>>21448825Again, it's my old stone that I don't even have anymore, and yes they were the same thickness, but for some reason the material on the 400 side was much more resilient. The 1k side was what was eventually gone, while maybe half of the 400 side was used up.
>so you end up having to buy a flattening device anywayI just rubbed it on the asphalt on the street to flatten, worked fine since it's such a soft material to begin with and the losses from that don't really matter with such a cheap stone to begin with.
>and you might as well have gotten two good stones from the startAnon, for 13€ (at the time) I got a stone that lasted me multiple years, that's just a value proposition that an expensive stone can't beat. Also I didn't know yet if I'd use it much (I have relatives who also got stones after seeing mine and they barely can be arsed to use them).
Again, it's like some dude saying he wants to go for a hike and you convincing him to get a boutique ultralight gear setup. Sure it'll be better and last longer, but it's probably not appropriate for a beginner.