>>149729507
>overall looked visually ugly
None of it looked 'ugly' - unless you want to point to specific examples, far too many people here would have seen the movie by now and everyone else will by the end of August once the pirate sites get a clear rip from VOD.
The pocket universe didn't need to look like space and be dark and the 'river' was ugly and a little conceptually idiotic but you also just claimed that you liked the ending, which largely took place in that environment.
>Superman can't crack $600 million
>Obviously Spider-Man, Doomsday/Secret Wars, and Batman 2 will do well
Superman's legs have been as good as they should have been given the word of mouth, but it's only on day 27 as of end of theater business today and it should still end August over $600; BNW made an additional $20M+ dollars just in domestic dollars, between it's 26th day and it's last day, and Superman will easily match that.
SM IV will, potentially, not do as well in the same way JW Rebirth 'did well' but didn't do as well as the previous three reboot movies, and in the same way the immediately previous Jurassic movie (while still 'doing well' - didn't make as much money as the other earlier two reboots. The Batman 2 will be interesting and it's hard to intelligently comment on something when we don't even have a teaser or set photos or casting like we do from SM IV.
People who think an Avenger's crossover film will be a success, especially because Disney is stupid enough to offer to pay RDJ $40M just to show up with an additional $20-40M if it does well, are deluding themselves in the same way people were saying First Step or Superman was going to make a billion (or JW Rebirth would as well) earlier this spring or even last winter.
