey.
The answer would be no on all accounts is what I'm saying. But I went through the mental legwork to come to that conclusion instead of just going "wrong 'cause illegal"
