I think there's two types of men that are into girl failures:
1.) The type of man who sees an easy woman. She doesn't have her life straight, and he can either take advantage of that, or "fix" her.
2.) The kind of man who's ALSO a failure, and so they'd know how to talk to someone who's similarly down and out. If Fiona was some businesswoman, he'd have no chance with her. But Fiona being a bum is perfect because the man is ALSO a bum, so he'd know exactly what to say and do with her.
4chan Search
7 results for "a638121e136a98800c69303d9cac6ffc"
>>151161909
The genie was likely in the lamp for thousands of years. Making him work a minimum wage job will allow him to make money and earn life skills like work ethic. If you just made him rich, he could blow through all of the money. Make him a CEO and he could ruin a company and everyone working there could get laid off. But making him flip burgers will allow him to appreciate every dollar, learn how to run a business, and learn how to deal with people.
All in all, I think its a good wish, one the genie would come to appreciate.
The genie was likely in the lamp for thousands of years. Making him work a minimum wage job will allow him to make money and earn life skills like work ethic. If you just made him rich, he could blow through all of the money. Make him a CEO and he could ruin a company and everyone working there could get laid off. But making him flip burgers will allow him to appreciate every dollar, learn how to run a business, and learn how to deal with people.
All in all, I think its a good wish, one the genie would come to appreciate.
>>150853638
This stuff makes me want to make some "progressive" show, and use all of the progressive language, but make it sneakily based or include things that push on the boundaries these people set up.
Like, I want to have society that's a feminist utopia and polyamory is encouraged and even expected, but when you look at it, its husbands with two wives and its clear women are treated as some kind of property in every way but name. The people talking about the place will build it up as something huge and progressive, but its clearly based on the middle east and what not.
I would like to see if people would have the courage to call that out, or if they would continue to say its good for the world that such media exists.
This stuff makes me want to make some "progressive" show, and use all of the progressive language, but make it sneakily based or include things that push on the boundaries these people set up.
Like, I want to have society that's a feminist utopia and polyamory is encouraged and even expected, but when you look at it, its husbands with two wives and its clear women are treated as some kind of property in every way but name. The people talking about the place will build it up as something huge and progressive, but its clearly based on the middle east and what not.
I would like to see if people would have the courage to call that out, or if they would continue to say its good for the world that such media exists.
Is it possible to purposely make an "autism magnet game" like Touhou or Sonic? I'm talking something where people get very attached to the characters and make their own fanon and shit
undertale feels like it came kinda close but not quite and i wonder why
undertale feels like it came kinda close but not quite and i wonder why
>>150230811
>>150230861
The ideal MAD show would have to be something like Simpsons where its okay "for families", but not afraid to show things like cursing or push the envolope. You can't really do satire and parody while being constrained. I mean, you can, but it'll be much more difficult.
Simpsons could have swearing, gore, jiggling breasts, and it was still funny without seeming tryhardy and what not. Cartoon Network could benefit from a show like that.
>>150230861
The ideal MAD show would have to be something like Simpsons where its okay "for families", but not afraid to show things like cursing or push the envolope. You can't really do satire and parody while being constrained. I mean, you can, but it'll be much more difficult.
Simpsons could have swearing, gore, jiggling breasts, and it was still funny without seeming tryhardy and what not. Cartoon Network could benefit from a show like that.
>>149377112
Murder, that is the unprompted killing of another person, is always bad. People conflate killing with evil, and that's wrong, but there's really no argument for just murdering someone.
>What if they wronged me? Because I should be able to do whatever I want if they wronged me!
I'd only agree with you if you'd be okay on the opposite side of that situation. That is to say, if someone said "you wronged me, prepare to die!", your only response would be "Okay."
Murder, that is the unprompted killing of another person, is always bad. People conflate killing with evil, and that's wrong, but there's really no argument for just murdering someone.
>What if they wronged me? Because I should be able to do whatever I want if they wronged me!
I'd only agree with you if you'd be okay on the opposite side of that situation. That is to say, if someone said "you wronged me, prepare to die!", your only response would be "Okay."
>>149121308
I'd try to emulate 2d imagery as much as possible. I wouldn't show any unflattering angles, and I'd go so far as to dramatically morph the face depending on the angle of the camera like Dragon Ball Fighterz does to preserve that 2D look.
At that point, we might as well just draw the whole thing in 2D, but I don't want to because I like working with 3d and I don't like drawing.
I'd try to emulate 2d imagery as much as possible. I wouldn't show any unflattering angles, and I'd go so far as to dramatically morph the face depending on the angle of the camera like Dragon Ball Fighterz does to preserve that 2D look.
At that point, we might as well just draw the whole thing in 2D, but I don't want to because I like working with 3d and I don't like drawing.