Thread 21578172

Why is /ck/ one of the most toxic and hypercritical boards of 4chan? It's no /b/ or /pol/. But I can't ever get a good word of positive reinforcement in edgewise whenever I post here. Even /v/ and /a/ or even /his/ are nowhere near this bad on a regular basis.

>>21578172 (OP)
stop posting with your beemer keys(or fagmotes as i like to call them) and maybe you will get some positive feedback

>>21578172 (OP)
it really isn't

I ate a whole bag of crispy noodles on their own today. I think you're supposed to use them in salads but I did not.

>>21578178
Nobody asked for you cacophony of buzzwords, fag muffler.

/b/ is already in ruins, what are you looking at?

>>21578203
ladies and gentlemen, i gottem

>>21578205
Your mom's wrinkly old kosher fossil ass while you get a hold of deez nuts in yo mouth.

>>21578172 (OP)
Its really not anon. It feels like theres a bunch of toddlers running around here and a few adults. They mean no harm, just being silly

>>21578172 (OP)
>thinking /ck/ is worse than b, pol, v, a or his
lol, are you mad that someone called you out for eating mcdonalds?

This board is /pol/ /a/ /ck/

>>21578172 (OP)
Shitposts stand out more on slower boards. And something basic like food will attract people who don't have anything better to do than shitpost online compared to other more niche hobby/interest boards.

>>21578172 (OP)
Every board is terrible if you're looking for an actual conversation. 4chan as a whole has been incapable of that since around the late 00s or so. Sure, a convo can happen but you never come here expecting that. This is where you dump your trash and piss and shit. Those that still post here that actually desire conversations like that are so irony poisoned that they'll probably bait you because they expect that you're doing the same thing.

>>21578277
every interaction on every board on every internet is the same, dickhead. All the cool people died a long time ago.

>>21578172 (OP)
I don't think it's worse than any other hobby board. but the bar for content here is really, really low compared to other hobby boards, and any criticism of that gets labelled as negativity which is nonsense. just look at the catalog and how many threads are up at any given time of people just blogposting about their totally mundane slop on a plate. on no other board do people post such low effort content and expect to be praised for it. if I posted something equivalently low effort on like /lit/ or /mu/ I would be met with a much harsher reaction than you get here. for some reason people on /ck/ think it's ok to post low quality content and still get the same level of discussion you would on other boards.
seriously just post some half decent looking food that you put a modicum of effort in, or at least try to make your thread interesting instead of just "look at my food", and it will be better than 90% of the posts on here and get positive engagement. of course there's still going to be trolls tearing you down for no reason, but that's just 4chan.

>>21578288
This isn't true at all. Your mindset is just poisoned.

>>21578294
well nobody worth a shit is going to post on a board that doesn't respect free speech, so that leaves 4chan and the deep web.

>>21578172 (OP)
Maybe everything you post sucks because you're a genuinely unlikable person and that's why you only get negative feedback

>>21578289
>look at my food
I hate those threads. I like cookalongs, even the most poorfag, retarded ass backwards slop cookalong is fun. Unless of course it’s 30 pictures and gifs of some cocklock boiling cabbage and trimming the leaves.

>>21578219
>>21578226
Look at these complete faggots

>>21578422
>cocklock
do you mean some sort of penis warlock?

>>21578422
yeah cookalongs are great. I don't expect everybody to be putting out restaurant quality food all the time, I eat slop sometimes too, you know. but for fuck's sake put some effort into your post if you're not gonna put it into your food. all the boring "look at my food" posts are also low quality food. it's shit food, it's a shit thread, what is the fucking point of them and why do people feel the need to post that shit.

>>21578459
so why dont you post a cookalong instead of bitching in a non-cook along related thread?

>>21578172 (OP)
Meta belongs on /qa/.
Lurk moar, newfag.

>>21578172 (OP)
/v/ is the most negative board on the entire chan

>>21578480
cookalongs aren't the only kind of content I like, it's just an example. god forbid I discuss the quality of the board in a thread about the quality of the board.

the board gradually became infested with actual drunkards with lots of opinions and nothing to back them up with, even though what they're replying to is fun trying to make each other laugh by being more retarded sounding than the last

This board is full of zoomers and manchildren who affirm and reinforce each other's lack of capabilities to function like a normal human being. Especially in the area of cooking. So you have fucking retards thinking they're a genius for putting some green onion and a fried egg on instant ramen. These are also most likely the """connoisseurs""" creating the fast food threads to 'debate' what the best dipping sauce or give each other tips on how to make their 'meals' even more disgusting, again thinking they're fucking geniuses.

meta threads are cancer and against >>>/global/rules/3 >>>/global/rules/8 and >>>/ck/rules/1
OP is a faggot.
Fulfill your civic duty to help purge this board of anarchistic, sociopathic, intellectually regressive youtube/reddit/twitter immigrant subhumans like him who are under the delusion that all of 4chan (instead of just the designated shitposting playpens like /b/, /trash/, /bant/, etc.) is a toilet by reporting this thread en masse.
Here's a link so you don't have to scroll up to the top of the page.
https://sys.4chan.org/ck/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=21578172

>>21578525
Everything you have listed is legitimate content. If you want something a little more ‘highbrow’ you know where you should fuck off back to.
Lurk moar, newfag tourist.

>>21578510
>god forbid I discuss the quality of the board in a thread about the quality of the board.
That also applies to both the post you are replying to and this post in which I am posting right now and the reply you post and my inevitable reply and so forth and so forth forever and ever and ever

I initially came here to discuss food, now I just come back to laugh at amerislop

>>21578538
They're so fucking stupid they'll parrot "reddit" or "newfag" as that's all their 70 IQ can fucking cogitate. They cannot comprehend that those subhuman topics are dogshit to 'oldfags' as well. I know because I am one, yet I'm getting told to "lurk moar" by some no doubt noodle-armed, fresh little cunt.

/ck/ is one of the nicer boards tho...

>>21578570
>hooked
Kek.
Too easy, newfag.