>>21706439 (OP) >uses salt and sugar
You're going to catch enough flak for the salt so I'm going to gloss over that but did the recipe you were watching actually have sugar in it historically?
>>21706469
I don't mind people being wrong accidentally but come on guy medieval people didn't have salt???
The sugar point stands though and it angers me when youtubers do this.
>>21706482
Medieval dishes didn't use sugar mate. Maybe the Queen of England or some Venetian prince would have it at some grand feast. The modern equivalent would be like eating a bucket of caviar served on top of some endangered extremely rare and illegal bird or something.
>>21706500
Nobody ever wrote about Medieval dishes except the King of France's scribe and the Duke of Burgundy's wife, who came from Florence in Tuscany. What's your point?