Thread 21644446

A reminder that our food has become so bad that it now makes you infertile and prone to cancer

>>21644446 (OP)
According to California everything gives you cancer

you're forgetting the actuality that california is retarded.

P65 is so dumb, it should label coffee as a cancerous product, so they carved out a specific exception for coffee specifically. y'know, instead of thinking 'hey maybe this whole law is moronic'.

>>21644448
For reference, the average cup of coffee contains double the safe harbor level for acrylamide, and also contains caffeic acid which P65 list with no safe harbor level. All coffee should have a P65 warning slapped on it because of these (and probably others), but doesn't because, uhh... reasons!

>>21644446 (OP)
well... seems kosha

>>21644448
It probably is carcinogenic, especially the darker roasts.

>>21644446 (OP)
I've got bad news about red and processed meats anon. Also booze and anything browned. People have been eating/drinking carcinogenic foods and drinks for thousands of years

>>21644457
>the average cup of coffee contains double the safe harbor level for acrylamide

Dark Roast temperatures break these down. It's Mediums and Lights that are the problem.

>>21644568
So, just the good coffee?

>>21644562
>>21644568
>coffee
it also has more antioxidants than pretty much anything else in our diets. Overall it is probably a net positive

>>21644446 (OP)
Does it matter?
You will die a virgin and most likely you will kill yourself because women don't want you anyway
So who cares?

>>21644446 (OP)
It's canada. They think air causes cancer but indians are a necessary daily intake for the women.

>>21644621
>canada
Lol, it's California

>>21644562
Darker roasts have less acrylamide.

>>21644446 (OP)
>makes you infertile

My ugly ass is not having any kids anyway.

Bring on the ultra processed goyslop.

At least I will die with a full belly and a smile on my face.

>>21644446 (OP)
>product of Korea
Well there's your answer.

>49 states have no regulations on what cancerous materials can be sold in food
>This is shaped into a criticism of the one that does

>>21647024
>The one that does thinks every food has cancerous materials making the warnings and guidelines useless
You're still missing the point, aren't you?

>>21644446 (OP)
>>21644448
This is the same state that was shutting down everything but gave Disneyland and injun casinos an exemption to stay open during COVID.

The funny things is those warning labels are basically ignored by 99% of the populace here. The sentiment of a warning label is fine and all but you can't run the state on sentiment alone.

This thread just gave everyone in California cancer

>>21644644
>california
>french instead of spanish
lol
lmao

>>21648517
I wish.

>>21644446 (OP)
California would put a warning label on the sun

this is barely food

>>21644447
this. I worked at a chemical plant. 80% of chemical warnings are total nothingburgers. Unless you do something retarded with it, no, the average hazardous chemical will not hurt you.
The 20% of labels that matter? Have fun guessing whether "Toxic" is paraquat grade toxic (will not kill you unless you're retarded, my boss literally swam in it once) or sodium fluoroacetate poisonous (a tiny jar can kill you 50,000 times over)
a specific example: trifluralin "is suspected of causing cancer". Yeah, one shitty study found a weak link to ass-cancer amongst workers exposed to a gazillion chemicals and the result was never reproduced.

>>21648546
It matters more where its packaged, yes some California products don't have Spanish but Korean, French, German, Portuguese, Chinese...
Depends how cheap and where you buy.

>>21647024
Prop 65 is the epitome of poorly-designed consumer protection legislation.

>>21644446 (OP)
The sodium in ramen will give you a heart attack long before you get cancer