Thread 21606808

.

>>21606808 (OP)
damn, they're honoring a fallen brother. Rest in Paradise king

>>21606808 (OP)
Do you expect McDonald's to fly their flag higher than the US flag when the latter is at half staff?

>>21606821
Yes. Corporations are the kings of America.

>>21606808 (OP)
>making fun of the political assassination of a man with a wife and child
I'm gonna ruin your fucking life OP.

>>21606880
i mean events aside the mcdonald's flag being held at half mast is fucking hilarious. the memes are true

>>21606886
It doesn't fucking matter. You don't joke about this. You and your ilk spent years cancelling us for being against crime and black degeneracy, now it's your turn to get cancelled.

>>21606880
>>21606896
You're acting like a huge crybaby faggot

Probably best to simply remove the company flag when the national flag is at half-staff.

>>21606896
ah go fuck yourself ideologue. you guys are literally the SJWs of the aughts, blind frothy mouthed retards with full diapers and no sense of humor. i'm not laughing at the fact charlie kirk died, i'm laughing at the fact the fucking mcdonald's flag is at half mast. >>21606908 is right

>>21606920
Well I can laugh at both. Haha! Hahaha!

>>21606880
hello saar

>>21606808 (OP)
Why is the flag at half msst for a random faggot from a ZOG think tank? Does every servant of Israel get this level of deferrence?

>>21607025
this was actually from when hulk hogan died (RIP)

>>21607027
based

>>21607031
This is getting out of fucking hand. A local new site had an obituary listing for this fucker. He wasn't even from this fucking town. I mean, ffs, 9/11 was the day after he was killed and it seemed like most people were more concerned with this guy's death rather than a real national tragedy

Yikes

>>21606808 (OP)
THE WEST HAS FALLEN

>>21607074
Maybe they forgot.

>>21607074
politics is just theatre for the goyim

>>21606924
Based laugher

>>21606920
>you guys are literally the SJWs of the aughts, blind frothy mouthed retards with full diapers and no sense of humor
lol. No, you're quite literally the SJWs of the aughts. The term was invented to describe rabid cancel hungey leftists who wanted everyone who disagreed with them exiled from public life. Then they pretended there was no such thing as cancel culture, only the consequences of one's own actions. The frothy mouthed retards are the SJWs who scream and cry and shout down and cancel anyone who disagrees with them. The full diaper people are furries and the assorted degenerates in their circle. No sense of humor is getting Roseanne fired. It's canceling Norm McDonald for defending her. It's getting Aziz Ansari blacklisted. It's getting Al Franken blacklisted. It's getting Louis CK blacklisted. It's firing Kevin Hart from the Oscars. And on and on and on for the past decade. Your lies don't work here. But yeah, lowering the McD's flag is always funny and it is so it isn't higher than the US flag.

>>21606924
bASED

>>21607190
N-nooo! Not Rosanne! Not poor poor Louis! N-Norm, NORM. NORRRRRRMMMMMM!!!

>>21607190
Nazifurs are a thing you know?

>>21606920
I'm laughing at conservacucks freaking out that a guy who said some gun deaths every year were worth it for the second amendment, that kids should bear witness to public executions, and that empathy was a bad new-age thing that liberals invented, got executed publicly in front of his kids by gunshot and shit on for it. It's probably the funniest thing to happen all year, though, yeah, McD's flying at half mast does give it a run for its money.

Please do the needful.

Salute the flag, sirs.

>>21606880
"When ya mess with Israel ya mess with me"

>>21607074
Pretty sure the president even skipped a 9/11 memorial service to go to this guy's funeral, a professional troll paid to be an annoying internet reply guy by literal astroturf orgs is considered more important than 1500 americans who were just going to work that day, we truly live in the Back to the Future Biff Tannen timeline

>>21607730
Realest American Patriot.

>>21607723
o7

>>21608418
It's a dark period in American history

Didn't this guy say that gun deaths were necessary because it protects peoples amendment rights to own guns?

Dumb ass nigga got what he wanted.

>>21608417
\o

This is literally a /pol/ thread, not a /ck/ thread. It was on /pol/ yesterday. FUCK OFF POLTARDS!!! Keep your sperging on your containment board, please.

>>21608806
Dilate

>>21608810
I do not have a vagina to dilate, child. You clearly do. Enjoy dilating.

>>21608820
Why are you asking a child to dilate her vagina?

>>21608806
Ga back nigger

>>21608828
This is why your life is already over, stlaker. Enjoy prison. >>21608830
You can't say that word here, you racist. Enjoy prison, racist child.

>>21606880
>>21606896
unironically >>>/pol/

>>21607190
You can't actually be defending aziz ansaari. This has to be a joke.

>>21608878
Just those two posts?

>>21607190
The party in power always pretends cancel culture doesn't exist while they do it while the other side pounds the table, you just started noticing around 2016.

>>21609089
>you just started noticing around 2016.
lol no. It is interesting that you couldn't refute any point and instead defaulted to "both sides bad" and "politics began in 2016 with Trump".

I apolgize for posting in an off topic /pol/ thread.

>>21609138
The shit he described has been happening far before 2016, people like that retard just happened to start noticing then. People have been getting "cancelled" without that specific name since we had society, it's all just good branding.

>>21609142
>since we had society
Since OWS when mainstream society started noticing the jew.

I wish I could bring back the dead so I can kill this dumbass over and over again. The dumbass Kirk had it coming.

>>21609158
You used to get drawn and quartered for disagreeing with the people in power. Even in America, losing your livelihood for having an unpopular opinion has been a thing since the inception of this country and it never stopped. It used to be much worse. Getting your shit rekt for publicly having an unpopular opinion goes farther back than than 2016, the state things are in is a lot better than it used to be.

Why are people so mad he died? Jesus obviously wanted him to get shot in cold blood like all those school chilldren.

>>21609142
That's why I called him out for implying politics began in 2016. I don't know if he's retarded or intentionally spreading disinfo. I strongly suspect it's the latter.

Also I think we all know why this literal /pol/ thread is being kept up. On topic I love McDonald's and love the McDonald's flag and I love /ck/ and I love anime and all that stuff.

>>21609165
The people who laughed when trump made fun of Pelosi's husband nearly getting killed are now very upset about political violence. Please understand, now specifically is the time for empathy.

>>21609170
>Pelosi's husband
Did anyone care? You could have chosen a holier man like George Floyd.

>>21609169
I am the guy who you said implied that politics started in 2016. I didn't say that. I just said that retard started noticing in 2016. What the fuck is there to refute in this post >>21607190
when anyone with a brain understands that "cancelling" is not a 2016-and-onwards phenomenon? Everything he says stems from that one stupid point. Oh man Louis CK, public masturbator got cancelled for exposing himself and jacking off in front of random people, those rotten lefties.
The pol thread is up because people would rather shitpost than report it and mods don't give a fuck.

>>21609170

I don't understand the people whining about hypocrisy. Of course its hypocritical. I don't care or want the other side to be on an even footing. The party which may not fully represents me but which mostly aligns with my priorities is in power and is finally beating their enemies over the head like they should have been doing since the Obama years. I'm glad they're neutering hostile NGOs and USAID and running the corporate media out of business. I do not value or care about my enemies and they did not value or care about me, so I will be happy to get every bit of ground that can be taken, even if it's petty.

And if that means we get to meme about Paul Pelosi getting hammerfucked by a homeless man he probably wanted to have gay buttsex with, great. Kirk might have been a zogbot but he wasn't a demon on the level of the pelosis.

>>21609176
>did anyone care?
Not when it was someone on the left, no. If Kirk's wife got her head halfway caved in by a hammer they'd be clutching pearls though, because it's not really about political violence as a concept, it's just not liking when it happens to their side.

>>21609184
>I don't understand people having principles or values
You wouldn't.

>>21609192
I see you kept a few things from your time at r/the_donald.

>>21609183
I apologize for misinterpreting your post, I thougt you were calling me a retard who thought politics began in 2016. Btw I wrote >>21607190

Everyone in the comedy scene knew about Louis CKs behavior btw. It was an open secret. He joked about it on the Opie & Anthony Show more than a decade before he was #metooed for it and normies found out.

>>21609186
That is a ridiculous comparison and you know it.
Mr. Pelosi wasn't a public speaker who dared people to debate and got his neck blown out in 4K by a gay man who was furious that Mr. Kirk claimed a man in a spinny dress and bad makeup isn't actually a woman.

But yeah, great /ck/ thread.

Humanity was a mistake.

>>21606976
Rent-free.

>>21609215
Mr.Pelosi's situation was far more egregious than the Kirk one because it wasn't Mrs.Pelosi, public speaker and lawmaker, who had an attempt made on her life, it was her family member.
Either you think it's wrong to try to kill someone for engaging in lawfully trying to influence their country, or you don't. Either you think it's okay to target the family members of such people, or you don't. Anything you feel about the Kirk situation being wrong is much more so with the Pelosi one.
>he just said that a man in a dress wasn't a woman
He and his organization were put in charge of a lot of the ground operations in the trump campaign in 2024. You can pretend he was just a guy who said trannies are bad but he was in fact a very influential political activist and organization head deeply involved with the campaign for the now-president.

>>21609229
Mr. Pelosi is still alive thankfully. The lunatic who attacked him was apparently too retarded to kill a frail elderly man. I know you know the difference between a very politically active man being shot to death in 4K in broad daylight before thousands of people for his opinions and the non-public spouse of a politcal figure being hammered on the head in his home at night without an audience.

>He and his organization were put in charge of a lot of the ground operations in the trump campaign in 2024. You can pretend he was just a guy who said trannies are bad but he was in fact a very influential political activist and organization head deeply involved with the campaign for the now-president.

There it is. He deserved to die because he was "a very influential political activist and organization head deeply involved with the campaign for the now-president".

>>21609246
>he didn't die though
So it would have been okay if Kirk didn't die? What kind of tard logic is that? Again either you think it's okay to try to kill people who lawfully exercise their rights to influence the country, or you don't. Either you think it's okay to target the family members of those involved, or you don't.
Do you think it's okay to try to kill people who lawfully exercise their rights with the goal of influencing their country's politics?

>he deserved it because-
When the fuck did I say he deserved it? The anon I replied to was just immensely stupid in thinking that Kirk was just a random fuck debating people and not an influential political figure in charge of the current president's campaign's ground game. If you think that makes him a valid target for violence then that's your opinion, it's pretty clear that I don't but I'll say it explicitly so you do not misunderstand. I do not think Kirk or Mr.Pelosi should have attempts made on their lives for being influential politically through legal means, or being married to such influential people.

>>21606880
How are you even coming to that conclusion here? You are online too much.

>>21606896
We can joke about whatever we want, bigot. You are not part of any "we". No one claims you. Eat shit.

>>21606808 (OP)
YO!

>>21609254
What did you mean by this
>Mr.Pelosi's situation was far more egregious than the Kirk one

>>21609310
I mean that Nancy Pelosi and Charlie Kirk are both influential political figures, and it is wrong to enact violence or attempt to kill them because they are exercising legal rights. But it is worse still in my view to try to kill those associated with such people through marriage or other relationships, because they are an entire level removed from the actions and influence of the people themselves. If you find it wrong to try to kill a person for exercising legal rights you disagree with politically, it is even more wrong to try to kill people who aren't even exercising those legal rights, but are just related to those people in some way. If the guy who killed Charlie Kirk instead killed his wife, I would consider that to be even worse than what had actually taken place, because he wouldn't even be killing the person who did things he disagreed with, just someone tangentially related to the person he disagreed with.
You're welcome to disagree with that, but if you will cop to there being better or worse reasons to kill a person, for example killing a person in self-defense being less wrong than killing a person because you wanted a candy bar they were eating, then you'd be insane not to agree that killing someone married to a person you disagree with is more wrong than killing a person you disagree with. It is not a hard concept.

>>21609387
Just vote harder

>>21609387
I completely agree with
>Nancy Pelosi and Charlie Kirk are both influential political figures, and it is wrong to enact violence or attempt to kill them because they are exercising legal rights.
I think the rest of your post is incoherent rambling trying to justify your assertion that
>Mr.Pelosi's situation was far more egregious than the Kirk one
And no one seemed to care. Where were the riots or protests or mass vigils? It was 2022 when Biden was prez.

>>21609478
So you agree that it's wrong to try to kill a person because you disagree with them exercising legal rights... but somehow don't see how it's worse to try to kill that person's spouse instead? To kill someone for no real reason, just for being related to a person? Are you retarded?
>no one seemed to care
It doesn't make something more or less wrong just because one side clutches pearls harder. Pelosi's husband was not nearly as popular as Kirk, which apparently factors into your moral weighting of who you try to kill. I'm beginning to see why you are having issues understanding such basic things about logic and ethics. I have been very clear with my points but if your moral calculus depends on whether a person was popular enough for a vigil and you don't see how trying to kill family members of a political figure is worse than killing the figure themselves, you do not have the capacity to actually discuss this.
I hate McDonald's, have a nice day.