"500 posts and no new thread" edition
Previous >>11332342

>>11335471 (OP)

>>11335472

I was gonna make the next thread but welp, got beaten to it. Here's the pic I intended for it lol.

>>11335476

New-ish butt knight pic. Any TL would be appreciated.

if anybody knows of some decent artists up for commissions right now (language not that much of a concern), lemme know

>>11335480
Anyone got a translation?

>>11335490
There's a few up on skeb but it depends on how much you want to spend or how long you're willing to wait.

Wat do?

>>11335471 (OP)
Only posting again because I like how it turned out considering my skill level. And because I posted it at the end of the last thread at page 10 like a bozo.

>>11335495
keep being a bad girl so mommy keeps putting me in time out in her bra or front panty
need more content like this with mom and tiny daughters

>>11335494
What is Rems' maximum height so far?

>>11335519
Rough guess would be 160 feet, but I normally am not too specific on heights during comms.

>>11335471 (OP)
would you do as she orders?

>>11335524
>Painted toenails
Kindly get fucked

>>11335528
Are painted toenails like ugly tattoos to foot fetishists or something?

>>11335511
You will get put in the back of the panties

>>11335524
No. I can't take anyone with lightning eyes seriously, I just think of the LowTierGod meme.
>Worship and shrink
If shrinking is the reward, what's the punishment for refusing?

Now with young Pauline, a new era of loli gts feet will fall upon us.

>>11335529
IDK, maybe nail polish tastes bad?

Anyone else feel like we dont get many of those fuckhuge giantess stories with ensemble characters anymore?
Like the type of stuff ThomThumb or Duggernaut used to write?

I was re-reading My Marriage to a Giantess and I forgot how much I liked these unnecessarily long stories

>>11335503
I was gonna get to yours but I'm a bit busy, I'll make time to finish this request list later.

I LOVE GIANTESS YURI
I love big sisters gently doting on their tiny little sisters
I love giant hags unintentionally humiliating tiny young ladies with their giant sweaty boobs and gassy MILF butts
I love giant monstergirls teasing and seducing tiny girls with their hot slimy mouths and tongues
tiny girls are CUTE
big ladies are SEXY and BEAUTIFUL
I want to see them together

>>11335538
Maybe she grows instead of you shrinking? Could be a punishment for shrinking fans.

>>11335503
Not bad.

>>11335524
source for this one?

I want to be tiny so fucking bad bros.

I don't.

>>11335480
Perhaps one of the greatest size OCs there is. Seconding TL request

>>11335548

I have an outline for a super long story, it's going to be a very character driven slice of life about the college experience. It started as an idea of what if a guy was an RA for an all girls wing and had this gene where some of the girls in his wing had a matching gene that could make him shrink.
The story has grown more and more expansive.
I've planned out a lot of character arcs, e.g. when one of the characters losing his parents and grandparents in a car crash.

I wanted to capture the experience of college. I know that some people won't want to read it because it's not just smut, and that's fine. It's become more for me to understand life than anything else.

But, one day I'm going to release it and it will genuinely be an insanely long story. I have plans for 8 semesters worth of plots and character arcs.
It's low priority right now, and I want to have written enough to have a regular release basis when it's done. So, honestly probably it won't be even this decade.
At best, I'm hoping to have a decent-sized (pun not intended) Christmas themed love-story novella out next year. I have a ton going on in my life, and right now my priority is non-giantess writing. But, one day, you will have your hella long story to read anon.

Consider: Dokuro-Chan with size changing powers

>>11335644
>only giantess that makes sense for murderfaggotry and destruction because she can just resurrect the MC as many times as she wants
>pictured not using her club to kill him
one job.
still an incredibly bewilding anime with the future being lolibabas.

>>11335644
>Bludgeoning Angel Dokuro-chan (2005)
You’re still here old man…?

>>11335511
>manga artist draws god tier cakes
>gets asked to do a size series
>gets annoyed that the size series barely has any interaction between the tinies and hot cakes
>draws a bunch of "what ifs" based on what he wanted to draw

Such a shame that series was intended to be a massive multi-media project with an anime in addition to the WN and manga but the manga was so terrible it all got canned.

Tinies are for friends and lewds.
>>11335631
Sex with Nessa's soles. I wish there was more stuff with a giant Olivia. That choco mommy is so good.

>>11335662
I'm more partial to Lenora, who also has next to nothing. Tragic!

>>11335659
>draws a bunch of what ifs
That picture isn’t even from the artist IIRC and while he did draw a vore pic I don’t recall any others. Do you have the sauce for the other pics?

>>11335664
Hnnng. Playful and teasing big gals are my favorite. And, those feet are so meaty. If I was in that situation, I would keep having to restart from nutting.

>>11335490
Slippers are massively underrated

I started playing Needy Streamer Overload and I got her to start talking about otaku shit during her streams, which in turn made her start talking about kaiju movies and how she wants to grow into a giant and step on schools. It's one of those totally unexpected giantess moments that makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck. A chronically-depressed, drug addicted, self-harming giantess with a grudge against normies and schools would be pretty neat.

>>11335480
How many home runs can she hit?

I am formally requesting giantess content of the Visa/Master card chan lolis

>>11335704
I too, while reading alone, often say "What a nice book..." aloud to myself.

Last few chapters have got unexpectedly kinky

>>11335728
Shut up and get in the slipper, little man

>>11335736
Whilst giantess elves wearing tiny people as adornments is top-tier content, I still need to ask what the fuck is even going on with Ojou-sama?

>>11335717
So much this. Giant jirai menheras have tons of unexplored size potential utilizing tiny people alongside their self-destructive habits.
On that note, shame there isn't much size art of Ame specifically out there, compared to KAngel. I preferred her design and obvious mental instability more lol

>>11335752
>>11335717
you're basically fetishizing 3DPD at this point
kys

>>11335524
No, they listen to me. They need to be grossed out by worship

>>11335736
this is lewd as fuck holy shit

>>11335749
This is the latest of the 8 big bads.

>>11335791
They've all been befriended so far haven't they? Looks like Mine is going to 'fight' her next chapter, guess her power makes her immune to shrinking.

>>11335752
Oh totally, a landmine-type girl eating tinies on a stream while being too drugged out of her mind to even realize that she's not eating candy is a particular fantasy of mine.

>>11335552
Take as much time as you need bbg.
>>11335568
This is only after ~4 months of serious (But still rather lazy to be honest) practice, imagine what I'll be able to do in a year.

>>11335579
The artist is Nanoscopic AKA 2Lewd. The character is his OC, Alice.

>>11335647
To be fair she doesn't need to use her club to revive him, like in the intros she blows him up with a rocket launcher or kills him with a flamethrower.

I hate giant bitches

>>11335736
>>11335790
"Accessorizing with tinies" has to be one of the most underrated Giantess subfetishes.

>>11335770
Willing tinies really aren't fun at all. They should be aroused, but mentally know that their situation is undesirable...

anyone know the twitter of miton?cant find it

>>11335957
Its best when the mere presence of big girl scent exposure/smothering drives even the most reluctant tiny wild, mental conditioning is one of my favorite aspects of size shit.

>that old honey lounge doujin where a girl keeps getting guys that confess to her addicted to the scent of her panties even though they shrink when they smell her.

can't believe they never did something like that again.

When you think about it, isn't shrinking straight-up body horror? Sure you don't really think about it that way since I'd probably be too busy getting sat on by my sister and farted on for her amusement, but once it really settles in that this is your new permanent size it's fucking horrifying, on a level that straight up alienates you in a strange way from your own body.

>>11335957
>Willing tinies really aren't fun at all. They should be aroused, but mentally know that their situation is undesirable...
That's my favorite thing.
The idea of me blushing at the situation, but still, for example, being grossed out by being woken up at 6:00 AM by my giantess captress to worship her sweaty feet before she steps in the shower.

Hating being kept in a birdcage on display, back hurting from sleeping on the hard surface (or even lightly padded with like newspaper or something), but still blushing as she picks me up and deposits me under her booty.

>>11335978
Sounds like I don't have to ever work again, which is a win for me.

>>11335992
Lucky bitch, my sister would be making me do menial bullshit like drag her socks from all the way across the floor and put them on her feet

I have always wanted to make a giantess/growth game but even after thinking of many concepts its just so hard to balance the idea of power fantasy and actually making a game that doesnt get boring in 5 minutes. Regardless of playing a tiny or as a giantess.

It definitely would have to be a roguelike(or lite) game because if you get new powers and so on the growth scenario will have infinite possibilities and lots of replayability.

Any ideas on how to approach an actually fun to play game with this idea?

>>11335996
There was a game from a while ago that basically was teased as you being a survivor during a monster attack on a city and you had to navigate the city to escape.

>>11335478
You would not be able to see her entire ass from that perspective

>>11335957
>willing is undesirable
Whoa there buddy, did you get Mastercard's permission to have an interest in non-consensual content?

>>11335957
What about tinies who were broken into being submissive and willing? Defiant, head strong person being shrunk, hell bent on turning back to normal and getting revenge. But weeks into constant abuse and degrading whenever they act up makes them start to believe that they aren't human anymore. By a month in they practically act like an excited puppy begging for attention and love the girl they vowed revenge against weeks prior

>>11335736
MUUUUUH DIIIICK

>bunch of animators I like seem to have collectively burnt out recently
>Lajest is only semi-active
>Eelrein seems promising

Anyone find any other good animators recently? There's been a dearth of content on that front

>>11336043
sliceofsize, benevolentbunny, hollewdz, tail-blazer

>>11336051
>Hollewdz
Anon...

I just think it's hot when you have a Morticia and Gomez Adams relationship where both characters want to constantly be in each other's pants.

>>11335999
'City Shrouded in Shadow', it's a spinoff of the Disaster Report games, which is one of the funniest kusoge series out there. they're mostly funny for seeing what ridiculous deaths and leaps of logic the devs came up with

>>11336020
No, watcha gonna do abo

>>11335554
>I LOVE GIANTESS YURI
alright, lets see what we're dealing with...
>I love big sisters gently doting on their tiny little sisters
bland as described, if you add teasing it gets a lot better but you didnt so
>I love giant hags unintentionally humiliating tiny young ladies with their giant sweaty boobs and gassy MILF butts
lost a lot of points at gassy but the rest is extremely based so you get a one-time pass, dont waste it
>I love giant monstergirls teasing and seducing tiny girls with their hot slimy mouths and tongues
very based
>tiny girls are CUTE
>big ladies are SEXY and BEAUTIFUL
agreed on all counts
>I want to see them together
you get a 7/10 based rating from me

Anyone here post giantess OCs or is that too autistic for this thread?

>>11335978
It's why shrinking is best suited for horror or slice of life. Though the slice of life stuff just boils down to being an episode of Hamtaro. Sorry to hear about your bitch sister.

>>11336043
I hesitate to suggest him, but BikiniZero is certainly unique. He's an animator, and everything is styled to look like it was shot on an old video camera, or crappy 2000's video camera. Genuinely unique in that respect, but some of his stuff is a little too raw, even for me.

>>11336051
Bro is living in the 2010s if he's suggesting Hollewdz

>>11336266
>BikiniZero
They are one of a few rare size 3D animation artists who improved their render quality in a breakneck pace, I quite like their stuff.
And as for some of their stuff being too raw - for an ultra degenerate like me, everything they put out is still quite vanilla.

>>11335978
It's not body horror, it's existential horror

>>11336143
Fuck off.

>>11335503
Love giant Touhous. Keep it coming!

>>11336143
Too autistic, finish your game first nigger

>>11336372
Need giant mommy.

>>11335927
based

>>11336225
Slice of life with a big lady is better

>>11336225
>>11335957
this is exactly why i like unwilling shrink the best,its slice of life for her and horror for the tiny, her every movement during her day without her even trying is an inescapable horror episode for the tiny,

>>11336438
>its slice of life for her and horror for the tiny
Great explanation. The difference in perspective is what makes it great.

>>11336447
i don't have very many examples but i really like pics where the girl is talking to someone and misdirecting them as to their victims location is really hot

>>11336449
Don't worry anon, I got you.

Put em to sleep Doremi

>>11336460
i've really been liking djqn's work because they do that scenario a lot

what's your opinion on giant special forces?
how effective would they be?

Big sweaty saltnigger

>>11336134
Big sisters teasing their beloved little sisters is a given, but it's very gentle teasing. Just enough to make them giggle or pout, not turn them into a blushing, horny, disheveled mess
You can replace "gassy" with "fat" (or a synonym) if you can't handle the true power of a mature woman's digestive system. The tiny ladies caught in the path of her big booty will thank you

>>11335662
This bitch's feet are made of jello

>>11336024
I'm a little more partial to defiance>ego death pipeline myself. Where the tiny's defiance is repeatedly crushed and their self worth destroyed to the point all they can do is try not to think too hard about all their failed escape attempts or all the things they miss from their old life or the things they wanted to do in the future.

>>11336512
>UN
>Doing anything
Most unbelievable part of this image.

>>11336571
>Giant girl rips the roof off your house
>"Anon it's time for your corn syrup"

>>11336512
Kino for dumb, fun settings or settings that don't take themselves too seriously. That way, you can have things like Mount Lady fighting alongside/with Spoder Man and the Punisher. If you want to be >realsitic or >gritty, then you would have to deal with "extreme autism territory" level stuff.

I wish giantess vs mech settings were more common. I'm so fucking tired of mech tards pretending their settings are 'realistic', a mech is about as plausible as a combat giantess, and watching their precious little mech pilots get ripped out of their mechs and stuffed down a giantess's buttcrack is precisely what they deserve.

>>11336583
The trouble with gts vs mech is that fundamentally, mechs are still made of steel and gun whereas giantesses will fundamendally be made out of flesh and blood and sugar and spice and everything nice. I do not think I could plausibly win a standup fight against a human sized armor reinforced gun platform even with the weakness of being piloted by a hand sized psychopathic retard if said retard happens to have good aim. Tanks are tank shaped for a reason but even a tank that isn't tank shaped will still have more gun in its gun than I can carry in my hands.
The legacyverse guy probably put more thought into this than I have and all that but to me combat giantesses only make sense if they're naturally occurring giantesses and not if science had to go out of its way to engineer them.

>>11336587
>mechs are still made of steel and gun whereas giantesses will fundamendally be made out of flesh and blood and sugar and spice and everything nice
If we are talking about giantesses which are at least 30ft tall, then the force that allows them to overcome the square-cube law and be as agile as normal humans, would give them durability (+ strength and force projection) orders of magnitude higher than any materials known to men.

>>11336587
i think >>11336592 definitely has a point, sure you might not be able to fight a human sized mech but when you scale things up, the mech will be made out of the same materials / somewhat better ones, but will not be able to withstand an equivalent force as easily as their smaller counterparts

>>11336583
>>11336587
>Mechs take tens thousands of man hours to build and maintain, relatively slow and immobile and need lots of them to not become easy prey
>Elves just throw on a skintight powersuit and use a prybar (optional)
>Enormous cost of building mechs keeps human R@D in the pits
>Elves easily develop lots of new advancements that make humans easier and easier targets
>Elf-Human space war gradually becomes more and more of a bughunt as humanity desperately tries to keep morale up with images of big mechs as elves begin to view them less as threats and more as walking vending machines

>>11336583
I need a nerdy weedy giant space elf invader completely red in the face as she pulls out a chadly human pilot from his mech cockpit

>human is freaking out staring at the blank faced invader after hearing so many horror stories about what happens to humans that are captured from his war buddies
>elf girl is frozen up fantasizing about a life together with a dude that fits in her palm in an active warzone

>>11336594
>will not be able to withstand an equivalent force as easily as their smaller counterparts
That's not really what I meant, but your point is also valid.
In my view, the giantess strength won't be simply scaled with her size, it would be additionally enhanced by that "giantess power" that allows giantess to exist. And this enhancement scales much faster with girl's size than a simple size scaling you are talking about. But yeah, even if that "giantess power" didn't give the girl extra strength, her mere weight would allow her punches to smash concrete, steel, etc.

>>11336512
I think giantesses would be very useful for search and rescue, counter insurgency or other small scale (para)military operations but they are too big and vulnerable to be useful in conventional warfare

Did the gentle thread remerge here or does no one give a shit anymore

>>11336583
But nobody thinks mechs are realistic they're science fiction. I started thinking about mech vs. giantess stuff in my head after reading this post and I ran into a problem that it is really hard for me to justify the mechs existence without making them win sometimes and I don't want them to win.

>>11336602
I'm assuming it died gentle was super slow.

>>11336587
Literally every single mech setting that was ever made relied on some pseudo-science to justify it. Just do that, but for giantesses.

Also does anyone have the rest of these pics >>11336583 right there? I can't find them anywhere.

>>11336583
I ran a sci-fi campaign where giantesses and mechs fought with and against each other and tanks and infantry, and nobody gave a shit about this "realism" people speak of.
The players who liked being the tiny party were mech pilots, and the ones who liked being giant played as giantesses, the giant got to stomp tanks and infantry, and the pilots got to eject and run from rival giant mercenaries

>>11336601
>but they are too big and vulnerable to be useful in conventional warfare
The big part is true, but definitely not vulnerable, unless they are mini 8 ft tall giantesses. Starting from 50 ft they become basically nuke-proof.

>>11336592
>30 feet
Brachiosaurs were 40 feet tall and weighed 50 tons, with the very dangerous constraint of their heads being ~25 feet away from their hearts so their arteries had to pump for a brain that was ~20 feet above in the vertical. The Earth didn't have quite as much gravity back then as it has now due to space dust but we should still assume the gravitational differences to be negligible. Brachiosaur feet were around 1 meter wide (https://www.amnh.org/explore/news-blogs/largest-dinosaur-foot-study) so that weight was carried across ~3 square meters if brachiosaurus walked with 3 feet on the ground at all times.

If we assume a body with fit-male-equivalent bone and muscle density, ~200lbs at 6', size 12 feet (30 square inches roughly), then scaling up to 30' would be a factor of 5^3 and result in ~12.5 tons of weight, carried across ~0.5 square meters during a walking step, with a heart-to-head distance of only about 6-7 feet. If we assume science-fantasy conventions such as biometals reinforcing bones in a way similar both to rebar in concrete and to the wasps that have biometal-reinforced stingers, and assume unnatural muscle that allows for both maximum power and human-equal twitch speed, then those unnatural bio enhancements would need to triple the human body density to match the total mass of the brachiosaur. The footprint size and shape strain of the foot is the big problem with regards to support of the weight, nothing particularly wrong with an upright form apart from that. Footfags would be the big losers in a square cube adjustment scenario. There would also be an immediate problem regarding oversized human eyes, and the material of the skin.

>>11336602
Sorry about that. I'm the only one posting the gentle threads and I left on vacation right before the last thread got archived. There's a new one up now.

>>11336583
I actually find it way hotter when the mech is supposed to be some super cool badass thing that just gets casually crushed by a giantess honestly I would find a lot more gts scenarios way better if the tiny way replaced by a mech

>>11336624
I think if there was a goal to match brachiosaur weight for some reason, adding a few more feet to a giantess size would be a much better solution. Or just use a giantess who is as chunky as a brachiosaur, then they would match both in height and weight, without modifying density. We don't even need to ask a hyper giantess, a simple morbidly obese one would be enough.

>>11336636
that vid would be great if it wasn't ocslop

>>11336636
Is this lajest? Don't remember this one

>>11336638
I don't really care about that as long as this kind of stuff gets to show up more

>>11336640
Yeah they uploaded it a few months back

>>11336625
>giantess makes holes in the rain clouds
Insanly cute detail

>>11336637
>I think if there was a goal to match brachiosaur weight for some reason,
The reason being that brachiosaurs were made out of meat and bone, not stuff stronger than Chobham Composite.
A huge part of the argument over square cube dynamics in heavy armored mechs does not apply to giantesses since they would be intrinsically lighter than mechs due to being flesh instead of RHAe-rated composites, the fact that different flesh compositions do exist in nature making some leeway plausible. But, that limitation is only overcome by the same thing that would give the mech greater sci-magical protection; the mech has to be strong enough to move all that metal and fuel and hydraulic systems, whereas the giantess only has to move flesh and blood, but the tradeoff is that if an angered brachiosaur could not plausibly stamp through a given mech's glacis plate then a giantess with one third the brach's mass probably couldn't punch her fist through it either. And a mech with the magic armor to resist another mech's rocket punch would not be stamped through by a brach.
A plate armored battlemaiden would have the same problems as a mech but would not have the intrinsic technomagic implication required to overcome them. The square cube hits thick plate armor harder than flesh due to its relative density. What is required for a giantess to exist as a giantess at all is just what is required to be a flesh being, not what is required to be a metal encumbered flesh being. The much denser mech is overcoming a stronger square cube limitation, operating at a higher level of magic and so the giantess is at a visible disadvantage.

>>11336650
My instincts say you're wrong because a giantess has to have a circulatory system more structural support etc but I don't really care that much

I saw a clip from a recent anime a while back. It was a fantasy anime that had a brainwashed warrior giantess attacking a village and she was HARD VORE eating the villagers. Anyone know what it was called or have a link to the scene?

>>11336685
Vore in media Channel on Youtube

>>11336606

Speaking of "giant" robots


https://www.deviantart.com/varumantt/art/The-Duel-ft-ColossiFlashKingmon-part-one-1189743427
https://www.deviantart.com/varumantt/art/The-Duel-ft-ColossiFlashKingmon-part-two-1198520313
https://www.deviantart.com/varumantt/art/The-Duel-ft-ColossiFlashKingmon-part-three-1219393489

>>11336713
safe horny gentleslop
fuck off

>>11336650
>The reason being that brachiosaurs were made out of meat and bone, not stuff stronger than Chobham Composite.
First - it wouldn't be a Chobham vs Meat. It would be Chobham vs force generated by a huge fucking object. It will be crushed/shattered.
Second, brachiosaurs existed in flesh in bones only due to their shape. Normal human wouldn't be able to exist even starting at 10 ft. That means that each additional foot in their size would require more and more enhancement. By the time we reach giantess size, they would be practically indestructible. In your precious calculations you absolutely neglected this by focusing on absolutely unrelated matters as density and brachiosaur mass. The point is that a 30 ft 12 ton girl, simply using her mass + velocity, would break any composites/alloys, because they will reach their critical point. And that is even without taking into account that this enhancement scales much faster than mass. If we take it into account, by the 30 ft mark, all those alloys will fill like play doh.
>the fact that different flesh compositions do exist in nature making some leeway plausible
Not in humans though. My original point was that giant girls aren't buffed by some kind of flesh/bone transplants or cybernetics, as it obviously won't work even above 20 feet. The point was about supernatural giantess abilities.
>The much denser mech is overcoming a stronger square cube limitation, operating at a higher level of magic and so the giantess is at a visible disadvantage.
That's wrong. Alloys and composites by default have higher critical points, allowing some giant constructions even in real world, so their "magic buff" would be much smaller than the one for the giant girl. Moreover, the giantesses get not just a buff to "exist and not collapse under their weight", but to have an important giantess attribute - being like a scaled version of a normal girl, which requires normal-like agility. In the meantime, mechs don't have such thing.

>>11336583
want more giant girls in power armor

>>11336650
Continuation of >>11336715
The additional buff for the human-like agility exponentially increases both strength (to outpace the cubically increasing weight), but also speed (to match relative human agility/speed, increasing with the volume of the body). The later means that power and projected force are growing at astronomical rates.

>giantess autism vs tank autism
This is the kind of discussion I'm here for desu.

>>11336650
>A plate armored battlemaiden would have the same problems as a mech but would not have the intrinsic technomagic implication required to overcome them.
Why the fuck would a giant girl cover herself with some soft shit like plate armour when she would be much more durable being naked?

>>11336583
This kind of gives me some ideas. Thank you for ranting about this.

need more girls using shrinking spray

>>11336713
I like it! We need more

>>11336606

>>11336713
soul

>>11336583
Giantess vs mech is very hot, particularly when it's a multi-staffed mech like a sentai robot or some kind of militarized mech that needs a crew on the bridge.

There's just this looming dread the tinies must feel that's very titillating. Like "oh shit we'd better not lose or this bitch is gonna yank us out of this mech and make us her toys". The mech is the literal last wall between you and becoming a snack or a squish toy.
Even better if the giantess is just, no armor, no equipment, just a girl in all her natural splendor, and she's such a threat that you need this mech just to be able to stand a chance against her. She's already salivating thinking at what she's gonna do once she cracks open this robot kinder egg and gets her prizes inside it.

>>11336372
I am quite fond of tengu. I really wish good artists (aka almost anyone other than me) would draw more bighus using their ass, thighs, and boobs. most of what I can find are feet and vore.

>>11336723
What if you combined giantess autism and mecha autism- where cool dudes in robots and big sexy women fight giant monstars and eldritch ayys?

>>11336836
Macross is ground zero for couple shit. Fuck off homo.

>>11336849
Brainrot. Seek help.

>>11336826
Aya is a pretty good 10gu and I like what you did with this piece. Don’t sell yourself short either, this ain’t half bad. I can appreciate it at least even if I’m a footfag. Hell, if you want, maybe for your next draw you can have Momiji grabbing and “imprisoning” some trespassing Outsider humans between her boobs?

>>11336826
>draw more bighus using their ass, thighs, and boobs
Any 2hus in particular?

>>11336853
Thanks, I'm probably just too hard on myself is all. As for your suggestion... maybe. I don't draw size stuff or NSFW period very often (As in, last time I did was several months ago, and has since been deleted).

>>11336861
Any of them, honestly. But for me personally, Momiji, Aya, Reimu, Marisa, Yukari, Kagerou, and Ran.

>>11336728
>>11336730
which marushamo is this

>>11336836
I ran a TTRPG campaign that lasted over a year which followed this premise.

>>11336474
I still don't understand Touhou community I swear like 2% of the people in it play bullet hells

>>11336867
You are your own worst critic as the old saying goes. But yeah I hope you don’t let it discourage you. And NSFW or not I still hope to see more from you! Yukari is one of my favs as a related aside.

>>11336912
Once I've got my drawing skills to a point I'm comfortable with for drawing full comics/manga and find a way to publish them, I'm sure you will see me pop up eventually. I've got big plans and stories that I cannot share here or the haters will sabotage me.

>>11336685
>>11336691
Found it. It's Isura. It was hot. The blood on the ground was nice.

>>11336826
Tengus are good

>>11336650
This is the kind of autism I come here for.
God I can't wait for the next /k/ size thread, that shit was a blast.

I like Grok-chan's keister

>>11336919
Nice nice, I’ll try to keep an eye out for you then! Kind of wish you’d tease of spoil us a tad but I understand wanting to keep things under wraps.

>>11336943
I just wanted to say I love the small detail of Hatate’s butt morphing around Reimu and what I think is Sakuya.

>>11336961
Fuck it I'm just gonna tell you anyways.

It's not a whole lot, honestly, I'm planning on starting some touhou fan series, one following Youki Konpaku in early pre-spell card rules gensokyo, and another soft-sequel following an OC outsider related to the first story's antagonist. The big gimmick with all of my works is that I want to put emphasis on realistic martial arts and minimal "magic bullshit" attacks. I've got systems down as well to make it work in touhou lore for the soft-sequel based on ZUN's description of danmaku and the spell card rules, where traditional "bullet hell" danmaku is "feminine" and martial arts based danmaku is "masculine". I'd probably hit the character limit trying to explain how it works. Now there is a chance in the future I can be traced back to a giantess fetish 4chan thread in the future. Very fun.

>>11336933
link?

>>11336715
I'm going to try to back of the envelope this for a bit, please correct errors as appropriate.
https://www.wired.com/2015/08/ufc-fighter-ronda-rousey-physics-based-superpowers/
>This is a speed of about 5 m/s.
I do not at all trust this metric for the energy transferred. I am also not going to assume that a giantess assault on a mech will use the minimal sportswomanly force involved in a nonlethal boxing match. Instead, let's consider our giantess to have planted her left foot and launched a FINAL ATTACKU: HEART CRUSHA PUNCHU, beginning in the quads, transferring half of her bodymass into the blow focused at her fist, with an impact velocity scaled linearly. A 5'7" 135lb rouseylike turned 30 foot, 20,942 lb giantess lands a 27 m/s blow, carrying ~5 short tons. mv^2=9500kg * 27 m/s * 27 m/s = 6.9255 MEGAjoules. That is an absolute fuckton of joules. Maybe this situation would call for torque reading instead I dunno how punches work. All the perforation calculations I see online relate to cylindrical diameters, people typically only really hit with about half of their fist area, let's assume a ~1.5" diameter under normal conditions scales linearly to a giantess punch diameter of ~8", 0.2m.

So, how much concrete could this motivated superdelinquent perforate with such a mighty fisting?
According to this paper:
https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jmr/article/download/5020/6703
>E(cp)/ (fc)(d^3) = 0.174(H/d)^3 + 0.169(H/d)^2 + 0.0577(H/d) + 0.2969 for (0.69 ≤ H/d ≤ 14.86)
I don't believe that we're going to get the depth to diameter ratio specified.
Assuming unconfined compressive strength of 60MPa for concrete:
6.9255MJ/60MPa(0.008 cubic m) = 0.174(H/0.2m)^3 + 0.169(H/0.2m)^2 + 0.0577(H/0.2m) + 0.2969

14131.1=1.392(H^3) + 6.76(H^2) + 288.5(H)

Non-negative: 17.2488 meters concrete perforation.
She's only a bit more than 9 meters tall.

>>11336984
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJobtc-1Nxw

>>11337007
60MPa is about 8700 psi btw.
Modern anti-concrete missiles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-57A/B_MOP
>The MOP is reportedly able to penetrate about 18 m of reinforced concrete with a compressive strength of 5,000 psi.[34][35] Iranian domestic research has produced concrete exceeding 30,000 psi, which could sharply reduce the bomb's effective penetration depth.[33]
The all-or-nothing heartburst punch she's aiming for would be significantly stronger than a modern air force bunker buster if those figures are accurate. Rumors are American munitions tend to underplay their real effectiveness so that adversary states will underinvest and underbuild themselves.

Now, everybody knows that one of the things that makes a mech a mech is the ability to easily defeat the modern United States military and to show up the United States' highest value weaponry and vehicles. But, this does have limits. A mech will outmatch the SR-71 in speed, the F-16 in missile delivery, the U-2 in astronautical recon, the B2 in stealth. But in terms of armor it will not outmatch a missile silo. Mecha armor is measured against the United States M1 Abrams Tank Munitions of Current Year. Every mech is only obligated to be able to shrug off the Abrams' AP round, which is at present the M829 "Silver Bullet," which cannot perforate 17+ meters of reinforced concrete. Hence the need for a dedicated missile capable of same.

Therefore, I concede. A sufficiently motivated delinquent giantess who retains equivalent relative agility to a peak human athlete could outbox the standard, Abrams-defeating mecha. So long as they aren't super wank mecha shown to be able to tank a bunker buster and keep on trucking.

>>11336730
Oh come on, where's Page 33? :P

>>11335717
>>11335752
In my experience, girls like this become so maladapted because they've been extraordinarily powerless in their own lives, and they're constantly cycling between anxiety, depression, and suppressed intense bitterness and anger. It's hard to imagine how they'd react to having size powers: suddenly whiplashing from a life of weakness to extreme power could be incomprehensible to them. Would they be too terrified to do anything? Would they fall into despair now that they've become something inhuman? Or, once they realize that nothing can stop them, will they give into the temptation to stop suppressing their resentment and boiling anger and become sadistic monsters?

I RPed with one such girl. She kidnapped a tiny off the street because she was angry that he was scared of her; she turned on the bathroom faucet and forced him under the hot water pouring out, then ripped his head off, saying that she felt a tension in her mind begin to relax. It was one of the hottest things I saw a girl say.

>>11336512
It would be effective if the Jews didn't control it

>>11337061
Uru's giant Gyaru manga is possibly the best thing he's ever done, I like "oblivious, overly affectionate girl overpowering reluctant tiny" stories.

Bit of a shame he got bored of the giant maid series, would have liked it to shift more in that direction rather than it pivoting to the direction the doujins went.

>>11337071
>Uru's giant Gyaru manga
How is this the first I'm hearing about. I fucking love giant gyarus and the doujin was 10/10

>>11336713
Nice.

Realized it had been a couple months since my last proper giantess drawings and became thoroughly shamed.

>>11337097
>>11337098
Giant Usagi is so good. She can be bratty, teasing, smug, sweet, and lewd.

>>11337061
>Or, once they realize that nothing can stop them, will they give into the temptation to stop suppressing their resentment and boiling anger and become sadistic monsters?
That seems inevitable in this scenario.

>>11336474
Fingerplay is underrated

>>11337022
>A sufficiently motivated delinquent giantess who retains equivalent relative agility to a peak human athlete could outbox the standard, Abrams-defeating mecha
It would be much easier than that.
First, all armor-piercing and bunker-busting munition achieve their penetration performance through a very thin shaped charge - HEAT and it's variants. The giant girl achieves the same level of penetration using her fist, essentially not just penetrating the object, but literally caving it in. That's not the same.
Second, beating M829 wouldn't require a full-power blow, as the latest known variants of it stops at about 800mm of RHA, which would be roughly equal to 8m of concrete.
And finally, taking into consideration all of the above, the giant girl wouldn't even need to do any martial arts in order to deal an equivalent damage. They could have enough force to rip mechas apart, assuming the grip strength got also scaled.
That being said, power and durability of giant girls is directly correlated to their size. And while middle sized mega giantess would have punches with the energy output of tzar-bombs, smaller ones at ~ 10-20 feet would be totally vulnerable to weapons and will most likely lose to an average mecha.

>>11337222
>middle sized mega giantess would have punches with the energy output of tzar-bombs
I fucked up a bit here.
I misremembered the size of mega-type giantess. I thought that they were from 500m to 1km, but they are actually from 1km to 10km. In this case, a powerful strike of the smallest mega giantess would be around 1.525e+18 joules - an order of magnitude more than the total power released by the tzar bomba.

*deafens the allied giantess after the first shot*

>>11337121
She's my go to de facto magical girl for commissions. She can be anything you want her to be and more.

>>11337286
simulated sex acts are borderline couple shit
Fuck off homo

>>11336826
agreed

>>11337007
I fucked up in this calculation, and used her full weight over 10 short tons instead of a touch over 5. That's very bad since the KE equation is KE=1/2mv^2 and I'd specified 5 short tons for that reason with the assumption of a blow having her full weight behind it. At 3.5 megajoules, the cubic equation resolves down to about 12 meters of double reinforced concrete. Still more meters than she is tall.
>>11337222
>First, all armor-piercing and bunker-busting munition achieve their penetration performance through a very thin shaped charge - HEAT and it's variants.
This is true, but the bunker buster is still a 30 ton object at drop and it is a guided missile. The explosive staging and reactions can be expected to add energy rather than reduce it, with the smaller diameter penetrator reducing the denominator in the perforation equation.
>Second, beating M829 wouldn't require a full-power blow, as the latest known variants of it stops at about 800mm of RHA, which would be roughly equal to 8m of concrete.
>And finally, taking into consideration all of the above, the giant girl wouldn't even need to do any martial arts in order to deal an equivalent damage.
Prying, grasping, grappling attacks seem ill advised against robots which frequently use some form of close proximity holdout weapon, e.g. gun fingers or even simple self destruct. Without the apex human and martial arts buffs, her relative strike speed goes down considerably. A typical male's punch is more likely to impact at about 3.7 m/s according to most "punch calculators" I see online. Incorporating max bodymass into a punch requires training and practice.
Assuming only one quarter of the bodyweight, at a 3.7m/s relative punch impact speed:
400m^2/s^2 * 4750kg/4= ~480 kilojoules, rounded far enough up to make the next equation easier.
1000=1.392(H^3) + 6.76(H^2) + 288.5(H)
~3 meters of concrete. Mech wins.

Rodya just the way Dostoevsky intended

>>11337373
>The explosive staging and reactions can be expected to add energy rather than reduce it, with the smaller diameter penetrator reducing the denominator in the perforation equation.
This doesn't contradict my statement about the difference in the effect with the bunker buster having the penetration as the main goal by concentrating on a small area (in case of kinetic application, M829 has a barely 1 inch penetrator diameter) while a giant girls punch penetration is seen as an effect, with much higher overall energy.
>Prying, grasping, grappling attacks seem ill advised against robots which frequently use some form of close proximity holdout weapon, e.g. gun fingers or even simple self destruct.
As stated earlier, forces that not only allow a giant girl to overcome square-cube law, but also let her keep the same agility as a normal human, would increase her durability dramatically. For example, a 30 ft 10 ton girl doing a normal (for her) 3m jump would receive an impact of 10,000 kg × 9.8 m/s2 × 3m = 294kJ. That's a bit more than the kinetic energy released from the F-1 grenade. And this much energy has basically zero effect on the giant girl. For the girl of this size to receive any damage, it would take much more energy than any conventional weapons possess. Our previously calculated attack damage was calculated with only taking scaled weight and speed into the account. That means that when we take into account the increased durability, the equivalent weapons like M829 wouldn't feel like a powerful strike to the giant girl. As shown above, it wouldn't affect her at all.
>~3 meters of concrete. Mech wins.
Taking into consideration the fact that those ~3m are not a simple shape-charge/narrow penetration, the fact that a giant girl would not receive any damage from mecha unless it's equipped with nukes, and the fact that the girl could still use any non-punch attacks that would deal even more damage, I'd sum up that a 30+ ft giant girl wins, no diff.

>>11337177
I'd hope so, but I think it's hard for people so unaccustomed to power to use it against others when they finally get it, especially such overt, physical power like size. Maybe she'll have a situation where she accidentally harms someone more than she expected; after her initial panic at the thought of getting in trouble and making people angry, it slowly dawns on her that nobody can ever punish her for what she does, no matter how upset those people are. She'll realize that even if everyone hates her, she can do whatever she wants, and not only do they have to take it, but she can force the people she feels humiliated and angered her for years to feel what she did. Maybe that would be too good an opportunity for her to pass up.

>>11337430
explain

Giantess mathematics is really boring.

>>11337061
>I RPed with one such girl. She kidnapped a tiny off the street because she was angry that he was scared of her; she turned on the bathroom faucet and forced him under the hot water pouring out, then ripped his head off, saying that she felt a tension in her mind begin to relax. It was one of the hottest things I saw a girl say.

Damn. That's something.

>>11337510
Pleb taste. No wonder people hate you

>>11337510
Consider these death numbers though

>>11337510
I'm way too retarded to understand any of the math but I really enjoy seeing it because it shows how varied the community can be in what they find appealing about the fetish, it's not a bad thing at all imo.

Look man if a normal sized dude like Superman can tank nukes to the face without math explanations, why can't a super giantess?
Besides he already does have hella math explanations anyways.

Now that I think about it, there aren't enough "super" giantesses. They tend to be just regular girls who have become big or are naturally big, and that's the end of it, they don't usually have superpowers on top of it. But I'm like... why not?

>>11337510
it's hard

This is reminding me of that guy a while ago who tried to argue humans could hunt giantess like Mammoths he probably got stomped trying to dig a pitfall or something

I don't care about the power difference or some abstract, new world order super femdom autism. I just want to goon to giant women, saars.
>>11337279
That's what makes her so good. Plus, I just like Usagi in general and would like a woman like that as a gf.

Personally I do love the idea of a superheroine who grows giant getting her powers scaled and amped up proportionally to her size.

But then I like the idea of giantesses having more abilities in general than just being big, like they have deified abilities that make humans fear and respect them as actual gods instead of just large bullies with a height advantage.
They could use this in a beneficial or harmful way, like a giantess who controls lightning offering to power a city for her humans in return for their love and loyalty, or just flinging lightning bolts with playful abandon and terrorizing them that way.

If we wanted that, we would be in the Omnipotence thread two doors down the /d/ catalog

>>11337543
A fic I'm working on has that.
The bigwaifu underestimates how much the growth will increase her power and she accidentally nukes a city.

>>11337555
With a fart?

>>11337510
exponential growth is hot af

proportions are important too...

>>11337543
I like when magic is used to enforce entrapment scenarios and size manipulation magic but I don't really get the appeal of throwing fireballs around. Ex:
>Tiny is forced to do menial chores for giantess and shrinks if he refuses or fails
>Tiny is stuck in infinite cleavage/buttcheek hammerspace
>Giant girl uses telekinesis to drag unwilling tinies to be her toys
>NA's scenarios where girls grow to giga size and crush cities for unfair reasons

>>11336968
Good luck with it man, it sounds interesting. Always kind of wondered about non-Spellcard stuff so this sounds promising based on the premise.

>>11337510
It's kind of fun but it's not what I'd prefer to read when I come to the thread after a day of stressful work.

>>11337533
What can a giantess actually do though? If you hug her hind legs she can't reach you with her fingers, and shes too sluggish to get away while you repeatedly pommel her from behind. If you stand to the side of her hind legs then she won't even be able to hit you with a back kick. If she raises her leg to perform a stomp then all you have to do is back off until she finishes her slam, then move back in to continue punching.

>>11337448
Falling close to that distance is actually something I was going to use to measure the minimum energy required to kill. Jumping energy not have no effect on normal sized women. For example, if one woman were to jump on another woman's head, that could kill the other. People die pretty regularly by slipping in the shower or in the kitchen and hitting their heads on counters, fixtures or furnishings that are at waist height, knee height, or floor height, with floor height being less common than imagined because you typically brace for it.

So I think ~300-400kJ is a good measure for how hard a weapon should kick to kill the girl with a nonpenetrative skull shot, not for a level that she'd be completely invincible against.

There's a bit over 4kJ per gram of TNT equivalent so yeah a hand grenade is not going to cut it at all, neither are a lot of man-portable recoilless rifle munitions, and it will be very impractical for a human infantry team to strap a demolition charge directly to her forehead, she would eat them. But in terms of mecha, well we see mecha outperform modern military armor since their narrative purpose is to be better than the Americans, but their weapons are often categorically different. Lasers and blasters, lightning and psychic energy. I don't have any cross sections on gundams on hand but I'm reasonably sure that any mech self destruct is going to use multiple kilos of TNT equivalent, which would push protracted grappling into lethally dangerous territory for the giantess.

Anyone here with the gundam knowledge to chime in?

>>11337605
Bro thinks battling a giantess is just like battling a Dark Souls boss and not an unstoppable level hazard.

>>11337605
Giantesses are author's pets so they have the thickest plot armor of all time. Sure you could just nuke one, but the artist will just make her grow more after absorbing the energy or something. They defy logic by simply existing so that shouldn't be a surprise.

>>11337605
>>11337615
Why would a giantess be slow?
A fly can't escape being clapped, not unless you're 5 years old and don't know how to swat a fly.

>>11337616
Yes but we're also not immune to spider bites and some other attacks from tiny creatures. Shrink High was right with how broken poison was.

>>11337617
Spider bites won't kill you unless you're fantastically sensitive to them for whatever reason.
I could contrive a billion reasons why "poison" wouldn't work on a giantess. Sheer volume needed. Alien physiology incompatible with what we know. Hell, maybe her skin is too tough or it's made of solid gold and your injector can't penetrate it.
I refuse to entertain this giantess erasure any longer.

>>11337616
Flies are known for being hard to kill due to their speed and reaction time though

>>11337625
They're not hard to kill at all. Unless you have the dexterity of a kindergartner
I've clapped flies mid-air with my bare hands, it's super easy actually

>>11337617
>>11337615
This. I know this is a fetish thread, and that's fine if someone openly admits to getting off to omnipotence or extreme domination/submission. It comes with the fetish due to it being so broad. It's just funny how some people become the equivalent of kids arguing during recess or playfighting.
>No, she's 50 feet tall! A superheated steel beam going through her eye would not kill her! She would deflect it before it ever got close
>No, a psychic can't mind rape a giant woman!
It reminds me of this autist I stumbled upon once that made an oc for erp and regular roleplaying. It was a female character that was the empress of an ayy race, was like 10 feet tall, had psionic powers, and could move and fight like someone in early Dragon Ball Z. He even made a post sperging about people calling her overpowered.
>>11337628
But have you conquered your obesity?

I hate living in a world where it's okay for Goku and Omniman to be overpowered but not a hot giantess

>>11336949
This seems cool, you got a link?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZFcBXdmmSE Senran Kagura gets us

>>11337676
sucks no 7 announcement or full remake of Hipster (updated models and visuals) fighting giant Haruka and the others

>>11337071
Nah man, bring back Elf Princess.

>>11337430
>Giantess rodya
aww yi---

>feet
tch

>>11337533
What's the source on that one? It reminds me a lot of the artist from pic related but unless I'm blind I can't find it on his twitter

>>11337759
https://x.com/Paddy32guan

>>11337606
For some reason you still keep stubbornly thinking that giant girl durability is scaling linearly.
I am repeating myself so many times already, but you still fail to comprehend the simplest of facts. Once again, the force negating the square-cube law is the core of this. For her to maintain the agility of a normal human at 30 ft and 10 tons, her biological materials cannot be simply scaled-up flesh and bone. The forces on her own joints would pulverize them. A simple, agile turn would snap her spine. Her flesh and bone must possess a strength-to-weight ratio and toughness that dwarfs any conventional material, including steel or titanium.
Consider a theoretical human-shaped (with the equivalent skeletal structure) 30 ft "doll" (robot?) made of the strongest alloys and composites known to humanity, it would break it's bones by simply doing things with the level of human agility like walking, quickly moving its limbs or turning the head. That's why all large-size machines are big, chunky and slow, not slick and thin like human bodies.
We aren't talking about scaled-up durability; we're talking about a fundamentally different class of material. No self-destruct would do anything to it, even if the entire energy was directed to a single point instead of dispersing everywhere.
Giant girls aren't just a big targets; the premise requires them to have and additional fiction force to physics. Their durability isn't a function of their size, it's a prerequisite for it. No conventional weapon, from a penetrator to a self-destruct, can harm a being that casually ignores the fundamental laws of physics that would shred any machine man could build at that scale and form.

>>11337782
Yeah and plus giantesses could be monster girls with alien physiology. She could be a giant slime.

>>11337677
Looks slopped

>>11336643

>>11337864

People who enjoy Giantess should be shot. In real life people masturbate to small animals being crushed to death. It's really disturbing.

>>11337887
>In real life people masturbate to small animals being crushed to death. It's really disturbing.
Never enjoyed crush videos with small animals. I like much bigger size difference than that. The ones with crushing small insects, like ants, are very good though, they have about the same size ratio as with the over 100m giantess.

>>11337890
My wife and I are pretty gentle to bugs, but watching her unknowingly crush bugs when we're out definitely gets me mixed feelings.

>>11337890
>>11337896
You guys aren't serial killers are you?

I need to be teachers pet

cleavage entrapment is underrated

>>11337908

>>11337645
Check the filename nyagga https://x.com/dzerofive/status/1940632004367995148/photo/1

>>11337782
NTA but if we scale up the giantess linearly, wouldn't that mean that the force required to kill her would scale up in tune with the square cubed law too, even assuming the tensile/compressive strength of her body increases with the square cubed law too? I'm barely following what's going on here, but I think that was the argument he was making.

Alternatively, while the mathematics of giantess is hot, have we considered the mathematics of shrinking?
>One centimeter tall
>A paperclip weighs as much as a literal ton to you considering the density of steel
>Weakness of your size is exponentially exacerbated by forces you don't even consider
>Regular sized girl is baffled by your inability to lift up almost any small household object despite looking easily liftable at your size, because of the density of things being something we rarely think about with things so small
I rarely see that stuff written in size smut. Only writer I can remember writing about shit like that was JellyTea, and it was hot as fuck details

>>11337930
give me explanations why private military companies are able to enlarge only women?

>>11337887
>/co/
>3D
>off-model
>outrage bait
Going all out huh?

>>11337936
They're genetically modified to be enlarged, and it's easier to modify two X chromosomes than an X and a Y one.
Or the Y chromosome is inherently incompatible with growth tech.
Simple explanations that you don't need to think about too much are the best ones

>>11337930
Love all of these but that one in particular is my favorite.

>>11337958

>>11337959

>>11337935
With giantess growth, her durability would scale much faster than simply in tune with square-cubed law, as we are not simply keeping her alive at this size, but also protecting her body from the forces generated by the normal human agility at this size. And this "normal human agility" factor is really the main driving force here, because at certain size it would even allow giantess to break lightspeed by simply moving, essentially breaking physics. And if we consider even smaller sizes, when she moves at fraction of the lightspeed, the combination of such a heavy object almost instantly accelerating/decelerating to such speeds (by moving her arm or leg), would require an astronomical amount of force to protect her body.
As for shrink mathematics, that is an even deeper rabbit hole, I won't even try going there.

>>11337019
sucks she was crazy
imagine a going on adventures with her

>>11337510
iqlet

>>11337759
source?

>>11338048
It's in the top left corner

Here is a big topic of the day:
WTF happened with the western art styles and why did Japanese manga art style overcame them in terms of attractiveness? Especially considering that modern Japanese art style became how it looks today by being heavily influenced (like over 90%) by the western art. You can easily see that - pre 1900's Japanese art looks absolutely different and I'd even say quite unsightly, 1900-1930's looks like a transitional period with western influence starting to affect them. 1940's - breaking point when you can see a complete disneyification of all Japanese art styles. And yet, it looked like western art styles went in some wrong direction after that.

>>11337676
>senran with canonical growth powers is forgotten once again

>>11338078
Naturalism

>>11338078
My completely unresearched and likely inaccurate take:

Western art and japanese art feature a lot of focus on strong, tough role models (ie superheroes) and by extension muscular realistic builds suitable for gritty tough story settings. Outside of that, where they differ is in the cartooning aspect, specifically what they tend to exaggerate. Western cartooning is mostly aimed at either children or political audiences, and any/all aspects of a character tend to get exaggerated for effect to readily convey the impression a character should give off. Japanese cartooning is aimed at a wide variety of audiences, but the exaggeration is almost entirely focused on neotenous features (e.g., big eyes, cute faces, all anime girls are cats, etc) while the rest is generally handled in a way that is at least somewhat grounded in realism.

The companies/individuals who pioneered a lot of how modern commercial art is done (and the character designs they created) likely had a big and lasting impact that later generations recycle without questioning it because they grew up on it and it's just what cartoons *are* to them.

There's probably also a cultural/legal aspect to it too in that western characters need to be sufficiently distinct from each other (and from reality) to be trademarkable, while japanese characters lean more into common/trope-y features so you get more similarity in terms of design traits across franchises.

>>11337782
>For some reason you still keep stubbornly thinking that giant girl durability is scaling linearly.
No, that's an exponential scaling on durability directly related to the scaling of energy generated by normal human movements. Normal human movements include being killed when you slip and hit your head on a kitchen's stone or metal countertop. That is a normal thing involving normal human movements. Or an untrained palooka who drunkenly manages to hit with a one eighth bodyweight blow.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-38992393

>>11338078
Most western animation is made for kids, and what's made for adults is mostly shock comedies that are meant to look goofy instead of attractive. The idea of being attracted to a cartoon character (let alone a giant one) is still considered pretty weird and abnormal by many westerners.

>>11338101
>Completely ignores the content in my post and repeats the same thing that was already debunked
Well, in this case I won't spend my time on repeating myself again and simply copy the counter:
>I am repeating myself so many times already, but you still fail to comprehend the simplest of facts. Once again, the force negating the square-cube law is the core of this. For her to maintain the agility of a normal human at 30 ft and 10 tons, her biological materials cannot be simply scaled-up flesh and bone. The forces on her own joints would pulverize them. A simple, agile turn would snap her spine. Her flesh and bone must possess a strength-to-weight ratio and toughness that dwarfs any conventional material, including steel or titanium.
If it was just an "exponential scaling on durability directly related to the scaling of energy generated by normal human movements", giantesses wouldn't be able to quickly turn their necks or swing their arms as it would tear them off.

>>11338113
What you are suggesting is that it is impossible for a giantess to kill another giantess.

A woman landing from a short jump height of 2 feet to land her own feet on the ground does no harm to the woman but you extrapolate that to say that a full bodyweight landing from 2 feet onto another woman's head on the ground would also not harm the other woman. That's absurd. Jumping the 2 feet +6-to-8 inches required for a 2 foot landing onto another woman's head is called a "curb stomp" and is a killing blow.

You also underestimate the relative agility and speed common to mecha. They aren't lumbering robots, they're more frequently depicted as supersonic ninjas, especially in cases such as later Macross entries where the villain mechas require their pilots to have cybernetically enhanced perception and reflexes because human kinesthenics cannot keep up with the robot's extreme relative agility compared with a mere projection of their own human bodies.

>>11338105
Friren, if you put me in your boot against your nylon sole then I'm going to cum, so why sigh?

>>11338117
>What you are suggesting is that it is impossible for a giantess to kill another giantess.
Exactly, it would be close to impossible. Even with the bigger sizes where giantess would be able to deliver blows that are faster than light, at this point their durability would be already high enough to resist FTL movements and it's effects. And the reason is that the durability grows much faster than the energy output to accommodate for the natural movements that become more and more physically impossible with the increase of the size.
>A woman landing from a short jump height of 2 feet to land her own feet on the ground does no harm to the woman but you extrapolate that to say that a full bodyweight landing from 2 feet onto another woman's head on the ground would also not harm the other woman. That's absurd. Jumping the 2 feet +6-to-8 inches required for a 2 foot landing onto another woman's head is called a "curb stomp" and is a killing blow.
That was the different argument from the one in my previous post. You probably misunderstood it, but it explained how scaled force would be basically nullified, that is failing to do any damage even to her skin. But you, for some reason kept drawing parallels with normal sized women.
>You also underestimate the relative agility and speed common to mecha. They aren't lumbering robots, they're more frequently depicted as supersonic ninjas
I don't modern technology already has examples of hypersonic maneuverable weapon systems. However that is completely different from the human agility.
And if we get into the territory of the more sci-fi'ish mechas like mentioned Macross, Gurren Lagann, etc., I can bring up giantess with the additional supernatural/omnipotent powers. Remember, we were discussing normal giantesses before, without extra powers except the one that makes them giantess.

>>11338078
My theory is that the West sought to separate cute and sexy - you either have Minnie Mouse or Jessica Rabbit, while Japan tried to combine them, thus creating 'moe'.

>>11338100
>>11338105
>>11338132
I see. But that doesn't explain why when 99% of western artists try emulating Japanese art style, they turn out to be deviantart tier with this noticeable western art smell. Is that simply a skill issue?

>>11338138
They're trying to copy, rather than making their own style.

Look at modern French animation and comic art. Clearly influenced by Japanese art but its still its own thing and it looks great.

>>11338138
Maybe i've just lost my taste with age but I feel like the average western artist is way better at making appealing size shit now than they were 10-15 years ago, the DA how-to-draw-manga type is much more rare to see.
Even furries have stepped up their game massively and you can feel it, "yiff in hell" stocks are in the gutter and "she looks like she fucks human men" stocks are on the way to the moon.

>>11338139
>Look at modern French animation and comic art
Any good works/artists you can recommend?

>>11338129
>Exactly, it would be close to impossible.
Can you provide some function or equation that suggests how durability would need to scale in that case? because what you have stated beforehand just regards joints and bones that avoid being pulverized by common movements, not joints and bones that avoid common wear and tear from any possible movement that they are capable of entirely. People blow out their own knees running, break their own arms and hands punching with blows that are far below the physics limits of their agility and bodyweight. I tore by own epicondyles recently just by exercising regularly with slow motions involving weights I was easily able to damn near juggle, so I admit I might be too prejudiced in favor of physical vulnerability.
>Remember, we were discussing normal giantesses before, without extra powers except the one that makes them giantess.
I will in turn remind you that we were discussing normal giantesses fighting normal mecha. The type model of a normal mecha is the Gundam series with all of its psychic magic powers, cybernetic transhumans, and other scifi weirdness intact, it would not be anything like itself with that stuff removed since the telepathic mecha are where the narrative themes meet the toyline. I freely admit I do not know where the line between Super Robot and Real Robot genres are drawn, but I do not think it is drawn at a point where robot agility is inferior to giantess agility.

>>11338144
>Can you provide some function or equation that suggests how durability would need to scale in that case?
You are asking me for the function that shows the property which eventually breaks the laws of physics. From the very first post, it was implied that this force is outside of laws of physics, as giantesses wouldn't exist within real world's physics model.
>because what you have stated beforehand just regards joints and bones that avoid being pulverized by common movements, not joints and bones that avoid common wear and tear from any possible movement that they are capable of entirely.
Yes, at bigger sizes (30+ ft), those forces would destroy bones and joints, even if they had the durability of the strongest materials known to man.
>People blow out their own knees running, break their own arms and hands punching with blows that are far below the physics limits of their agility and bodyweight.
You are once again bringing back attention to the normal sized humans that do not have any additional defensive force that outpaces bodies energy output when performing actions (see more in the previous post).
>I will in turn remind you that we were discussing normal giantesses fighting normal mecha.
According to wikipedia, there are 2 mecha sub-genres - Super robot and Real robot. Real robot subgenre is described with mechas that are closer to reality. And it seems like they are definitely inferior to giantess agility.

>>11338143
Only really follow the animation side most of what I'd say for comics is already popular. In terms of recent animation, Le College Noir looks good and wears its influences on its sleeve

Mu yi and the handsome general comes out next year and looks absolutely beautiful

>>11338144
>Gundam
>I do not think it is drawn at a point where robot agility is inferior to giantess agility
Bruh. The fuck you are talking about? Gundam mechas are clumsy as fuck. Tesla's Optimus bot absolutely moggs them in movement and degrees of freedom.

>>11338151
>Yes, at bigger sizes (30+ ft), those forces would destroy bones and joints, even if they had the durability of the strongest materials known to man.
If those energies are what need to be kept up with then durability would only need to scale cubically, regardless of whether or not materials with that durability profile exist. So the forces required to damage or kill would also only need to scale cubically, since the material with that cubically scaled profile is equally fictitious either way.
>You are once again bringing back attention to the normal sized humans that do not have any additional defensive force that outpaces bodies energy output when performing actions (see more in the previous post).
It is very important to the genre that a giantess be able to squish her own breasts a bit in her own hands by applying her cubically scaled casual hand pressure. I cannot imagine any purpose to a giantess who cannot fondle her own chest.

I do not understand the assumption that anti mecha giantesses exist in a growth scenario in which they begin as humans and an infinite outside energy puts them into a process in which every 30 foot giantess is also a 30 kilometer giantess. The only anti mecha 30'-class giantesses known to me are Meltrandi, born to grow to a particular height, which happens to require fictitious and unearthly materials which must have their own particular material limits to explain their humanlike movements and interactions with themselves and their environment.

>Real robot subgenre is described with mechas that are closer to reality. And it seems like they are definitely inferior to giantess agility.
Examples of Real Robot shows that the most zealous Real Robot fans accept as Real Robots are very rare hard SF shows like Patlabor. The rarity of extremely definitive Real Robots would mean that a normal mecha is inside the Super Robot genre, and generally demonstrates giantess or supergiantess level agility.

piyo drew GC. Very sad. I'll be adding him to blacklist. That Anon that said heterosexual enjoyment of this fetish is over gets more right everyday.

>>11338165
>guys, is it gay to like heterosexual couples?

Remember to ignore any and all bait

>>11338163
>If those energies are what need to be kept up with then durability would only need to scale cubically, regardless of whether or not materials with that durability profile exist...
You keep making the same mistake over and over and over again. If you do this one more time, I'll stop responding as it will be clear that you are just a troll with no intention for the civilized discussion. Once again, and for the last time, scaling durability cubically will only cover the survivability of being this big and not moving at all. It only accounts for the weight, not the scaled speed and agility.
>It is very important to the genre that a giantess be able to squish her own breasts a bit in her own hands by applying her cubically scaled casual hand pressure.
And yet it is how it is. Being able to squish her own breasts goes into the category of the additional powers, hence only Super robot mechas will be able to experience being destroyed by a giantess with squishable boobs (if we only pair them with the giantesses with additional powers).
>I do not understand the assumption that anti mecha giantesses exist... every 30 foot giantess is also a 30 kilometer giantess
There is no such assumption. 30 ft giantess is a very rough approximation where they would be durable enough to tank any conventional weapons to any part of their bodies, but can be defeated with nukes (point blank) or equivalent weapons. So yeah, if mecha can self-destruct in a nuclear blast or have similarly powerful weapons, it might be enough to kill a 30ft giantess. 30 kilometer giantess are the ones who are able to do movements at large fractions of the speed of light and tank such blasts (remember that durability scales faster), thus being completely nuke-proof.
>...normal mecha is inside the Super Robot genre...
Well, I guess means that we can compare them against omnipotent giantesses

>>11338174
Let's not pretend coupleshit doesn't always focus on the guy and cvckholding, making it very gay.

>>11338193
>Liking giant men
Obvious gay shit. You want a big man. No explanation needed.
>Liking giant couples
Less gay. You're projecting onto the giant dude and enjoying his GF with him. It's a cuck/voyeur fantasy, but at least you're acknowledging a heterosexual dynamic. A man is still in the picture being a man.
>Liking solo giantess
The absolute gayest tier.
Your brain is so gay it has to gender-swap the dynamic to make wanting to be dominated palatable. You're not into femdom, you're a closeted power bottom who's scared of real men.

>>11338200
Go post your mental illness in the appropriate thread fag.

>>11338183
>Once again, and for the last time, scaling durability cubically will only cover the survivability of being this big and not moving at all.
No, cubic scaling in this discussion was always about movement in human-relative ways. There is no demonstration that the brachiosaur's defensive technique of rearing its 50 ton weight onto its hindlegs to kick with its forelegs required heartmuscles dense enough to deflect an antimaterial round or that their bones were tougher than Chobham, that was a requirement of giantesses specifically because of giantesses' rapid movement focusing unnatural force on human joints and human bone cross sections.
>And yet it is how it is. Being able to squish her own breasts goes into the category of the additional powers,
This places normal giantesses without such powers into a nightmare scenario in which they are unable to perform the deep tissue massaging necessary to stimulate the majority of the clitoral nerve, thereby dooming humanity to endless horny rampage.

>>11338035
>>11338113
>And this "normal human agility" factor is really the main driving force here
>giantesses wouldn't be able to quickly turn their necks or swing their arms as it would tear them off.
Can't they just be a little slower then? I thought the goal of this thought experiment was directly scaling the giantess up with the square cubed law, including their body's strength. If the result of that is they're physically required to be slower to stop from breaking physics, I think that's probably as 'accurate' a giantess model as you're going to get.

I might be completely misunderstanding though. I'm only barely skimming these conversations because blocks of text make head hurty. If you mean that a giantess would be completely unable to move *at all* even if you scaled up her body's strength, then I understand more why giantess would need to be essentially indestructible to work at all, even if that's a little less cool.
Fuck I hate how hard it is to make a 'realistic enough' giantess. Why does fantasy have to be impossible, bros

>>11338211
>Ignores what I said, makes the same mistakes (AGAIN), brings back absolutely unrelated chunky and slow brachiosaur that overcomes the square-cube law because of it's form, not the external powers, etc.
As I expected. You are here either not for the constructive discussion or you lack critical thinking abilities to continue the discussion at this point.
Hereby, as promised, I conclude this pointless attempt of talking to the wall. You completely failed to prove that any standard mecha could defeat a giant girl of at least 30ft in height, and the fact still stands that 30ft giantess beats those mechas no diff.

>>11338219
>Can't they just be a little slower then?
No, slow giantesses is a niche thing done in some movies. In the size fetish community though, they mostly act with the normal human agility.
But if we use this type of slow giantess without additional durability for the speed, then yes, they would be vulnerable to a lot of conventional weapons and will lose to any sci-fi mechas/robots

>>11338239
>No, slow giantesses is a niche thing done in some movies. In the size fetish community though, they mostly act with the normal human agility.
I mean *to be fair*, in almost all (good) giantess animation they slow down the giantess a fair amount to make them feel more grounded, although that's more of a stylization choice than anything else since fast moving big things feel uncanny and weightless as a rule of thumb. That's why all those old MMD size animations with Miku dancing on top of a city at full speed feel so weird.

>posting the shadman of size unironically

>>11338234
And you have yet to supply an argument in support of your apparently sincere belief that the energy absorbing capacity of a material would need to exponentially dwarf the cubic scaling of energy required to move that material in order to survive said merely cubically scaled energy involved with said motion, or why a body being capable of some motion in one manner means that entire body must be capable of surviving that same energy applied at every single point in the body.

>>11338243
I'd say that animations that do that, do it mainly with a goal to stretch frames.
And if consider the animation by scrag that you added, to me it seems only barely slowed down at the very beginning. Laying down looks a bit slower, because earth gravity is constant. The other moments look like normal human-like speed/agility - just look at how her arm/hand/fingers move at the end, normal speed that a human-sized girl would move.

>>11338248
>You still haven't read any arguments
>Still making the same mistakes
>Still the same cope

>>11337887
Animal/insect stomping is not giantess at all. That's basically a completely different fetish. You're a retard, don't talk to us.

>>11338260
nta, but isn't it called a crush fetish? As far as I know, there is no specialized fetish about crushing animals/insects. And crush is also a sub-fetish for the giantess fetish.

>>11338260
You obviously don't know the history of this fetish so please sit down.

>>11338250
I think they do it to preserve the scale. Most size animation does this with big things because it's just how you make things feel big. If you want things to feel big and weighty, you slow them down, makes them feel dramatic and heaving.
Only size animations that don't do this are usually ones that involve shrink rather than growth, and even then if you look close you can see the speed of things change a lot depending on if the perspective is from the giantess or the tiny.

I mean it's probably not to the degree it would make them 'realistically slow' but it is something that does add to the sexiness, even if the basis for that is just an animators tool.

>>11338269
>>11338271
I'm sorry, do you guys get off to videos of women stepping on rats?

>>11338269
>>11338271
I'm sorry, do you guys get off to videos of women stepping on rats? Because I sure as fuck don't, and in fact I'm willing to bet if you polled most of the anons here they don't either. So this is the wrong place for that shit.

>>11338269
Insect stamping is often grouped with bugfights and reptilian-vore and other forms of borderline zoosadism. The focus is typically on the animal and maybe as a secondary feature on a woman's feet. There's some crossover, especially among furries and other types prone to zoosadism, but very typically, a giantess fetishist who is not also a zoosadist will either not find that material satisfying even if presented in a giantess context or will move out to more "pure" representations of giantess stuff that doesn't involve getting SPECIES KEKED by LITERAL BUGS because god damn how KEKED do you have to be for your PRIMARY SEXUAL INTERACTION to be KEKED AWAY FROM YOU and experienced only by a LITERAL COCKROACH. If the sexual interest is in the giantess stamping, then it's KEKERY to want to watch some ANIMAL get to experience that sexual moment.
I do not feel good about saying PsychoJosh is correct especially when there is a sliver of an argument against him. But, the thing that I want even less than to agree with PsychoJosh, is to agree to get KEKED by FUCKING BUGS.

>>11338246
shadman's art is atrocious

scrag's animation skills are amazing, he just has absolutely horrible taste

>>11338277
>Only size animations that don't do this are usually ones that involve shrink rather than growth
Literally your previous vidrelated animation didn't have a slow down effect except the gravitational pull during while laying down. And I don't know about you, but to me that animation was hella sexy, much more than the one you added in this post. That is probably also related to the skill of the animator.
Also, I noticed that most of the slowed down are made with the mmd (and VRoid?). Most likely because there is no way to show the weight of the giantess except for deliberately slowed down movement.
All in all, this slow-down effect looks more like either to stretch frames or as a crutch for the skill/technical limitations of the software. Definitely not the stylistic option.

>>11337607
>roll through stomp
>get hit by shocikwave and die anyway

>>11338286
The one explanation that I can think of is that it is as close as it gets to the giantess/shrink in real life, even though it is portrayed through the different species. Only other real life alternatives don't come close in realism - roleplay, games, animations, videos where girl steps on tiny toy figurines, videos with shitty cgi, etc.
I guess we have to wait for the matrix-style fdvr technology to enjoy the giantess experience fully.

>>11338293
??? Are we watching the same video? Everything was slowed down. Her hefting the rifle, her crouching down, even her hand was slowed down quite a bit at the end. Look at how slow her fingers are, and the overall motion of her hand. How the inertia of it builds up to it's peak. Do that motion with your hand and see how fast and twitchy it looks. The motions are 100% 'slowed' down. The inertia of everything has to be built up before reaching it's peak speed. There's no limiting factor of the software here
I'm trying to show you a variety of animators showing that all of them have stuff slowed down quite a bit to get the sense of scale right.
If you've ever seen a 3dpd "giantess" video, you'll know that even those they often have to slow down to stop the girl from looking weird and 'normal sized', even though 3dpd is objectively gross and I'm just using it as an example here.

>>11338304
>Her hefting the rifle
Looked just barely slower than it would be
>her crouching down
She didn't crouch down, she dropped on her knees (Did you watch the animation yourself?) - already explained that gravity is constant and she will fall "slowly"
>even her hand was slowed down quite a bit at the end
Completely disagree, the movement is as natural as it gets for normal-sized human and would look weird if it was faster than that
>How the inertia of it builds up to it's peak. Do that motion with your hand and see how fast and twitchy it looks.
Are you sure you watched the video? There are 3 distinct, short and separate hand movement in the end. There is no place for inertial to build up
>The inertia of everything has to be built up before reaching it's peak speed.
She moves her hand behind then moves it it forward with full speed. First, it lost all "inertia" when it reversed direction and second, it went in full speed in the completely different direction, without any "inertia". Did you watch the video, again?
>If you've ever seen a 3dpd "giantess" video, you'll know that even those they often have to slow down to stop the girl from looking weird and 'normal sized'
Watched only a handful, but never seen any where they deliberately slow down, probably quite rare

>>11338304
Another thing that I noticed about scrags giantess animations is that the ones which are actually slowed down are the ones with the hyper giantess while the ones where giantess has normal proportions have normal speed.

>>11338315
I'm not entirely sure if you're trolling or you just don't know what you're looking at tbdesu, so I'm just gonna say agree to disagree.
Get stepped on, nerd. A thousand plush feet uponst you

>>11338323
Looks like you are the same coping retard who can't read and comprehend information. So, did you enjoy samefagging?

>>11338078
You became a weeb

>>11338219
>Can't they just be a little slower then?
That's really not enough for reasons that should have been addressed at first blush.
>>11336720
>The additional buff for the human-like agility exponentially increases both strength (to outpace the cubically increasing weight), but also speed (to match relative human agility/speed, increasing with the volume of the body). The later means that power and projected force are growing at astronomical rates.
This seems to be where this gentleman's fundamental misunderstanding of energy demand growth comes from.

Matching mass is a cubic factor, as we are assuming a magic body composition with a density equivalent to the human body despite all other material properties. So as the height factor (h) increases, the mass increases as a factor of m(h^3).
Match human agility and speed at scale is a linear factor of v*h, and the energy required for that component squares. KE=1/2mvv, means you get 3 powers of h from the volumetric increase in m, and only 2 from v^2. v is only more important than m when v is increased, or is sufficiently greater than m and/or h. But to size Ronda Rousey up from 5'7" to 30', h factor is 5.37 whereas her perceived punch velocity is 5m/s, and m is 61.2kg. The mass associated component of energy requirements under square-cube law grow faster as mass grows than as velocity grows, because the mass component grows cubically with linear scale whereas the velocity component only squares with linear scale. It is easier for a giantess to make up for the velocity deficit as a linear-square than to adjust to the sheer mass energy requirements as a cubic, not the other way around. This could be described as a quintic power of h-factor but every useful or interesting application of this will separate it into its m and v components where m as the cubic will do more to define the shape of results than will (hv)^2. Necessarily.

>>11338323
>>11338315
>>11338304
Regarding the whole speed debate vs size, you can't slow them down to the "physically accurate" speed according to gravity, at least not at larger scales.
If we assume gravity acts the same then the time the gts puts her foot down when taking a step is proportional to the square root of scale.
(Constant acceleration due to gravity and ignoring air resistance.)
This leads to excessive duration a meager 100x scale would mean a 10x relative slow down for any animation.
So it comes down to either also speeding up tinys to keep relative speed consistent or completely throwing realism out.
>>11338277
That's the upper end of giga scale if that's a scale factor of 100,000 you'd have to slow down the animation by a factor of 316. So from a tiny's perspective it would take about 5 minutes for her to take a single step.

>>11338349
You don't have to deal with volumes, square cube laws and such since the limiting factor will always be gravity for practical animation that should look physically plausible.
The giantess is always as strong / as robust as the narrative needs her to be.

>>11338349
You don't have to deal with volumes, square cube laws and such since the limiting factor will always be gravity for practical animation that should look physically plausible.
The giantess is always as strong / as robust as the narrative needs her to be.
What remains is the relative speed she can walk at due to walking requiring the feet to fall back to the ground. So unless there's some other magic involved that also "changes the gravitational constant" a giantess walking would be like a real woman walking on the moon, or mostly an asteroid.
You can compensate for that by speeding up time for the camera which would have the result of having tinys zip around like ants. That can be appealing but is difficult to do some most animations just wing it and have the giantess not only be made of magical materials but also change how gravity works as to be able to walk normally.

>noooo you can't make me live on your butt the science doesn't make sense
Get shrunk fucking nerd

>>11338356
>So from a tiny's perspective it would take about 5 minutes for her to take a single step.
Time dilation is kinda hot, but it works better with shrinking than giantess stuff, imo. Being trapped between cheeks for what feels like weeks, but is in fact, a few minutes, has some weird appeal to it.

>>11338375
Shrinking is easier to do from a suspension of disbelief perspective but it's a different sub-fetish to mega / giga scale where large scale destruction is the appeal vs being individually overwhelmed by her.

>>11338286
Correction: only shrinkfags get keked by bugs.
Growthbros win again and stay winning.

>>11338381
To be completely fair, five minutes is still basically no time at all for something of that scale. You'd still be crushed beneath her without a single chance to get out from under her foot in time. And gives you enough time to fap before you get crushed as a bonus

>>11338349
Alright you guys are just pasting responses from ChatGPT at this point.

>>11338078
There are a lot of reasons but the main root cause is pedo hysteria in the West. First, this causes artists to shy away from neoteny, which is needed to make women attractive. But this also causes a bigger problem. Learning to draw well takes a fuckton of effort, and the main reason to do that is if you have a kink that you can't achieve in reality. Japan has a bunch of unironic pedos drawing, probably the most common case especially if you count the hebephiles etc. In the west we are stuck relying on furries and weirdos with niche fetishes like us, so the talent pool is smaller.

>>11338123
will never be Frieren and Ferns tiny pet
>>11338243
love this clip so much the slow motion, her size and thiccness
need full on anime with giant girls SOL some in army, some as public workers, OLs ect...

>>11338078
The fact is that most western artists are insufferable leftists who want art to be ugly and demoralizing. It's why they absolutely seethe at the sight of beautiful women, beautiful scenery, beautiful. Audiences are attracted to attractive art, and Japanese manga offers beautiful art, beautiful characters, and overall uplifting messages. They're culturally opposites at this point, generally speaking. You have a number of examples counter to this, but by and large Western art is nothing but a trojan horse for trashy lefty psyops while manga offers the people what they want.

>>11338142
>Even furries have stepped up their game massively
That doesn't surprise me. They've always been unusually good with tech. I find it kind of funny that while the best 2D artists tend to be Eastern, the best 3D animators are almost always Western. I dunno, maybe people in Japan just have shitty computers that are only good for drawing.

>>11338250
>I'd say that animations that do that, do it mainly with a goal to stretch frames.
Incorrect, kind of. Some absolutely do that. Like when a giant anime girl kind of roboticly raises her foot to stomp something. But the good animations need extra frames to show everything moving. For example, if something big wants to grab something, it'll rotate its chest (because that's the root of the shoulder), then it'll rotate its shoulder (because that's the root of the arm), then it'll move its arm (because that's the base of the forearm), then its forearm (etc), and then finally its hand. In order to convey scale, you have to convey just how heavy something is, and how thus much energy is required to move it. In a normal-scale animation, all this stuff happens but in very few frames. You don't need that much energy to move your arm. A proper size animation will emphasize this movement chain, and will carry momentum. Something that big and heavy won't stop on a dime, it'll keep moving for a bit.

Pacific Rim already effectively perfected all this. Size animators ought to watch it and pay attention to how the robots and kaiju move.

Fuck this gay shit

>>11338461
>ReSpEcT tHe DiGnItY oF FiCtIoNaL cHaRaCtErS
lmao
just use deepseek bro

>>11338480
The fact that I can ask for the most deranged and depraved shit, that Deepseek will give me the answer, a bit of time so I can copy it and then delete it for "guideline reasons", makes me super happy. ChatGPT can eat shit.

>>11338481
>Deepseek will give me the answer, a bit of time so I can copy it and then delete it for "guideline reasons"
if you use it through sillytavern you don't even have to worry about that
it will hesitate a bit to actually kill off the user's character but it will be cruel and dominant as hell and can do fatal stuff with a tiny bit of handholding

>>11338461
Good thing mastercard-oniichan was here to protect the innocent character from your evil prompt!

>>11338461
Skill issue.
Give me a prompt and I'll make it happen.

The quality of these threads is miserable. I wish death and misery on every single one of you faggots. Fuck you all, and I'll see you tomorrow.

>starlight mini is god tier at upscaling 480i clips
>... but only at 0.1fps
>can't even pause and resume it

Would be nice to queue up a dozen or so terrible quality videos that will probably see a better quality release

Could Saeko beat a mech?

>>11338680
That would be the battle of the century:
>Saeko (the weakest giantess)
vs
>Mechs (the weakest entity in the fiction)
To be honest, I don't even know what the outcome would be

>>11338680
>Saeko
Which one?

>>11338680
She can just shrink one, can't she?

Billions dead

>>11338806
What's even the context with that earth ball?

>>11338809
I have only played global, so not sure. I do however know I want Gentildonna to step on me

>>11338526
these two just make me want content with Twins from Persona 5
>>11338806
something something Uma magic/science so humans are fine

>>11338836
I'm surprised there's basically nothing with the Jailers, they're basically tailored for sizeshit at huge or minigts scales.

Does anyone have the name of that animator who made an animated giga giantess video (in anime style- maybe MMD) of a GTS crushing a city underfoot and each time there is a fatality rate with each step?

>>11338841
it really is a crime
them slowly shrinking MC to tease or shrinking really tiny and put him in a keychain ect..

>>11338842
First thing that comes to mind is this Scragboy video
https://mega.nz/file/FjpTEBDI#b7Gw1Y0uUu2NKEu81FYjN23GTOfzsZAU9icyiPh-VWg

>>11338842
sounds like gonzres
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DSfHyN08b4&ab_channel=Frostie

>>11338842
Yeah, that screams Gonzres https://x.com/gonzres1

>>11336043
don't think crankowanko has been mentioned yet

>>11338425

>>11338860
>MMD floaty step animations
this is why the east is still losing at 3D animation

>>11338891
>still
That's quite bold of you to assume that they will ever overcome western ones. To me it looks like they are at least 2 decades behind. And with emerging AI, they will never have a chance to catch up.

>>11338891
>>11338894

This is funny, considering there is a shitload of talented non-size animators in the east, who do insane solo works.

Why do they suck at size so much? Japan is one of the kinkiest countries, China is pretty horny as well, surely there should be a really good animator who is into size?

Does anybody know why Scrag stopped going by the name Maarthul and stopped making 2D art?

>>11338461
kekaroo just use literally any other model
closedai models are slop

>>11338877

>>11338990

>>11338993

>>11338526
wish there was some story or comic about these two playing with model trains and tiny passengers

>>11338854
Bingo anon
Thanks lads

>>11338930
Is it actually the same dude? I never realized how similar the content was just in 3d.

>>11339106
It's them. You can tell with the way the faces are drawn and how thick they draw various characters. I just want to know what made them stop since a lot of their 2D art is pretty good too.

>>11338375
ReSizeMe had an ending with extreme time dilation that was more horror than fetish by that point

>>11338690
The weakest enemy in fiction is the regular military that jobs to everything

>>11339176
When time dilation goes beyond like 10 years, it's definitely more horror than sexy at that point. Especially when it's timescales the brain can't even fathom, like thousands or millions of years felt per real world second.
Hell, even a year is kinda pushing it from a realistic standpoint

>>11339144
money, probably
or an interest in animation which is way easier in 3d than 2d

>>11339189
Money might explain why they no longer make 2D art but then why would they delete their account and try to scrub their art?

rape them all till they are gentle

>>11339187
Obviously it would get boring in reality but I think the concept of someone being stuck under a giant girl for an unfathomably long time is super hot…like imagine being stuck to a girl’s nipple, and no matter how hard you press your palms against it your body just sinks back in, and this continues quite literally forever with the only variance being the intermittent periods of desperate struggle…

>>11339200
>waits for page 9 to post trying to get the last word in
Coward

Have people ever found your porn folder / found out you have this fetish?
One person a decade ago found my porn and I still cringe about it to this day

>>11339211
Niggers don't know how to scroll past things they don't like. We don't need a dozen threads

>>11339189
Being good at animation is a very different set of skills compared to being a good 2D artist. That's apples to oranges. 3D Sculpting, however, is much easier if you know how to draw. Those two skills do have a lot of overlap.
>>11339195
I have no idea why he deleted that account. Iirc, he actually went by another name after he deleted Maarthul and made a handful more 2D images. But I think the aggregate sites like e621 just kept referring to his artist tag as Maarthul, and maybe added an alias for whatever name he was posting under then. This is where my memory gets super fuzzy, but he might have been worried about someone IRL finding out about his Internet art. I also vaguely recall him making a potentially controversial Twitter post/reply about the ages of drawn characters. I think essentially he was saying he didn't care about the ages of characters in drawings because they were drawings. But it's been so long and I didn't screencap it that I forget exactly what it said. I only remember the vibe. This is why he has OCs that are totally not Gwen and totally not Pacifica. I guess the huge tits and ass weren't enough for some people, they read a wiki somewhere so that art is totally unacceptable.

I knew he was Maarthul when he popped off in early 2023. There's a render he did with a character on a beach, and that render has the exact same composition of an anthro Twilight Sparkle picture he did years earlier. Focal characters even have the exact same proportions too. I didn't want to bring it up because I was afraid he'd go into hiding again. He was into red dots back in the day, and it's a pity his animations don't have any. Also the thread is saging so I can say I wish he did a bit more pony stuff.

>>11339316
Its definitely really obvious now that you bring it up, the faces in their 2d stuff look exactly the same as their sculpts, and you made me think of scrag's animation where a dude is getting butt slammed into a locker which is almost 1:1 with a pony pic from Maar

>>11339176
>his fetish isn't horror

>>11338911
My guess is it's simply the software they use. MMD runs on a potato, and there's a ton of free models for it (as well as customizing the models is very easy). Problem is it's incredibly limited as an animation software. All the good 3D animations have some post processing done to them after they're rendered from Blender or Maya or whatever. While you can get anime models into Blender, it's kind of a pain in the ass, and not as simple as the MMD workflow.

>>11339316
It sounds like they stopped doing 2D art to avoid getting found out by people that know them irl. That's a shame but understandable.

>>11339316
This is why you should never listen to character agefags

Word on the street is Margot Robbie will be the lead in Tim Burton's attack of the 50ft woman remake. this is anime

>>11339472
People didn't use to. It used to be if a character depicted in a piece of art had adult (or greater) proportions, they were treated as an adult. There's god knows how many pictures of Pokegirls with extremely large breasts and butts and no one cared until about 5 years ago. Frankly I think it's just from people with skeletons in their closets trying to throw people off their scent. I don't think normal "Thads" care.

>>11339200
I miss Imoko

>>11339482
Aging them up in the first place means you've already lost that battle. I'd rather see proper loli Gwen or Pacifica instead of balloon animals meant to appease normies. Artists would put a lot more passion into it if they didn't have to fear that their own work might endanger their own well being. That's before you even get to the whole payment processor aspect.

Latest event chapter in FGO

>>11339482
>There's god knows how many pictures of Pokegirls with extremely large breasts and butts and no one cared until about 5 years ago.
Lol no, people did care, even 15 years ago, Giantess City practically banned any anime posting over "characters ages"
The reason Pokegirls were allowed (and not even with large breasts or butts) is because the admins and mods grew up with the pokemon anime and fapped to them, the same way they grew up with Teen Titans, so it was ok to sexualize them on GC.
Outside of GC you had Sizebox, where the moment furries and redditors got their hands on its development instantly put rules about characters age. Oh, but if it is cub shit then is allowed because, of course furries will masturbate to furry children.
And even outside the size-fetish spheres, a lot of people vocal about porn or hentai end up in the news for actual CP shit

I swear, every time somebody brings up fictional characters age as a "no-no", they 100% have skeletons in the closet themselves

>>11339503
>Outside of GC you had Sizebox, where the moment furries and redditors got their hands on its development instantly put rules about characters age. Oh, but if it is cub shit then is allowed because, of course furries will masturbate to furry children.
This is what pisses me off the most about Sizebox. The mods will bend over backwards trying to defend Sonic characters then turn around and not let you upload a Highschool DXD model. Which is ironic because doesn't the creator get off to the Madoka girls? Is there any place to get models that isn't their god awful Discord.

>>11339482
>>11339503
I wonder if these sorts of comments are why Pogojo vanished

>>11339507
>Go to the Sizebox discord
>Model request
>Somebody requested ports of some MHA characters
>"UUUUH THOSE CHARACTERS ARE UNDERAGE SWEATY"
>Literally under it, some guy keeps spamming the Asriel from Undertale request
> ompletely fine

>>11339507
It's been a very long time since I used sizebox, but last time I did IIRC all you had to do was put a .pmx (MMD's model format) file into unity with a plugin downloaded, press a button, and you got a sizebox-ready model. It was trivial although a bit annoying to download all of unity just for the sake of playing around with this loli foxgirl. But assuming they haven't changed it in like 8 years (big assumption) you just need to find some MMD models you like, download Unity and you're good to go.

>>11339484
top tier scenario but especially the scale

is a non-retard gonna make a new thread

>>11339605
If I was retarded would I know?

>>11339611
If the giant girl who caught you was a retard, would you know?

>>11336617
>>11336592

If you want to be autistic about this, at that size tank rounds are more akin to being shot by a pistol. So, no, very much not nuke proof. You'd need to get quite a bit bigger than that to survive an atom bomb let alone survive it unscathed. Just because they are durable enough to withstand the square cube law would at most mean roughly equivalent to steel in terms of durability, maybe tungsten. However, they aren't going to suddenly gain the same durability as depleted uranium until they are quite a bit bigger. After all, we can still blow up a blue whale quite easily and those are much bigger than merely 30-50 feet. Obviously not a perfect comparison as the water helps with the issues of weight, but the point still stands.

If she was more in the range of 50 meters however, maybe...And 100? Certainly.

if a giant girl falls on a city, but no one survives to tell about it, does it give me an erection?

New thread:
>>11339647
>>11339647

>>11339648
No! (It was your city)

>>11336638
>OC Slop
>Doesn't realize that every character unless an expy is technically an OC, just one owned by massive media corporations
I get that some people are extremely cringy with them but just because it isn't fucking Princess Peach, Mount Lady, or fucking wonder woman, all characters that wouldn't stomp around and smash shit up for sadistic fun, doesn't mean it's slop.

>>11339697
point and laugh at the cringe oc tard

>>11339625
retarded midwit, just like that other anon (but most likely samefag)

>>11339494
I disagree. People like characters for their personality and overall design. Aging them up shouldn't really radically alter their personality in any meaningful way, and they can always just wear larger versions of their old clothes. I assume most people into Pacifica are into her specifically for her valley girl stereotypical personality, not her age. Are some into her specifically for her age? Absolutely, but I don't think most are. Not for that character in particular. Same with Gwen, same with Raven, etc.

If a character looks like an adult, or a bimbo adults, normies don't give a fuck. It's failed normies that care about this sort of thing.
>>11339509
Definitely. Pogojo seemed like he was drifting a tiny bit towards the SJW side of the Internet, which was retarded because they'd crucify him for the shit he used to draw. He even nuked his Deviantart and Pixiv gallery. He has a Twitter it seems, but only certain people are allowed to see his account. I assume he learned to draw as a kid, drew a lot of that stuff as a teen and early 20 something, and then had a moral panic around 30 and nuked it all. The mental health gay is truly a plague all size artists must either overcome or succumb to.

>>11339787
If an artist ages a character up out of his own interest or to explore something new, that's fine, but I meant they shouldn't do it out of fear of judgment from their peers. If they cede that one inch, they've already lost the mile, they just don't know it yet.

>>11338200
If I am a woman how do the dynamics between liking solo giant men, couples and solo giant women change?

>>11339856
you have not provided boobs with timestamp, therefore you're not a woman.