>>21703669
There's no logic behind it anon, it's just preference gained from growing up.
I have, since I can remember being interested in girls, had a strong aversion to piercings, tattoos and even large or attention grabbing earrings. God forbid nose rings or other shit like that.
I can't explain it, it's just that when I see a woman with tattoos at best I'll internally think "well that's a bit of a shame" and not care too much and at worst it'll make me not be attracted at all to the woman. It's a bit like seeing a hot woman smoke and thinking "actually nevermind". It doesn't make her any less good looking, but it kills my attraction.
In my case the issue is that I am and always have been a libtard, so a lot of women who are politically or ideologically aligned with me are into that entire bodymodding/tattoo/piercing stuff. Kinda got the short stick on that one, but it should illustrate that (in my case) it's not a "women are degenerate" or "she's not trad enough" or "her body my choice" thing for me, I just really don't like it on a visceral level I can't complain. I don't really mind brightly colored hair (in fact I think it can look quite pretty on some women), but the one libtard indicator that conservatives want you to believe is everywhere I don't actually see much in my daily life. Those fuckers lied to me.
It's not that I think they shouldn't be able to do it, or that I think degenerate, or that I think it's a sign of moral decay or whatever else the moral panic of the week is, I just don't personally like it and will be less attracted to these people.
With picrel it's small enough that I wouldn't mind, but I'd always feel like I'd prefer it not being there I suppose.