Thread 21715349

When did you realise that vegans were right?

>>21715349 (OP)
what's the catch?

>>21715349 (OP)
>Beef is unsustainable
>Cows are a renewable resource
Wut?

They're literally not. And that's coming from a guy who had tofu for lunch.

>>21715349 (OP)
>When did you realise that vegans were right?
Only nature hating ones.

Nature worshippers are wrong, vegan or carnie.

>>21715349 (OP)
>more calories
Good, I need energy
>more protein
Good.
>more fats and cholesterol
Good, they are both necessary for survival
>Cruel and unsustainable
Jews are far more cruel and it's been sustained for thousands of years

>>21715433
Cool it with the anti semitism

>>21715349 (OP)
>you need calories to survive
>but the option with less calories is an advantage!

>>21715444
How third world are you that your survival depends on maximizing calorie intake? You're dumb enough to make the vegans look almost reasonable.

>>21715454
Every human depends on calorie intake to survive.

>>21715349 (OP)
>more fat, cholesterol, and protein per gram
But beef clearly wins ?

>>21715444
Ok buddy, go ahead and eat an entire kilo of tofu for a single meal

>>21715454
I'm not gonna waste my money on food with less calories. SNAPfags wouldn't understand

>>21715465
>>21715454
I accidentally the wrong post
Damn vegans win again

>>21715349 (OP)
Can't be a coincidence that the most evil man to walk this earth was a vegan.

>>21715454
It's about retards thinking "less calories is better" when it literally just means you have to eat more of it. And of course tofu tastes like shit so you have to eat 3x shit vs 1x tasty meat

>>21715461
Do you depend on maximizing your calorie intake to survive?

>>21715480
I'm not pretending vegans aren't retarded, that's the least dumb thing about that chart honestly.

>>21715492
>Do you depend on maximizing your calorie intake to survive?
No, and irrelevant.

>>21715349 (OP)
tofu has literally nothing to do with vegans

most tofu in the world is eaten WITH beef / pork / fish
not as replacement

>>21715368
there is none

175g smoked tofu (one block) is my regular post workout snack for years
better than that ultra processed protein isolate crap in every conceivable way

>>21715494
It is relevant dumbo. The 110 calorie difference only matters in terms of survival if you need to maximize calories to survive. Otherwise it's just more or less fat/muscle.

who cares it's turkey time

T U R K E Y
I
M
E

>>21715510
You must be a SNAPfag

>>21715349 (OP)
>Beef vs ice
Beef
>180 calories for 100 grams
Ice
>0 calories for 100 grams
Beef
>Dehidratates you
Ice
>Hydrates you
Beef
>Takes 24 hours to digest
Ice
>It takes your body 45 minutes to fully process ice
Beef
>A Mexican choked a chicken on a hidden camera
Ice
>It comes from your freezer for free

>>21715521
kek nice schizo shit

>>21715444
Have you tried scaling up the tofu side for a better comparison?

>>21715545
That's what vegans conveniently leave out.
Every arguement from vegans is manipulative, they can't get a point across barefaced, it always has to be accompanied by fact redaction and buzzwords like "cruel" "torture" "chemicals" to try and make their bullshit more valid.

A 16 oz steak is 453g
453g of Spinach is a fucking massive pile you'd struggle to finish.

>>21715433
>cholesterol
>necessary for survival
Ackchually...
An otherwise healthy person should endogenously produce all the cholesterol they need. In fact, unless you're one of the few with a particular genetic mutation, cholesterol has remarkably poor absorption from diet.

Both pro and anti cholesterol fags are wrong on this one. Dietary cholesterol is just flat out irrelevant for most people.

>>21715516
Counting calories like it's your lifeline is SNAP talk. Starvation language.

>>21715349 (OP)
One of those is delicious and the other tastes like erasers.

>>21715349 (OP)
these never list the micro nutrients because it would make vegans kill themselves

>>21715349 (OP)
>When did you realise that vegans were right?
some time in or before 2020 (when I went vegan)

>>21715567
This image has to be fake.

>>21715582
You don't need to be counting calories to realize that certain foods give you more calories per dollar than others. You wouldn't know that because you get free money every month so you don't need to bother thinking about it.

>>21715567
>453g of Spinach is a fucking massive pile you'd struggle to finish.
because you're not meant to eat that much in a serving you fat fucking seppo. god i can hear how fat you are through the screen.

>calories, proteins and fats are bad
uhh

>>21715614
People with steady incomes that aren't dependent on fluctuating handouts don't need to look at calorie numbers like more is an "advantage". That's poorfag talk. Calorie numbers are irrelevant in a country where food is abundant unless you're a fucking fatass who overeats or you're starving because your free food got cut off. Which are you?

>>21715349 (OP)
i haven’t, are you really touting caloric density like that matters? i want more density not less soygoy

>>21715433
>jews

Even on /ck/? You bigots never give it a rest, do you? What's it like to be obsessed with something that's 100% false? I pity you. No wonder you'll never lose your virginity. lol

>>21715630
Not as good as you, that's for sure. You're rich and fit and superior to everyone. We all bow to your power. You're right about everything.

>>21715349 (OP)
>more nutrition in beef
how are they correct, op?

>>21715648
>bigots
>false
anon...

>>21715349 (OP)
When they became malnourished

>>21715650
>not being a government panhandler scrounging for calories is considered rich these days
I should count my blessings I guess

micronutrient density is important, but getting macros is dirt simple. If you're worried about caloric density just get some crisco, vegetable oil, lard or any other fat.

>>21715369
>cow farts destroying the ozone
>ranch land destroying the amazon

any other flesh eaters that would like to get slaughtered by your local vegan?

>no essential amino acids
>half the plant "protein" is absorbed
>taste like trash
Stop coping tofu fag

>>21715760
>what are supplements
>so eat more
>doesn't know how to cook
yawn, next victim.

>>21715349 (OP)
>Tofu
>Contains valuable vitamins and minerals
For example?

>>21715630
A fool and his money are soon parted

>>21715349 (OP)
Horrible bait. Dumb ass I hate this board. Look up bio - availability . Fucking retards on this board I swear. You all are fat as fuck too.

>>21715955
Bioavailability is one word, dumbass.

>>21715349 (OP)
the numbers don't add up, protein is 4 kcal/g and fat is 9 kcal/g so without knowing carb content the caloric total of left is at least 88, more like 96 since there's likely to be 2 g of carbs as well (at 4 kcal/g)
beef has zero carbs so when we multiply the numbers given we get 178 kcal
SO when we normalize to 200 kcal each, we get
>beef
112.4 g serving, 24.7 g protein, 11.2 g fat, 0 g carbs
>tofu
208.3 g serving, 27.1 g protein, 8.3 g fat, 4.2 g carbs
it's basically a wash but the beef tastes better

>>21715569
>should endogenously produce all the cholesterol they need.
from what if you're not getting good fats?

>>21715349 (OP)
I like eating tofu with meat, it's a good filler ingredient like rice or beans