← Home ← Back to /ck/

Thread 21563151

131 posts 52 images /ck/
Anonymous No.21563151 >>21563191 >>21563586 >>21564100 >>21564113 >>21564326 >>21564355 >>21564401 >>21564440 >>21564654 >>21564662 >>21564696 >>21564789 >>21564791
You literally can't argue with, disprove, or deny any of this:
You literally can't argue with, disprove, or deny any of this:
Anonymous No.21563152 >>21563172 >>21563176 >>21565271
Anything other than 85%+ dark chocolate is for little fat children.
Anonymous No.21563153 >>21563164 >>21563165
Are you an expert on brown things?
Anonymous No.21563164
>>21563153
White and pink/red (branded as "ruby") chocolate kinds exist too, nefag-kun.
Anonymous No.21563165 >>21563171 >>21563178
>>21563153
Nah, that'd be your mom.
Anonymous No.21563171
>>21563165
KEK. bodied that freak!
Anonymous No.21563172 >>21565190 >>21565304
>>21563152
Ironically enough, Lindt's 85% and 99% are actually genuinely WORSE than their standard 75% one.
Anonymous No.21563176
>>21563152
Go try telling that to GuyLian, see how that goes.
Anonymous No.21563178 >>21563180
>>21563165
my mom eats brown things for breakfast
Anonymous No.21563180
>>21563178
...anon...you...
Anonymous No.21563191 >>21563216
>>21563151 (OP)
I aint readin' all that, retard.
Good for you, or sorry it happened.
Anonymous No.21563216
>>21563191
You clearly did.
Anonymous No.21563263 >>21563298 >>21563303
What kind of chocolate does BElarus have?
Anonymous No.21563298 >>21564113 >>21564327 >>21564333 >>21565230
>>21563263
Belarus very strictly adheres to the classical genuine USSR period's recipes, it is a literal time machine taste and packaging-wise, though some domestic brands try to modernize approach to packaging while retaining the production and recipe formula quality. USSR had insanely high tier chocolate sourcing (due to being in direct friendship and partnership with many African and other cocoa-producing countries), manufacturing, and package design artistry in it's heyday times (absolute best chocolate in the country was made in the 1955's ~ 1988's time frame window, so 33 years of absolute GODLIKE excellence in every field imaginable, nearing Swiss and Belgian and sometimes even BEATING them outright at several World Fares events). Belarus' production is not *exactly* this level, since some of the production tech and recipes from USSR days were lost and couldn't be replicated or found still to these days, but they're still extremely close to "THAT legendary Soviet choco" nonetheless. If Belarus were to ever find the rest of USSR's recipes or to fully restore the entire technological process with all of the intricacies and specialties of USSR's manufacturing processes, I personally have no doubts they'd immediately ascend to β„–2 spot in the OP tier listings, if not equaling or beating Belgium outright. THAT is how AWESOME and AUTHENTIC chocolate production was in USSR.
Anonymous No.21563303
>>21563263
Anonymous No.21563586 >>21564321
>>21563151 (OP)
>belarussian chocolate
lmao
Anonymous No.21564100 >>21564321
>>21563151 (OP)
Swiss chocolate is pretty good, haven't had Belgian chocolate though
I've heard Russian chocolate is also very good but literally no over outside Russia sells them or has tasted any
Anonymous No.21564113 >>21564340 >>21565218
>>21563151 (OP)
>>21563298
So is this any good? I think its the only russian chocolate ive ever seen.
Anonymous No.21564137 >>21564347
Dubai #1
Anonymous No.21564321
>>21563586
>t. uneducated dumbass that doesn't know jack shit

>>21564100
You can usually semi-easily find several Russian chocolate brands in Russian diaspora spots in yurop and on the American continent. Such as Brighton Beach in Jew Yolk, or pretty much picrel (and you can bet your ass you can easily find some Russian-native stores in Alaska):
Anonymous No.21564325 >>21564347
>no dubai chocolate at the top of the list
Clearly you know nothing
Anonymous No.21564326 >>21564347
>>21563151 (OP)
>Africa
Treating Africa as a single country.
Thinking all chocolate from Africa must be good.

Retarded list made by a retarded redditor.
Anonymous No.21564327
>>21563298
Nobody cares you pussy ass bitch
Anonymous No.21564333 >>21564385
>>21563298
This sounds like overhyped bs.
Then again so is Swiss chocolate.
Anonymous No.21564340 >>21564343 >>21564414 >>21564928
>>21564113
It's a very classical traditional brand from USSR days, but recipe has changed quite a bit since then, so even though manufacturing process is mostly same, the taste is not. It's still very good, but it's just not equal to how it was during the best days of USSR's chocolate production.

In local native Russians' opinions, current day domestically produced "Alyonka" is roughly "7~8/10". As mentioned before, Belarus very strictly adheres to classical authentic USSR's recipes and manufacturing ways, so their own domestic variation of "Alyonka", called "Alesya" (different girl name and different girl), is basically "USSR's times Alyonka" taste and chocolate bar print form-wise:
Anonymous No.21564343 >>21564366 >>21565218
>>21564340
Ok but was it better or worse in the olden times
Anonymous No.21564347 >>21564354
>>21564137
>>21564325
That's just German/Swiss choco, retards. Because so-called "Dubai manufacturing" is literally just imported chocolatiers from Germany and Switzerland, who work there as hired monkeys.

>>21564326
Africa grows it's own cocoa natively and these plants are everywhere in the sub-Saharan part of the country, dumbass. Borders largely don't mean much, though most prominent cocoa producer and chocolate manufacturer is Cote d'Ivoire.
Anonymous No.21564354 >>21564370
>>21564347
>Africa grows it's own cocoa natively and these plants are everywhere in the sub-Saharan part of the country, dumbass. Borders largely don't mean much, though most prominent cocoa producer and chocolate manufacturer is Cote d'Ivoire.
Exporting cocoa is not the same as exporting chocolate. I'm sure there's plenty of good chocolate from Africa but blanket-assuming any chocolate from an entire continent must be good is retarded redditor logic.
Anonymous No.21564355
>>21563151 (OP)
Didn't read lol
Suck my penis
Anonymous No.21564364
Anonymous No.21564366
>>21564343
As compared to what? Domestic classic USSR chocolate? Obviously it's slightly worse, since many recipes and manufacturing tech know-how specialties were lost after USSR's implosion. Read what was said earlier. If USSR's "Alyonka" was straight up just unironic "10/10", chocolate that was winning grand prizes and 1st places at many World Fares and global chocolatier competitions all around the planet, modern day Russia's Alyonka is a 7~8/10 in local native Russians' own opinions and eyes, and that's AFTER the restoration and rejuvenation of the country after the "1994's ~ mid-2000's Criminal Russia" period of impoverishment, ruination and dilapidation. It was WAAAY worse in the 90's (I'd say a "5 out of 10" at best case scenario).

For any foreigner or tourist who's "not in-the-know", however, who's not used to completely natural chocolate manufacturing, even modern Alyonka would look and taste like "absolute GOD TIER 9001/10 choco", especially to Burgerlardistan's and Cucknada's creaturas, who got used to consume butyric acid-filled vomit-tasting """""(((chocolate)))""""" fodder sloppa even cattle and other animals don't eat.
Anonymous No.21564370 >>21564400
>>21564354
It's good in Cote d'Ivoire, good in Nairobi, good in Kenya, good in Lesotho, good in South Africa. I don't know what else to tell you, as I base this out of my own personal experience of visiting those places and buying their local choco brands there.
Anonymous No.21564385 >>21564400
>>21564333
There are a ton of "Americans try European and Russian chocolate" videos on YT and nearly all of them express genuine shock and befuddlement on how good Russian chocolate is. For fuck's sake, you don't even have to lurk for long. And Belarus chocolate is even better.
Anonymous No.21564400 >>21564412
>>21564385
Obviously all of those are better than American puke chocolate. But gourmet chocolate is gourment chocolate the world all over.

I'm doubting there is an inherent quality that makes Swiss chocolate so superior to, say, French. You are getting charged for the country of origin aspect (and you are probably gaslighting yourself that it's worth it and that such a difference exists).

>>21564370
Fair enough, I haven't been to Africa so I can't comment. I've had South African chocolate and it was very good.
Anonymous No.21564401 >>21564412
>>21563151 (OP)
I can 'literally' argue with how lame this thread is and your stupid chocolate rankings are.
Anonymous No.21564412 >>21564431 >>21564450
>>21564400
>I'm doubting there is an inherent quality that makes Swiss chocolate so superior to, say, French
French chocolatiers specialize particularly on milk chocolate making and they always stuff a fuckton of vanilla in there, so it's always either way too sweet or way too diluted. They never never do dark or bitter chocolate, because they're fucking pussies as a nation.

They also overprice heavily per sheer weight of product you're getting, and their domestic brands are full of smelling-own-farts-from-wine-glass poseur hubris and arrogance, such as aggressive advertisement campaigns in which these retards dare to claim theirs' choco is better than Belgian. The OP's rating list is not just about how it tastes or looks, but manufacturers and brands are being judged by all other aspects as well.

>>21564401
Cope and dilate, muttranny faggot. After what happened yesterday, you're going to disappear soon.
Anonymous No.21564414 >>21564427
>>21564340
Thanks. Ive seen it in the store multiple times but i didnt know if their export stuff was any good, and i didnt think it was expensive (?), so i never bought it. I will try it the next time i see it.
What about this stuff from japan? Any good?
Anonymous No.21564427
>>21564414
Japan doesn't have domestic cocoa production, for obvious reasons, so 100% of all their cocoa is imported, which directly affects prices and availability drastically. As for manufacturing and packaging, however, they're nearly at the level that sits somewhere in-between Swiss and French.

Their main "issues" that put them so lower on the ranking in the OP pic, are extremely small portions (if you think "shrinkflation" in yurop is "bad", you clearly never been to Zippangu), exorbitantly high prices per weight of end product, scarcity of brands and inane advertisement campaigns rife with typical Japanese clownery that has nothing to do with how the actual product is. When you've finally got and eating one, however, it's FUCKING REAL GOOD.
Anonymous No.21564431 >>21564448 >>21564519
>>21564412
Like I said, at the highest level of chocolate making, you should be judging individual brands rather than making these blanket generalizations, because there is nothing inherent in the geography of a country that forbids good chocolate-making. It's not like wine, where the soil affects the taste and quality of the varietals.

Many breakout top brands are from places like Norway, Ecuador, the Philippines, Brazil, or Canada which you wouldn't expect.

The whole OP list reeks of reddit midwittery.
Anonymous No.21564433 >>21564451
Oh, and also - Japan doesn't use raw sugars in any forms. Ever. Period.
100% of all their chocolate is sweetened with stevia extracts or topinambur syrups. They also don't use any animal milk and fats other than goat, because Japanese, just as Chinese and several other Asian ethnic groups, is predominantly lactose-intolerant.
Anonymous No.21564440 >>21564457
>>21563151 (OP)
>WELCOME TO WORLD CHOCOLATE DEATHMATCH
Anonymous No.21564448 >>21564452
>>21564431
Cucknada doesn't have good chocolatiers and all of it's cocoa is imported, and they largely try to trace or replicate US-of-A, sans vomit, unless you're a "Quebecois French Cucknadian" retard, at which point it'd be more akin to typical French stuff. The "best" chocolate in Cucknada is made in Alberta, which is as far from "French Cucknadian" faggotry as possible. But even that "best" chocolate is still maybe 10 or 11 spot on the OP list. You can't judge entire country's production by just a single individual brand, indeed, so the OP rating is encompassing the overall production of the country, it is an average temperature, the "vertical slice", not minimal or maximal.
Anonymous No.21564450
>>21564412
>their domestic brands are full of smelling-own-farts-from-wine-glass poseur hubris and arrogance
Your posts reek of the exact same but with the added ignorance of judging chocolates simply by their national origin and not on the producer themselves. The fact that OP pic doesn't list a single individual producer outs it as useless garbage.
Anonymous No.21564451 >>21564457
>>21564433
What? Id have to ask for sauce for that.
Anonymous No.21564452 >>21564466
>>21564448
>You can't judge entire country's production by just a single individual brand, indeed, so the OP rating is encompassing the overall production of the country
So why not just list the individual brands that are good instead of a broad, ultimately useless list?
Anonymous No.21564457
>>21564440
USSR would've been on top of the ladder, getting the Money In The Bank case, if it were still to exist today. Think about that. Not Belgium, not Germany, not Switzerland. But USSR. That's how GOOD and FLAWLESS the USSR's people were having it, back in the days.

>>21564451
Goat milk is goat milk, anon. It's whole goat milk.
Anonymous No.21564458
Youre right because i cant read it
Anonymous No.21564466 >>21564475
>>21564452
>why not just list the individual brands
Because many countries have a fuckton of them. It'd take hours to try to list down everything. Russia alone, for example, has at least 30 different well known big brands, with a fuckton more less known or "craft" brands existing on the market besides that. Jamaica, for example, has no less than 10 in on by itself, and it's a fucking Caribbean island system. As OP pic clearly mentioned in the first sentence, the OP pic's ratings are based on that person's individual personal experience of getting those countries' chocolate and personally eating it, so the rating can only go so far as far he managed to get with brand coverage, since some regions have internal exclusive production that could be completely unheard of or unavailable in others. It's like Checkers & Rally's, or White Castle VS Krystal.
Anonymous No.21564475
>>21564466
>Because many countries have a fuckton of them. It'd take hours to try to list down everything.
So just list a few standouts for each country. That does not take "hours" if you actually know what you're talking about, it takes minutes. Then your "list" actually has some actual use. Nobody gives a shit what you think in broad strokes are the best chocolate countries hollistically, nobody is ordering the "general french chocolate box", you order from actual providers. Did that need to be spelled out for you?
Anonymous No.21564519 >>21564531 >>21564534 >>21564536
>>21564431
>adding fruits/berries to increase weight in attempt to upsell
Instantly into the trash.
Anonymous No.21564531 >>21564617
>>21564519
You are the antithesis of intelligent.
Anonymous No.21564534 >>21564620
>>21564519
When it comes to bougie craft chocolates, people are paying for it either way, so that stuff gets added because the makers think it's better/are high off their own farts.
Anonymous No.21564536
>>21564519
Have (You) tried it?
Anonymous No.21564617 >>21564639
>>21564531
Read the package, retard. Any "fillings" mean less pure chocolate mass. It's same shit as "cooling" cocktails and other drinks with "ice cubes", which is literally just diluting shit and selling less actual product while increasing or retaining same price. It is factually a scam.
Anonymous No.21564620
>>21564534
Literally the only chocolate that was ever worth it's damn when it comes down to filling it with nuts, fruits, berries, or other fillings, is Ritter Sport. Because those guys genuinely put authentic whole nuts in there and do fillings properly. Everything else is a literal Ponzi scheme and fleecing.
Anonymous No.21564639 >>21564647
>>21564617
Read the package, retard.
I repeat myself because, due to your condition, you learn things through repetition, (You) are the antithesis of intelligent.
Anonymous No.21564647 >>21564652
>>21564639
Ah, so you're just amoeba IQ imbecile, got it. Should've said so right away.
Anonymous No.21564652
>>21564647
>n-no u
Read. The. Package. Retard.
I repeat myself because, due to your condition, you learn things through repetition, (You) are the antithesis of intelligent.
Anonymous No.21564654
>>21563151 (OP)
I have zero knowledge on the topic so I literally can't argue with this.
Anonymous No.21564661 >>21564675
What chocolate does Poland have that puts it in the top 10?
Anonymous No.21564662 >>21564687 >>21564775
>>21563151 (OP)
>packaging design
Opinion instantly disregarded.
Do you eat the packaging too? Faggot
Anonymous No.21564675 >>21564681
>>21564661
Poland has actually surprisingly good domestic chocolate manufacturing, which is probably due to majority of factory and production infrastructure being built for them by USSR after USSR liberated Poland during WW II and was strongly subsidizing and giving many gibs to Poland for decades, offering them to become full SSR with all of the privileges, but they denied/refused USSR's generous and genuine offerings thrice in a row. Roughly 80% of all current-day's Poland's infrastructure is USSR-built factories, warehouses, production lines. They obviously unable to make chocolate as good as what Belarus is capable to produce, since Poland never had original USSR's recipes/formulas on their hands, but they're still quite good nonetheless due to the available infrastructure alone. Their packaging design choices are usually quite dubious and questionable, however. Their chocolate is usually quite cheap, on the other hand, so that offsets lacking in other fields.
Anonymous No.21564681 >>21564691
>>21564675
Thanks chatgpt but name two brands.
Anonymous No.21564687 >>21564695
>>21564662
It's like a whole new subset of autism that I didn't know even existed.
Anonymous No.21564691 >>21564698
>>21564681
I'm a living human being, you retard.
As for "famous" or "well known" domestic Polish chocolate/confectionery brands, look up E. Wedel (this is basically direct equivalent of Finnish "Karl Fazer") and Wawel, first and foremost.
Anonymous No.21564695 >>21564710
,>>21564687
>new
It's The Fox & the Grapes
Anonymous No.21564696 >>21564721 >>21564859 >>21565285
>>21563151 (OP)
>none of the top chocolate countries are from where chocolate comes from
grim
Anonymous No.21564698 >>21564710 >>21564726
>>21564691
Those are barely just okay, if 90% of the world has chocolate worse than that then I don't know how it became popular in the first place.
Anonymous No.21564710
>>21564695
Being obsessed with food packaging has nothing to do with the Fox & the Grapes story, it's just retarded.

>>21564698
It's a list made by a reddit midwit, I wouldn't put much stock in it
Anonymous No.21564721 >>21564772 >>21564773 >>21564780
>>21564696
>countries where chocolate comes from
Cocoa plant originated in southern part of American continent, but nowadays the largest and most prominent grower and producer of cocoa beans on the planet is African continent, specifically so Cote d'Ivoire that was mentioned earlier ITT.

The plant originated on American continent, this is true, but that original plant produced beans of way lesser quality and tasting experience than the modern grown one, as climate of Africa was proven to be the best and most suitable for the plant, resulting in way better quality of beans and taste of end product. It is what it is.

Oranges (and mandarines/tangerines), for example, originated from China, and yet native domestic Chinese oranges suck ass, due to intricacies of soil and weather. The latin and Russian word "apelsin", for example, is a translit of "appelsina", which literally means "apple from China", since orange is FACTUALLY an apple-lemon hybrid, that was created purely by accident. Fun fact: oranges did NOT exist in the wild initially, they are purely accidental hybrid that was created by humans in gardens, it has no wild nature progenitor/ancestor.

Besides, Mexico, Chile, and Brazil are all in the OP's list, and all of those are technically descendants of native south Americans who prepared and used chocolate for ceremonial purposes. So, hey.
Anonymous No.21564726 >>21564732
>>21564698
>Those are barely just okay
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
Wawel can be hit and miss quite a bit, but E. Wadel's choco almost never disappoints, aside from mediocre quality of packaging.
Anonymous No.21564732 >>21564744 >>21564775
>>21564726
>aside from mediocre quality of packaging
Does this actually factor into your rankings?
Anonymous No.21564744 >>21565187
>>21564732
Can't you read?
If packaging is shit (rips apart badly, doesn't protect product well or doesn't have additional wrapping for extra protection, doesn't open easily, has fugly or bad designs that make it stand out less in a sea of other offerings from other brands/manufacturers), it's obviously going to affect the score, because overall buying, using, and eating experience is rated, not just the product itself as food. Would you have bought a box of GuyLian, very expensive Belgian chocolate, if not for that legendary color and design of the package? Especially since the "GuyLian" phrase itself sounds like some rando chinkshit to people who don't know anything about the brand's history or are too ignorant/uneducated about where that name comes from.
Anonymous No.21564755
Anonymous No.21564772 >>21564775 >>21564819
>>21564721
>, since orange is FACTUALLY an apple-lemon hybrid
stopped reading here. you had me going until this bold faced lie.
Anonymous No.21564773 >>21564775
>>21564721
>Cote d'Ivoire
*CΓ΄te
Anonymous No.21564775 >>21564778
>>21564662
>>21564732
You guys just simply won't get it, until you'll be able to try some of those personally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ0F9C0GZaU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h9EJaSP6MU

>>21564772
Educate yourself, uneducated dumbass.

>>21564773
We don't have that letter in our language, I can't type that.
Anonymous No.21564778 >>21564783
>>21564775
it's called Ivory Coast in english btw
you can also copy paste the letter from google if you insist on mixing languages
Anonymous No.21564780 >>21564790 >>21564798
>>21564721
>Cocoa plant originated in southern part of American continent, but nowadays the largest and most prominent grower and producer of cocoa beans on the planet is African continent, specifically so Cote d'Ivoire that was mentioned earlier ITT.
???? Chocolate grows in the tropics only. It's from MΓ©xico. That's in North America. Cocoa grows from the Amazon to MΓ©xico and the Mesoamericans were the first to domesticate the plant.

>The plant originated on American continent, this is true, but that original plant produced beans of way lesser quality and tasting experience than the modern grown one, as climate of Africa was proven to be the best and most suitable for the plant, resulting in way better quality of beans and taste of end product. It is what it is.
A lot of good quality cocoa is grown in MΓ©xico and Central America, like Guatemala, etc.

>Besides, Mexico, Chile, and Brazil are all in the OP's list, and all of those are technically descendants of native south Americans who prepared and used chocolate for ceremonial purposes. So, hey.
Only Mexicans.
Chileans descend from another native tribe who was nomadic and didn't grow cocoa. It doesn't grow there, it's too cold.
Brazilians descend from Africans and Euros, the few that come from natives didn't grow cocoa either.

Your knowledge is very lacking no wonder you have these midwit opinions.
It's no longer the 1980s old man, you can find many premium Mexican chocolate brands these days and from all over the world.
Anonymous No.21564783 >>21564785
>>21564778
>it's called Ivory Coast
It's called Cote d'Ivoire. Leave that muttlard anglosuxxon shit outta my orbit.
Anonymous No.21564785 >>21564816
>>21564783
>Cote d'Ivoire.
*CΓ΄te
Educate yourself, uneducated dumbass.
Anonymous No.21564789 >>21564801
>>21563151 (OP)
>no new zealand
>australia
Anonymous No.21564790 >>21564806
>>21564780
>Chocolate grows in the tropics only
How to tell us you're uneducated brainwashed retard without telling us you're uneducated brainwashed retard, any% speedrun.

>it's from Mexico
It's from southern American continent. Period.
Look, I like Gansito just as much as you do, but get your retarded brainwashed uneducated spic ass the fuck out of here, cabron.
Anonymous No.21564791 >>21564805
>>21563151 (OP)
If you place items as tied in a list, they're supposed to take up two ranking spots
so your list should read:
1- Belgian
T2- German
T2- Swiss
4- French
Anonymous No.21564798 >>21564800 >>21564814
>>21564780
>Only Mexicans
Are you fucking blind, or just that much of an illiterate retard?

Nobody said anything about growing the plant, cretin. It was about local manufacturing and local brands of chocolate makers. They might've sourced beans from Mexico or other places, but domestic brands and turning that cocoa powder or raw cocoa beans into powder and then into chocolate products doesn't mean they're have to grow their own plants, dumbass. Are you saying Russia should grow their own cocoa plants? You're fucking braindead, if you do.
Anonymous No.21564800
>>21564798
you seem upset
Anonymous No.21564801
>>21564789
>no New Zealand
Never been there, so can't say anything about any potential domestic manufacturers or brands of chocolate, if there are even any in there. But I highly suspect it's just shit imported from neighboring Ausschwitzland.
Anonymous No.21564805
>>21564791
No, they are set as "tied" if they're exactly, literally absolutely 1-to-1 on the same level. Meaning there is virtually no difference between the two whatsoever, when directly compared to each-other on quality of packaging and manufacturing and taste-tested back-to-back against each-other.
Anonymous No.21564806 >>21564808
>>21564790
>How to tell us you're uneducated brainwashed retard without telling us you're uneducated brainwashed retard, any% speedrun.
Man Russians are really fucking stupid.
It ONLY grows in the tropics. Do you have trouble locating the tropics on a world map?

>It's from southern American continent. Period.
It's from the central equatorial band from MΓ©xico to the Amazon, idiot.

>get your retarded brainwashed uneducated spic ass the fuck out of here
Ironic as fuck given you don't have a basic grasp on geography.
Anonymous No.21564808 >>21564818
>>21564806
>It ONLY grows in the tropics
How to tell us you're uneducated brainwashed retard without telling us you're uneducated brainwashed retard, any% speedrun, world record.
Anonymous No.21564814 >>21564848
>>21564798
You said the natives from Brazil, Mexico and Chile grew the cocoa beans, this is wrong, out of all those countries only the Mexican natives did, now you are trying to course-correct because you are a fucking moron.
Anonymous No.21564816
>>21564785
Real humanese languages don't have that shit in their vocabularies.
Anonymous No.21564818 >>21564844
>>21564808
The map speaks for itself, BTFO
Anonymous No.21564819
>>21564772
Orange is an apple genetically. This was proven decades ago.
Holy fuck mutts are total room temperature IQ.
Anonymous No.21564844
>>21564818
Reading comprehension is really not one of your fortes, it seems. Learn to read what was said earlier.
Anonymous No.21564848 >>21564870
>>21564814
I never said they grew cocoa beans.
I said they prepared chocolate for ceremonies, which they did. The plant was sourced, it spread to other southern parts of the American continent.
You have to be ultra-retarded to think tribes of pre-Conquista invasion period didn't interact with each-other in any ways at all. Cocoa was available in Chile and Brazil.
Anonymous No.21564859
>>21564696
You can't just grow chocolate as we know it today. Until the 19th century it was a very sour drink reserved for the richest of the rich. In the 1820s a Dutch guy called Van Houten greatly improved an earlier Italian process by a guy called Ghirardelli which led to edible chocolate as we know it today.

It wasn't until a Swiss apothecary called Neuhaus set up shop in Belgium and began selling his pills wrapped in chocolate that it became publicly available. His grandson dropped the pills and inserted all kinds of nuts, cream and dried fruits instead. That was in 1912.
Anonymous No.21564870 >>21564886
>>21564848
Why do you double down on things you know nothing about? Evidence of cocoa use for ceremonial rituals only extends as far south as the upper Amazon. It was an Aztec and Mayan thing (Mexico and Central America), that *maybe* extended to Colombia, Venezuela and Ecuador through trade, but not much further.

The Incas from Peru and Bolivia did not consume cocoa, they had a very different diet and ceremonies. And the natives to the south of them were hunter-gatherer nomads that mostly ate what they hunted or fished, (I think they also grew potatoes), but again no cocoa, it's a very specific Mesoamerican product.
Anonymous No.21564886 >>21564890
>>21564870
I guess you really are incapable of reading comprehension. What a waste of my time.

Also
>AI chatbots
Literally unironically kys.
Anonymous No.21564890 >>21564893
>>21564886
Cope.
Anonymous No.21564893
>>21564890
d'Ivoire
Anonymous No.21564928 >>21564971 >>21565192 >>21565218
>>21564340
At least she doesn't STARE INTO YOUR SOUL like the other one
Anonymous No.21564971
>>21564928
The other one was based on actual real photo of a 3~4 yo girl who was brand's creator's daughter. It is literally same thing as with Wendy in the Wendy's logo and ads being based on creator's daughter. So it's a bit of an uncanny valley, since it's hyper-realistic as it was basically drawn directly from a real photo.

Belarusian "Alesya" (diminutive of "Alicia" or "Alice") is a completely drawn from scratch imagery, however, there is no real girl to base it off of, though many USSR's children looked like that, especially considering the fashion, which is a casual usual little girl dress from "early 1960's to mid-1970's" period of USSR. It's very reminiscent of promotional/advertisement art that was used in 1950's US, almost pinup-like.
Anonymous No.21565187 >>21565195
>>21564744
I didn't ask for your life story, it was a yes or no question. You must sense that I see you as a retard for making that a factor, and you'd be right. Nothing you say about chocolate ranking means anything anymore for me or anyone else in the thread now so good job. Feel free to write another wall of text I won't read to get your ya-ya's out if you like.
Anonymous No.21565190 >>21565195
>>21563172
People who eat chili chocolate are subhuman
Anonymous No.21565192
>>21564928
There is also Belarus' own take on "Alyonka" herself, basically just "licensed localization" of sorts of it, since Belarusian language differs a little bit from Russian, which they call "Beloved Alyonka" to distinct it from Russian one, but that one's not as popular as Belarusian domestic "Alesya" (also, "Beloved Alyonka" looks like a straight up sluttified lolita on Belarusian version's package, which is effing bizarre as fuck):
Anonymous No.21565195 >>21565205
>>21565187
>>21565190
0/10, you must tryhard way more than just that, kiddo.
Anonymous No.21565197
oh is the chocolate market finally in panic mode where it needs to reinvent itself and inject a bunch of wild bullshit into product discussions again? neat.
Anonymous No.21565201
There was also this thing, just a couple months back:
Anonymous No.21565205 >>21565209
>>21565195
The only one tryharding is OP and his endless walls of text pretending to know anything about chocolate. I'm just telling you you're a retard for factoring in packaging in any way beyond what it takes for it to safely get to you. And I'm right, I speak wisdom here.
Anonymous No.21565209 >>21565229
>>21565205
0/10, you must tryhard way more than just that.
Anonymous No.21565218
>>21564113
>>21564343
>>21564928
Anonymous No.21565228
*1962
Anonymous No.21565229 >>21565248
>>21565209
You want me to be like OP about packaging? Let me channel him.

Selection box
For other uses, see The Selection Box.
Cadbury's Christmas selection box

A selection box is a boxed gift consisting of a variety of edible items, usually chocolate based. They are generally associated with Christmas, particularly in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
History

Selection boxes became common around the early 20th century in Britain.[1] Chocolatiers, Rowntree's and Cadbury pioneered the early selection boxes which were saved for by way of a Christmas club over many months, to be collected around Christmas time.[1] Choice and variation of contents were the consumer's choice, and often the value of the selection box would exceed a week's wages. In more modern times the selection box as we know it has become a staple Christmas gift of chocolate. Each chocolate company produces these at Christmas time and they are often filling the spaces near supermarket checkouts. In the 1960s and 1970s the selection box took on a more commercialized approach with games printed on the reverse of the boxes such as snakes and ladders, adding to the desirability of each brand's selection box offering. Children expectantly received a selection box each year and regarded them as a main Christmas gift. More recently the commercial arms of the chocolate companies insist on filling their festive selection boxes with predefined chocolate bar selections, and many a child will receive in excess of six selection boxes each Christmas.[2][3][4]

That enough useless words for you? Retard.
Anonymous No.21565230 >>21565235 >>21565242
>>21563298
Based knowledge sharer, I assume all the other posts are yours as well.

>time machine
And it's not the only part of the culture to share that aspect, unironically both for better and worse. I wonder what the time capsule will look like after the current Iron Curtain falls.
Anonymous No.21565235 >>21565249
>>21565230
USSR never imposed so-called "Iron Curtain" on anyone, it was complete reverse. Westardoids and yurop did it TO people of USSR. Here's direct proof:
Anonymous No.21565242 >>21565249
>>21565230
and again:
Anonymous No.21565244 >>21565249
ditto (construction completed, Reagan on suicide watch):
Anonymous No.21565248 >>21565255
>>21565229
>wikipedia
Unironically off yourself, tranny.
Especially now, after happened yesterday.
Anonymous No.21565249 >>21565251 >>21565256
>>21565235
>>21565242
>>21565244
I never ascribed blame, it's just a fact, but I'd rather have shitty American chocolate than commie cancer.
Anonymous No.21565251 >>21565309
>>21565249
>I never ascribed blame, it's just a fact
USSR never put up "Iron Curtain", so your "fact" is utter Goebbels'esque bullshit propaganda brainwash for gullible retards (a.k.a. 69% of yurop and 96% of Burgerlardistan).

As for "commie cancer", Russian medical sector literally reported just a couple weeks back that they've found absolutely safe and completely working cure for several types of cancer, they are in final stages of testing and approving for general treatment. Get fucked, loser.
Anonymous No.21565255
>>21565248
Yeah that was the joke. Maybe it wasn't packaged obviously enough for you.
Anonymous No.21565256 >>21565273
>>21565249
>I'd rather have shitty American chocolate than commie cancer
This is literally you:
Anonymous No.21565271 >>21565276 >>21565304
>>21563152
Try hard bullshit. No one enjoys that bitter ass shit they just pretend to to look cool
Anonymous No.21565273
>>21565256
>BTFO by the USSR
Not him but how'd that end up going for them?
>Afghanistan
Honestly man how'd that end up going for the USSR? I wouldn't be mentioning Afghanistan if I was trying to brag up the USSR.
Anonymous No.21565276 >>21565284
>>21565271
I do.
Anonymous No.21565284 >>21565308
>>21565276
No you dont
Anonymous No.21565285
>>21564696
>where chocolate comes from
How is it there, in 1491?
Anonymous No.21565304
>>21565271
It's a very acquired taste thing. Usually you're not supposed to directly eat any chocolate more concentrated than 75% at most, so 80%+ choco is specifically designed for cooking purposes and ritual consumption, with 99% tasting like a friggin' tyre rubber. But some people develop strong crave for that afterwards, because it IS extremely rich in flavonoids and other elements which make chocolate extremely addictive, almost equaling heavy drugs. If and once you're in, it's extremely hard to pull out, this shit DOES make junkies out of people.

The >>21563172 picrel, for example, is usually at least 75%, and it's already so tasty, savory, and addictive, especially due to very particular triggering in the brain cells due to it being bitter, sweet, and spicy at the same time, bringing prolonged pleasant comfy warmth feeling as an aftertaste in the mouth, all of which human brain discerns as very good feelings, that it's super-hard to not consume it every single day. You can literally unironically get addicted to this shit.
Anonymous No.21565308
>>21565284
But i do.
Anonymous No.21565309
>>21565251
>As for "commie cancer", Russian medical sector literally reported just a couple weeks back that they've found absolutely safe and completely working cure for several types of cancer, they are in final stages of testing and approving for general treatment. Get fucked, loser
When I was a kid, Cuba was about to roll out the cure for cancer and BTFO the West. This was in the 1990s. But alas I grew up and realized that it was propaganda. Russians are fucking retarded.

>knowledge-sharer
>mentally ill vatnik nostalgic of the Soviet Union and ranting that everyone there ate the best chocolate in the world on a regular basis (when we know there were shortages of basic goods)
Pick one