>>938091851
>Neurology, endocrinology, and psychology all recognize trans people.
orly?
You offer no citations in support of this assertion, so let's have a quick look.
1. Neurology
>The biological basis of gender identity cannot be modelled in animals and is best studied in people who identify with a gender that is different from the sex of their genitals, in particular transsexual people.
>Genes. Evidence of a genetic contribution to transsexuality is very limited. There are few reports of family and twin studies of transsexuals but none offer clear support for the involvement of genetic factors
>Hormones. The evidence that prenatal hormones affect the development of gender identity is stronger but far from proven.
(all from ncbi nih (dot) article PMC6677266/)
2. Endocrinology
All of the endocrinology evidence I could find talks about treating the person so that they could deny the natural endocrine output of their body and over-ride it so that they then developed superficial characteristics of the opposite sex. I could find no evidence that, by testing for endocrine secretions before intervention, a trans person could be identified. From an endocrine view, their results matched those of someone of the same natal sex. Saying that endocrinologists "recognise" trans-sexuality is borderline dishonest.
3. Psychology. Now here we agree. Anyone who thinks they are a different sex or gender from the manifest evidence of their body clearly has psychological issues.
>Beginning as early as childhood, a transgender person may have feelings of disconnection between their primary and secondary sex traits and designated gender and the gender with which they identify. People who experience intense, persistent gender incongruence, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), may receive a diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
psychologytoday
>citations deleted because of retarded spam filters