Thread 21673631

Has anyone else noticed the 20,000 fake recipes appearing online, which are AI generated plagiarism from actual chefs?

First there were clickbait, SEO, AI websites which generated filler content to game Google search, but now AI is actually attempting to write recipes.
Total cancer.

there's no such thing as recipe plagiarism

do yourself a favor and buy an old copy of "the joy of cooking"

>>21673631 (OP)
>Has anyone else noticed the 20,000 fake recipes appearing online, which are AI generated plagiarism from actual chefs?
No? Where the fuck are you looking for recipes?

I found one blog that I susepected of being AI, including pictures, but it turned out it's really just someone who's terrible at cooking.

I noticed a new trend on YouTube when searching for whipped caramel which is not entirely ai but pajeet assisted, there is this new thing of ai narrated shorts that use either ai generated footage or random clips from other cooking vids .... I noticed that in the video One moment the caramel is liquid and next thing it looks like whipped cream because it's from a video where cream cheese is mixed in the caramel

https://youtu.be/ohV1kOCFN2A?si=R-BVsrwb3w_NAfSg

>>21673677
Says someone who never worked on commercial recipes, paid the costs of consumer testing, wrote a season menu or had a secret recipe.
This is our trade, our business. AI isn't stealing shit but people pose as critics or try to bribe our service staff all the time so they can try to publish it online.

>>21673774
Yea I've gone right back to books, but the quality of cooking books has suffered proportionally to how many people stopped buying them. I have a whole library and grok isn't getting shit.

>>21673837
I've got bad news for you anon..
>>21673915
Same kind of shit.

>>21674051
It's not a very well kept secret if AI can scrape it from the Internet. Frankly I can't see why wouldn't want to share your food with the world so everyone can enjoy it and add their own unique spins onto it.

>>21674051
gr8 b8 m8 but show some of those fake recipes
I'm certain they exist, but I doubt they are high up in serch reasults and hard to distinguish from the real thing

The entire internet is useless now

>>21673915
There was a sushi thread a few days ago here where the captions and voiceover were from something totally unrelated, and all the replies, here on /ck/, were treating it like it was completely normal, even 4chan is overrun with bots, probably half the posts ITT are bots

>>21674067
because not everything is for everyone

>>21674366
Corporate fagmo

>>21673631 (OP)
I follow my favorite chefs still. If I want an opinion on something Italian, I have my 3-4 names to trust. If it is Mexican, or Indian, same. Madhur Jaffrey probably tested every single recipe, for instance.

Grabbing random crap from a quick search was never how I did it. Read more cookbooks?

>>21674366
No, but food is.

I have a physical file of recipes I've printed off of the internet and I am glad I've been doing it for years.

If you use reputable websites, like those that belong to a particular chef, you should be fine. Finding them has become much harder, though. You need to use bookmarks these days, forgotten technology.

>>21673631 (OP)
>see table of contents for the page in a left aligned box near the top
>immediately close browser in disgust

>>21674051
You know you don't have to reply to every poster in the thread, right?

One thing AI ruining everything on the internet by flooding the hell out of it with completely useless shit, but I worry it might start pushing out the old books at some point.
Imagine trying to find a good book on something that can lead to serious injury or death if done improperly, like mushroom identification.

>>21674464
Stock market be damned my cat can grill