how would u fix this style of animation

>>149121308 (OP)
Give it more edges. And violence

>>149121308 (OP)
burn it.

why change it?

bankrupt the studio that makes it
chicken jockey!

>>149121308 (OP)
I'd retire it and go back the the style of humans they'd been doing for stuff like Inside Out and the newer Toy Story movies. It's pretty clear that this sort of style isn't very popular with audiences and probably contributed to Elbert in Space or whatever it was called flopping.

>don't give characters huge round ears and noses that make them look like goblins
>stop making limbs look like sausages
>don't make teeth perfectly square blocks
>don't make eyes almost perfect circles
And most importantly
>stop mixing simplistic designs with hyperrealistic textures

>>149121308 (OP)
Time travel to the past Terminator style and kill the source with extreme prejudice. What was the first /co/ show with this type of artstyle, anyway?

>>149121481
it can be traced back to flapjack

>>149121481
Osomatsu Kun

>>149121308 (OP)
Starve it at the box office until a better style comes along.

>>149121308 (OP)
Force the animators to be more spum-pilled Total Beanmouth Death.

>>149121308 (OP)
>People were hating bean mouth even before Pixar adopted this style
>Artists and employees defend it, referencing Aardman, clearly trying to play coy to this visual garbage that'd been infecting 2D animation for a decade already
>Literally every Pixar film that uses bean mouth flops

They were warned literally half a decade ago, but they pushed fives years of movies with this style.

>>149121308 (OP)
remove all women in the workforce

>>149121308 (OP)
I'd try to emulate 2d imagery as much as possible. I wouldn't show any unflattering angles, and I'd go so far as to dramatically morph the face depending on the angle of the camera like Dragon Ball Fighterz does to preserve that 2D look.

At that point, we might as well just draw the whole thing in 2D, but I don't want to because I like working with 3d and I don't like drawing.

>>149121308 (OP)
I think Pixar just needs to lay off human characters for a while. Focus on anthropomorphic characters instead.

If they absolutely have to have humans, then try to make them adults. Because you can get away with more angular facial features on adults. Dracula's face in Hotel Transylvania is basically just a diamond shape with an angular pointy nose. Drac's silhouette is very angular as well.

An angular face and frame feels more memorable than a blobby bean face. I should be able to tell who the character is from just the silhouette. Meilin and Elio are pretty much the same from the silhouette.

>>149121355
>>stop mixing simplistic designs with hyperrealistic textures
This is so annoying, it's obvious they weren't made to be together.

>>149121308 (OP)
Depends. What do you think is wrong with it?

>>149121308 (OP)
Aww, they are very cute and amazing.

>>149121308 (OP)

>>149121308 (OP)
I mean isn’t this style like already dying? Beanmouth shows like Primos and StuGo are dying after one season and Pixars upcoming films like Hoppers and Gato are moving away from this style. Even fucking redditors are waking up to how bad this style is based on this comment section:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cartoons/comments/1lhsbbp/pixars_current_art_style_debate/
The only thing that I fear will revive it is the fact that we’re getting revivals of the four biggest 2010s Cartoon Network shows.

>>149122739
Change the head shapes and they look normal

>>149121678
Based AF, you think the people working on stiff garbage like StuGo are enjoying their job? They aren’t.

We need more cartoons like modern SB that give cartoonists artistic freedom and are actually fun to work on, GET RENPILLED BEANMOUTH LOVERS

>>149121308 (OP)
>fix
The solution is to get rid of it

>>149121308 (OP)
Get rid of writers . Nobody has interest on pre teen dealling with body change, aceptance, and first love... unless you are a pedo. everything is too safe and sanitazed . Advise a cool and frightening villain is good start

>>149121355
It's crazy how much cuter Mei is in 2D compared to 3D

>>149122917
Drawings aren’t people

I still think Mei is cute. CUTE!!

theres nothing wrong with this art style its just being over done.

>>149122960
this is revolting

>>149123182
Yes, it’s wrong

Post your cartoon, OP.

>>149123240
Retard

>>149122960
>beanmouth tumblr shading
calarts has been a disaster for the animation industry

>>149121308 (OP)
Controversial opinion: I prefer this over Disney's huge watery eyes uguu style which only worked in Zootopia and Moana.

>>149123505
It worked in Tangled fine though

>>149123505
Shut taste

>>149123524
Thing is, I fucking hate Tangled, and I fucking hate Frozen. Tangled felt like a prototype of Disney 3D movies, I can't remember any song, the animal sidekick trope was really obvious and stupid here with the out of place no point chameleon, the animation was often awkward, and I hate how the villain was relatable in her fear of dying yet gets literally murdered by one of the protagonists. Not accidental or something. Literally hands-on murdered.

>>149123505
You're retarded

>>149123881
>is, I fucking hate Tangled, and I fucking hate Frozen
That's fine. Tbh I never really liked Frozen, every other song besides 2 were really forgettable so I get where you're coming from, same with Tangled's songs if I'm being honest but I vastly prefer the art direction of the latter.
>Tangled felt like a prototype of Disney 3D movie
That's because they sunk a lot of money into it and it ended up being successful, so in a way it became a blueprint for their later movies both in look and writing but like poor imitations. None of their movies since Tangled have looked quite as nice.

>>149121519
Yeah but in old anime they had cels and the show had unique poses.
Kinda like Asari Chan.
Also I don't hate beanmouth if it's used sparingly, it's just when every fucking character has the same design it sucks ass.

its too 'safe' and awful.

>>149121519
Not /co/ retard

>>149123971
It is though.
The new episode of TADC had a Japanese guy storyboard on it so it's allowed now.
Unless you wanna make a thread of TADC in to prove me wrong then go ahead.

>>149123971
It is though.
The new episode of TADC had a Japanese guy storyboard on it so it's allowed now.
Unless you wanna make a thread of TADC in /a/ to prove me wrong then go ahead boy.

>>149123991
It’s still /co/

>>149124001
Nope I was told if a Japanese person worked on it, it was /a/ so I don't wanna hear anybody complain about anime being posted here ever again.

>>149121308 (OP)
No more 70IQ skull shapes.

>>149122960
There are no characters that look better in 3D. The concept art for CG characters ALWAYS looks better.

>>149121308 (OP)
>see complaint about animation style
>looks inside
>wildly different character models, rigs, facial animation, color palettes, proportions, posing, motion blurring, squash and stretch...

>>149121308 (OP)
Take the people telling people to draw it, and fire them

>>149121308 (OP)
It would work on 2d specially for the lolis.

>>149121308 (OP)
Grubhub perks gives you deals on the food you love

>>149121510
Really? Aside from the original Donkey Kong, Wallace & Gromit, and a few random anime scenes here and there as mentioned in >>149123964, the first /co/ I noticed with beanmouth were Adventure Time and Fish Hooks in 2010. Coincidentally, both shows premiered in months apart from each other that year.

As for Flapjack, I've read that its humor, animation, framing, and tropes inspired shows like Adventure Time, Regular Show, and Gravity Falls. However, beanmouth smiles themselves weren't noticeable in Flapjack in 2008 compared to Adventure Time and Fish Hooks in 2010.

As for Wallace & Gromit, I read that a short called A Grand Day Out debuted in the UK in 1989, but that's nearly a 20-year gap between that and Flapjack's 2008 debut on CN. Also, AFAIK A Grand Day Out wasn't available the US until the 2000s and The Curse of the Were-Rabbit got an American release in 2005.

>https://gamerant.com/cartoon-network-series-surreal-hilarious/

>>149124008
Kys weebtroon

>>149121308 (OP)
Turning Red's artstyle is so goddamn creepy, idk how they're allowed to get away with it

>>149123953
I wont complain about the look in general because whatever they deliver usually looks great. But I dont like their Disney princess faces, they look better on Judy.

>>149125130
Creepy isnt what comes to mind for me, unless you had your awakening with that movie. Its okay. Embrace it. You'll be welcome in the Hilda threads.

>>149121308 (OP)
I could learn to live with this aesthetic if the writing wasn't so garbage.

>>149121308 (OP)
I wouldn't change turning red's style cause the girls were sexy and I'm tired of pretending otherwise

>>149121308 (OP)
>Turning Red was inspired by Ranma 1/2 according to the director herself
>No female nudity as in visible nipples and bare asscracks in the movie at all

>>149125318
Shame on her

>>149121308 (OP)
You don’t.
Calarts style is so unbelievably oversaturated and ugly.

>>149125053
I mean I like Flapacks style there are some moments in it where you can see the beanmouth style beginning to sprout. You can see it in some of Alex Hirsch’s scenes (he would go onto create Gravity Falls and completely deny the fact that the beanmouth style still exists on Xitter, fucking moron)

Honestly regarding this image I wish that modern cartoons still let board artists styles shine through, literally the only cartoon that does it these days is modern SpongeBob and The Patrick Star Show, which is one of the many reasons why I feel that those shows expressive animation is underappreciated.

>>149125318
Based

>>149121308 (OP)
Make more movies like Tangled.

>>149125333
Very shameful

>>149123505
Faggot

>>149121308 (OP)
>>149121311
Big Mouth solution. Use it for very rude and vulgar storytelling, to contrast the aesthetic

>>149121308 (OP)
Not giving them fucking ogre teeth

>>149121308 (OP)
copy nortubel art style